Dental, skeletal asymmetries and functional characteristics in Class II subdivision malocclusions.

Treatment outcomes of Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions may be compromised because of the uncertainty of the aetiology. Previous studies have reported controversial ideas about the origins, but the existence of a primary contributor still remains unknown. Functional factors have been mentioned as a probable cause, but until now, there have been no supporting data. This study was a cross-sectional investigation of the characteristics of Angle Class II subdivision malocclusion, including dental, skeletal and functional factors, by comparison of the subdivision group and the normal occlusion group. The evaluations of dental and skeletal asymmetries of both groups were carried out by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis of dental casts. The functional deviations were evaluated by cast mounting and measuring. In the subdivision group, the asymmetric position of the glenoid fossa was found to be the most significant skeletal asymmetry. No dentoalveolar asymmetry was found in this group. The most important finding was that, in subdivision malocclusions, functional deviation resulting in pseudoasymmetry occurred in 32.86% of the study participants. This deviation is probably related to the disharmonious arch width between maxillary and mandibular dental arches in the premolar section. The origin of Angle Class II subdivision malocclusion is multifactorial, with dental, skeletal and functional factors included. Functional deviation occurs, probably due to dental arch width disharmony. Asymmetric position of the glenoid fossa may account for most of the skeletal asymmetry.

[1]  Hu Long,et al.  Integration accuracy of laser-scanned dental models into maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography images of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings. , 2014, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[2]  Greg J. Huang,et al.  Classification and treatment of Class II subdivision malocclusions. , 2014, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  R. Behrents,et al.  Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  R. Nanda,et al.  Editor's Comment and Q&A , 2010 .

[5]  R. Nanda,et al.  Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  Solange Mongelli de Fantini,et al.  Condylar displacement between centric relation and maximum intercuspation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  G. Shen,et al.  The Association between Lower Incisal Inclination and Morphology of the Supporting Alveolar Bone — A Cone-Beam CT Study , 2009, International Journal of Oral Science.

[8]  G. Swennen,et al.  Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. , 2009, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[9]  Brandon Burke,et al.  Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[10]  T. Uysal,et al.  Mandibular asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[11]  G. Janson,et al.  Class II subdivision malocclusion types and evaluation of their asymmetries. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  William R Proffit,et al.  Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  G. Janson,et al.  Evaluation of asymmetries between subjects with Class II subdivision and apparent facial asymmetry and those with normal occlusion. , 2006, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.

[14]  D. Turpin Correcting the Class II subdivision malocclusion. , 2005, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.

[15]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Relation between vertical facial morphology and jaw muscle activity in healthy young men. , 2003, Progress in orthodontics.

[16]  G. Janson,et al.  Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  Charles J. Burstone,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment planning ofpatients with asymmetries , 1998 .

[18]  S. Bishara,et al.  Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[19]  C. Sadowsky,et al.  Mandibular skeletal and dental asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusions. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[20]  E. Begole,et al.  Facial and dental arch asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusion. , 1988, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  W J Houston,et al.  The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[22]  P. D. Lewis The deviated midline. , 1976, American Journal of Orthodontics.