Spatial domain reconstruction for imaging speed-of-sound with pulse-echo ultrasound: simulation and in vivo study

Despite many uses of ultrasound, some pathologies such as breast cancer still cannot reliably be diagnosed in either conventional B-mode ultrasound imaging nor with more recent ultrasound elastography methods. Speed-of-sound (SoS) is a quantitative imaging biomarker, which is sensitive to structural changes due to pathology, and hence could facilitate diagnosis. Full-angle ultrasound computed tomography (USCT) was proposed to obtain spatially-resolved SoS images, however, its water-bath setup involves practical limitations. To increase clinical utility and for widespread use, recently, a limited-angle Fourier-domain SoS reconstruction was proposed, however, it suffers from significant image reconstruction artifacts. In this work, we present a SoS reconstruction strategy, where the forward problem is formulated using differential time-of-flight measurements based on apparent displacements along different ultrasound wave propagation paths, and the inverse problem is solved in spatial-domain using a proposed total-variation scheme with spatially-varying anisotropic weighting to compensate for geometric bias from limited angle imaging setup. This is shown to be robust to missing displacement data and easily allow for incorporating any prior geometric information. In numerical simulations, SoS values in inclusions are accurately reconstructed with 90% accuracy up to a noise level of 50%. With respect to Fourier-domain reconstruction, our proposed method improved contrast ratio from 0.37 to 0.67 for even high noise levels such as 50%. Numerical full-wave simulation and our preliminary in vivo results illustrate the clinical applicability of our method in a breast cancer imaging setting. Our proposed method requires single-sided access to the tissue and can be implemented as an add-on to conventional ultrasound equipment, applicable to a range of transducers and applications.

[1]  C. R. Hill,et al.  Acoustic properties of normal and cancerous human liver-II. Dependence of tissue structure. , 1981, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  Cuiping Li,et al.  In-vivo imaging results with ultrasound tomography: report on an ongoing study at the Karmanos Cancer Institute , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Andreas Koch,et al.  An ultrasound tomography system with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) moldings for coupling: in vivo results for 3-D pulse-echo imaging of the female breast , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[4]  R Janka,et al.  Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study. , 2008, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[5]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Mesh Adaptation for Improving Elasticity Reconstruction Using the FEM Inverse Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Jakob Nebeker,et al.  Imaging of Sound Speed Using Reflection Ultrasound Tomography , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  Haim Azhari,et al.  Ultrasonic speed of sound dispersion imaging. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  P. Wilcox,et al.  Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit-receive array data for non-destructive evaluation , 2005 .

[9]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Image-Based Reconstruction of Tissue Scatterers Using Beam Steering for Ultrasound Simulation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  M Hirama,et al.  An evaluation of an in vivo local sound speed estimation technique by the crossed beam method. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Breast-density assessment with hand-held ultrasound: A novel biomarker to assess breast cancer risk and to tailor screening? , 2018, European Radiology.

[12]  Neb Duric,et al.  Comparison of breast density measurements made using ultrasound tomography and mammography , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Martin Frenz,et al.  Computed ultrasound tomography in echo mode for imaging speed of sound using pulse-echo sonography: proof of principle. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Pai-Chi Li,et al.  Ultrasonic computed tomography reconstruction of the attenuation coefficient using a linear array , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  Haim Azhari,et al.  A Method for Characterization of Tissue Elastic Properties Combining Ultrasonic Computed Tomography With Elastography , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[16]  Jinbum Kang,et al.  Phantom and in vivo evaluation of sound speed estimation methods: Preliminary results , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[17]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Hand-Held Sound-Speed Imaging Based on Ultrasound Reflector Delineation , 2016, MICCAI.

[18]  M.A. Lubinski,et al.  Speckle tracking methods for ultrasonic elasticity imaging using short-time correlation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  Helmut Ermert,et al.  Limited angle ultrasonic transmission tomography of the compressed female breast , 1998, 1998 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No. 98CH36102).

[20]  J.F. Krucker,et al.  Sound speed estimation using automatic ultrasound image registration , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  I Céspedes,et al.  On the feasibility of pulse-echo speed of sound estimation in small regions: simulation studies. , 1992, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  J Ophir,et al.  An analysis of elastographic contrast-to-noise ratio. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[24]  N. Duric,et al.  In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  J C Bamber,et al.  Ultrasonic B-scanning: a computer simulation , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Dae C. Shin,et al.  Differentiation of Cancerous Lesions in Excised Human Breast Specimens Using Multiband Attenuation Profiles From Ultrasonic Transmission Tomography , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[27]  Michael P. Andre,et al.  Pre-Clinical Experience with Full-Wave Inverse-Scattering for Breast Imaging , 2008 .

[28]  C. R. Hill,et al.  Acoustic properties of normal and cancerous human liver-I. Dependence on pathological condition. , 1981, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  Gregg E Trahey,et al.  A Method for Direct Localized Sound Speed Estimates Using Registered Virtual Detectors , 2012, Ultrasonic imaging.

[30]  Peter R. Hoskins,et al.  Diagnostic ultrasound: physics and equipment (second edition) , 2010 .

[31]  C F Chen,et al.  Pulse-echo ultrasound speed measurements: progress and prospects. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Principles of computerized tomographic imaging , 2001, Classics in applied mathematics.

[33]  Ichiro Sakuma,et al.  Limb muscle sound speed estimation by ultrasound computed tomography excluding receivers in bone shadow , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[34]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Motion Tracking in 2D Ultrasound Using Vessel Models and Robust Optic-Flow , 2015 .

[35]  Gary J. Whitman,et al.  Screening Breast Ultrasound: Where Are We Today? , 2016, Current Breast Cancer Reports.

[36]  V. Marmarelis,et al.  Differentiation of BIRADS-4 small breast lesions via Multimodal Ultrasound Tomography , 2015, European Radiology.

[37]  E. Sidky,et al.  Accurate image reconstruction from few-views and limited-angle data in divergent-beam CT , 2009, 0904.4495.

[38]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Robust sound speed estimation for ultrasound-based hepatic steatosis assessment , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  Xiaolin Wu An efficient antialiasing technique , 1991, SIGGRAPH.

[40]  Anand Asundi,et al.  Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review , 2009 .

[41]  S. Salcudean,et al.  Sub-sample displacement estimation from digitized ultrasound RF signals using multi-dimensional polynomial fitting of the cross-correlation function , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[42]  B. Garra,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING. , 2011, Current medical imaging reviews.

[43]  Robert Rohling,et al.  Viscoelastic characterization of soft tissue from dynamic finite element models , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  Roman Furrer,et al.  Analytical modeling, finite-difference simulation and experimental validation of air-coupled ultrasound beam refraction and damping through timber laminates, with application to non-destructive testing. , 2015, Ultrasonics.

[45]  O H Gilja,et al.  EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography.Part 2: Clinical Applications , 2013, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[46]  N. Boyd,et al.  Breast density measurements with ultrasound tomography: a comparison with film and digital mammography. , 2013, Medical physics.

[47]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Comparison between 2-D cross correlation with 2-D sub-sampling and 2-D tracking using beam steering , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[48]  Martin Frenz,et al.  Towards clinical computed ultrasound tomography in echo-mode: Dynamic range artefact reduction. , 2015, Ultrasonics.

[49]  Peter R. Hoskins,et al.  Diagnostic ultrasound : physics and equipment , 2010 .

[50]  Graham M. Treece,et al.  Estimation of average speed of sound using deconvolution of medical ultrasound data. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[51]  F. Schaefer,et al.  EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography. Part 1: Basic Principles and Technology , 2013, Ultraschall in der Medizin.