Social participation and life satisfaction of peoples during the COVID-19 home confinement: the ECLB-COVID19 multicenter study

Abstract Background Public health recommendations and governmental measures during the COVID-19 pandemic have enforced numerous restrictions on daily living including social distancing, isolation and home confinement. While these measures are imperative to mitigate spreading of COVID-19, the impact of these restrictions on psychosocial health is undefined. Therefore, an international online survey was launched in April 2020 in seven languages to elucidate the behavioral and lifestyle consequences of COVID-19 restrictions. This report presents the preliminary results from the first thousand responders on social participation and life satisfaction. Methods Thirty-five research organisations from Europe, North-Africa, Western Asia and the Americas promoted the survey through their networks to the general society, in English, German, French, Arabic, Spanish, Portuguese, and Slovenian languages. Questions were presented in a differential format with questions related to responses before and during confinement conditions. Results 1047 replies (54% women) from Asia (36%), Africa (40%), Europe (21%) and other (3%) were included in the analysis. Preliminary findings revealed psychosocial strain during the enforced COVID-19 home confinement. In particular, large decreases in the amount of social activity through family (58%), friends/neighbors (44.9%) or entertainment (46.7%) were triggered by the enforced confinement. These negative effects on social participation were also associated with lower satisfaction (-30.5%) during the confinement period. Conversely, social contact score through digital technologies has significantly increased (p<0.001) during the confinement period with more individuals (24.8%) being socially connected through digital technology. Conclusion These preliminary findings elucidate the risk of psychosocial strain during the current home confinement period. Therefore, in order to mitigate the negative psychosocial effects of home confinement, implementation of national strategies focused on promoting social inclusion through technology-based solution is urgently needed.

[1]  M. Marinucci,et al.  Forced Social Isolation and Mental Health: A Study on 1,006 Italians Under COVID-19 Lockdown , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[2]  A. Rauch,et al.  Unprecedented disruption of lives and work: Health, distress and life satisfaction of working adults in China one month into the COVID-19 outbreak , 2020, Psychiatry Research.

[3]  Claúdio Gleidiston Lima da Silva,et al.  The emotional impact of Coronavirus 2019-nCoV (new Coronavirus disease) , 2020, Psychiatry Research.

[4]  K. Stasiak,et al.  Validation of the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ) and Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) in New Zealand help‐seeking adolescents , 2018, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[5]  S. Stewart-Brown,et al.  Evaluating and establishing national norms for mental wellbeing using the short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS): findings from the Health Survey for England , 2016, Quality of Life Research.

[6]  J. Gunn,et al.  Evaluation of the Social Participation Questionnaire in adult patients with depressive symptoms using Rasch analysis , 2013, Quality of Life Research.

[7]  Duncan J Macfarlane,et al.  Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[8]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  How should we define health? , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Lucie Richard,et al.  Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[10]  Reza Rostami,et al.  Social Participation, Sense of Community and Social Well Being: A Study on American, Italian and Iranian University Students , 2008 .

[11]  M. K. Moran,et al.  Understanding, compliance and psychological impact of the SARS quarantine experience , 2007, Epidemiology and Infection.

[12]  Ruth M Hancock,et al.  Gender, older people and social exclusion: a gendered review and secondary analysis of the data , 2007 .

[13]  H. Litwin,et al.  The association between activity and wellbeing in later life: what really matters? , 2006, Ageing and Society.

[14]  S. Galea,et al.  SARS Control and Psychological Effects of Quarantine, Toronto, Canada , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[15]  M. Zunzunegui,et al.  Social networks and self-rated health in two French-speaking Canadian community dwelling populations over 65. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[16]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  Sheryl Zimmerman,et al.  Social engagement and its relationship to service provision in residential care and assisted living , 2003 .

[18]  Rebecca L Utz,et al.  The effect of widowhood on older adults' social participation: an evaluation of activity, disengagement, and continuity theories. , 2002, The Gerontologist.

[19]  Active Ageing: A Policy Framework , 2002 .

[20]  L. Peirson,et al.  The role of power and control in children's lives: An ecological analysis of pathways toward wellness, resilience and problems , 2001 .

[21]  L. Berkman,et al.  From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[22]  P. Herschbach,et al.  Questions on Life Satisfaction (FLZM) - A Short Questionnaire for Assessing Subjective Quality of Life , 2000 .

[23]  L. Berkman,et al.  Social Disengagement and Incident Cognitive Decline in Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  Daniel J Buysse,et al.  The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research , 1989, Psychiatry Research.

[25]  K. Morgan,et al.  Mental Health and Psychological Well-being Among the Old and the Very Old Living at Home , 1987, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[26]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[27]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[28]  C. Borland,et al.  Effect Size , 2019, SAGE Research Methods Foundations.

[29]  J. Smetana,et al.  Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  H. Kelman,et al.  Interests, relationships, identities: three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  G. Pretty,et al.  Determinants of Subjective Quality of Life Among Rural Adolescents: A Developmental Perspective , 2003 .

[32]  D. Bassett.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[33]  A. Kalache,et al.  Active ageing: a policy framework. , 2003, Advances in gerontology = Uspekhi gerontologii.