An implementation case for the performance appraisal and promotion ranking

Systematic performance appraisal and ranking of candidates applying for promotion is important in strategic human resource management. In military organizations, it is particularly crucial to evaluate candidates for promotion and placement because their functions directly impact operations and national security. This paper proposes a framework that can be used to evaluate candidates based on unique performance evaluation criteria. The framework allows determination of the most qualified candidate by considering both quantitative scores and qualitative characteristics of his or her performance. It also ensures fairness, objectivity and transparency since evaluators first determine the metrics of performance evaluation as well as the weighting among the metrics before aggregating the appraisal scores to determine the ranking of each candidate. The ranking is determined by applying the fuzzy set operations and membership function. In order to decide the promotion rank of candidates, we propose a fuzzy ranking procedure in conjunction with a novel integrated performance appraisal and promotion ranking system.

[1]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[2]  J. Buckley Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers , 1985 .

[3]  G. Bortolan,et al.  A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy subsets , 1985 .

[4]  Shan-Huo Chen Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set , 1985 .

[5]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[6]  R. Goetschel,et al.  Elementary fuzzy calculus , 1986 .

[7]  D. Dubois,et al.  The mean value of a fuzzy number , 1987 .

[8]  E. Lee,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events , 1988 .

[9]  F. A. Lootsma,et al.  Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons , 1989 .

[10]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making — An Overview , 1992 .

[11]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods , 1996, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[12]  K. A. Conrad,et al.  Current Perspectives in Industrial/Organizational Psychology , 1997 .

[13]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[15]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Elizabeth Chambers,et al.  The war for talent , 2001, Tijdschrift voor HRM.

[17]  Soheil Sadi-Nezhad,et al.  Ranking fuzzy numbers by preference ratio , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  D. Borst,et al.  Human resource management. , 2001, Occupational medicine.

[19]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Selecting IS personnel use fuzzy GDSS based on metric distance method , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management , 2006 .