A benchmark for chromatin binding measurements in live cells

Live-cell measurement of protein binding to chromatin allows probing cellular biochemistry in physiological conditions, which are difficult to mimic in vitro. However, different studies have yielded widely discrepant predictions, and so it remains uncertain how to make the measurements accurately. To establish a benchmark we measured binding of the transcription factor p53 to chromatin by three approaches: fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and single-molecule tracking (SMT). Using new procedures to analyze the SMT data and to guide the FRAP and FCS analysis, we show how all three approaches yield similar estimates for both the fraction of p53 molecules bound to chromatin (only about 20%) and the residence time of these bound molecules (∼1.8 s). We also apply these procedures to mutants in p53 chromatin binding. Our results support the model that p53 locates specific sites by first binding at sequence-independent sites.

[1]  J. Westwater,et al.  The Mathematics of Diffusion. , 1957 .

[2]  G. Barton.  The Mathematics of Diffusion 2nd edn , 1975 .

[3]  M. Edidin,et al.  Micrometer-scale domains in fibroblast plasma membranes , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  D. Grier,et al.  Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies , 1996 .

[5]  A. Murray,et al.  Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells , 1997, Current Biology.

[6]  T. Misteli,et al.  High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus , 2000, Nature.

[7]  J. McNally,et al.  The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells. , 2000, Science.

[8]  Hiroshi Kimura,et al.  Kinetics of Core Histones in Living Human Cells , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  R. Iggo,et al.  Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis fails to support the latency model for regulation of p53 DNA binding activity in vivo , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Kinetic modelling approaches to in vivo imaging , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  T. Kues,et al.  Single Molecule Motion Perpendicular to the Focal Plane of a Microscope: Application to Splicing Factor Dynamics within the Cell Nucleus , 2002 .

[12]  T. Misteli,et al.  A Kinetic Framework for a Mammalian RNA Polymerase in Vivo , 2002, Science.

[13]  Hiroshi Kimura,et al.  The transcription cycle of RNA polymerase II in living cells , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  Chen Chen,et al.  Using single-particle tracking to study nuclear trafficking of viral genes. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Global Nature of Dynamic Protein-Chromatin Interactions In Vivo: Three-Dimensional Genome Scanning and Dynamic Interaction Networks of Chromatin Proteins , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[16]  R. Pego,et al.  Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Uri Alon,et al.  Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[18]  Cem Elbi,et al.  Ligand-Specific Dynamics of the Progesterone Receptor in Living Cells and during Chromatin Remodeling In Vitro , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[19]  Adriaan B. Houtsmuller,et al.  Antiandrogens prevent stable DNA-binding of the androgen receptor , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[20]  K. Rosenke,et al.  An intact sequence-specific DNA-binding domain is required for human cytomegalovirus-mediated sequestration of p53 and may promote in vivo binding to the viral genome during infection. , 2006, Virology.

[21]  V. Buschmann,et al.  Intranuclear binding kinetics and mobility of single native U1 snRNP particles in living cells. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  W. Webb,et al.  Dynamics of heat shock factor association with native gene loci in living cells , 2006, Nature.

[23]  Peter Hinow,et al.  The DNA binding activity of p53 displays reaction-diffusion kinetics. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[24]  Gioacchino Natoli,et al.  A hyper‐dynamic equilibrium between promoter‐bound and nucleoplasmic dimers controls NF‐κB‐dependent gene activity , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[25]  K. Wood,et al.  The HaloTag: a novel technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.

[26]  J. Elf,et al.  Probing Transcription Factor Dynamics at the Single-Molecule Level in a Living Cell , 2007, Science.

[27]  M. Tamura,et al.  Analysis of intranuclear binding process of glucocorticoid receptor using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy , 2007, FEBS letters.

[28]  X. Darzacq,et al.  In vivo dynamics of RNA polymerase II transcription , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[29]  Xiao-lun Wu,et al.  Stick-and-diffuse and caged diffusion: a comparison of two models of synaptic vesicle dynamics. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[30]  Paul Wach,et al.  Evidence for a common mode of transcription factor interaction with chromatin as revealed by improved quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[31]  Paul R. Selvin,et al.  Single-molecule techniques : a laboratory manual , 2008 .

[32]  M. Tokunaga,et al.  Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells , 2008, Nature Methods.

[33]  Jan Ellenberg,et al.  Molecular crowding affects diffusion and binding of nuclear proteins in heterochromatin and reveals the fractal organization of chromatin , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[34]  T. Misteli,et al.  Transcription dynamics. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[35]  M. Dyba,et al.  In vivo labeling method using a genetic construct for nanoscale resolution microscopy. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[36]  Davide Mazza,et al.  Direct measurement of association and dissociation rates of DNA binding in live cells by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[37]  M. Ueda,et al.  Statistical analysis of lateral diffusion and multistate kinetics in single-molecule imaging. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Sanjay Tyagi,et al.  Balbiani ring mRNPs diffuse through and bind to clusters of large intranuclear molecular structures. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[39]  Davide Mazza,et al.  FRAP and kinetic modeling in the analysis of nuclear protein dynamics: what do we really know? , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[40]  U. Kubitscheck,et al.  Single ovalbumin molecules exploring nucleoplasm and nucleoli of living cell nuclei. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[41]  A. Kenworthy,et al.  A quantitative approach to analyze binding diffusion kinetics by confocal FRAP. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[42]  J. McNally,et al.  Cross-validating FRAP and FCS to quantify the impact of photobleaching on in vivo binding estimates. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[43]  Antoine M. van Oijen,et al.  A single-molecule characterization of p53 search on DNA , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  The quantitative proteome of a human cell line , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[45]  Hendrik G. Stunnenberg,et al.  Role of p53 Serine 46 in p53 Target Gene Regulation , 2011, PloS one.

[46]  J. McNally,et al.  Fast transcription rates of RNA polymerase II in human cells , 2011, EMBO reports.

[47]  Bin Wu,et al.  Real-Time Observation of Transcription Initiation and Elongation on an Endogenous Yeast Gene , 2011, Science.

[48]  U. Vinkemeier,et al.  Activated STAT1 transcription factors conduct distinct saltatory movements in the cell nucleus. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[49]  J. Hofkens,et al.  The transcriptional co-activator LEDGF/p75 displays a dynamic scan-and-lock mechanism for chromatin tethering , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[50]  J. Klafter,et al.  Accurate Quantification of Diffusion and Binding Kinetics of Non‐integral Membrane Proteins by FRAP , 2011, Traffic.

[51]  Aubrey V. Weigel,et al.  Ergodic and nonergodic processes coexist in the plasma membrane as observed by single-molecule tracking , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Lars Hufnagel,et al.  Quantitative fluorescence imaging of protein diffusion and interaction in living cells , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[53]  J. Manfredi,et al.  p53 Basic C Terminus Regulates p53 Functions through DNA Binding Modulation of Subset of Target Genes* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  R. Roeder,et al.  p53 requires an intact C-terminal domain for DNA binding and transactivation. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  Monika Tsai-Pflugfelder,et al.  Targeted INO80 enhances subnuclear chromatin movement and ectopic homologous recombination. , 2012, Genes & development.