Investigation of the integration process of dental implants by means of a numerical analysis of dynamic response.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this work was to present a preliminary numerical analysis of the integration process of dental implants using a finite element simulation of the dynamic response following impulse excitation. Assessment of the osseointegration process has been previously examined using a numerical approach by calculating the natural frequency of a cantilever attached to the implant. The methodology adopted in this work allows a direct measurement of the implant response following impulse loading and avoids the addition of a bulky cantilever set-up. METHODS The geometric configuration was obtained by averaging the coordinate data from tomographic scans of 14 mandibles. The materials properties were approximated from experimental analysis performed on trabecular and cortical bone tissue. A load was applied to the top of the implant in one direction resulting in an initial displacement. The implant was then freed and allowed to vibrate over approximately 10 cycles. Three fixity conditions were assumed by changing the properties of the surrounding bone ranging from full integration to a poorly integrated implant typical of the situation during bone healing following surgery. The results of the three fixity conditions were compared by calculating the fundamental displacement amplitudes and frequencies of the vibrating impact. RESULTS The calculated results indicated that the implant vibrated at a predominant frequency when partially integrated with a displacement principally in the direction of the applied impulse. However, when the implant was fully integrated a more complex vibration pattern ensued, suggesting the superposition of two or more fundamentals. SIGNIFICANCE Attention has been paid to the formulation of the numerical model for validation purposes as well as a reliable reference for the optimum interpretation of the experimental data. In this way it was possible to establish a simulation procedure to investigate the response of the tissues surrounding the implant and their properties at different stages of healing. It should be pointed out that the numerical procedures represented a valid preliminary approach to the problem and were capable of indicating a guide to the optimum design of the experimental apparatus for measurement of displacement and frequency in vivo.

[1]  J M Jurist,et al.  Three models of the vibrating ulna. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  J Chen,et al.  Mechanical simulation of the human mandible with and without an endosseous implant. , 1994, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  F. Bosman,et al.  A three-dimensional, finite-element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. , 1993, Archives of oral biology.

[5]  E. Meroi,et al.  Pin-Bone Interface: A Geometric and Material Non-Linear Analysis , 1991 .

[6]  P. Branemark Osseointegration and its experimental background. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  A. N. Natali,et al.  Nonlinear interaction phenomena between bone and pin , 1992 .

[8]  J L Lewis A dynamic model of a healing fractured long bone. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  F. Bosman,et al.  A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants. , 1993, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[10]  D T Davy,et al.  A computational method for stress analysis of adaptive elastic materials with a view toward applications in strain-induced bone remodeling. , 1984, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  G L Kinzel,et al.  A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  E. Meroi,et al.  A review of the biomechanical properties of bone as a material. , 1989, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[13]  D H Kohn,et al.  Micromechanics of implant/tissue interfaces. , 1992, The Journal of oral implantology.

[14]  N Meredith,et al.  Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  Richter Ej Basic biomechanics of dental implants in prosthetic dentistry , 1989 .

[16]  M Azarbal,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cantilever fixed partial denture. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  H. Hansson,et al.  Interface analysis of titanium and zirconium bone implants. , 1985, Biomaterials.

[18]  L Sennerby,et al.  The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  V. Goel,et al.  Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: a finite element stress analysis. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[20]  T Albrektsson,et al.  An ultrastructural characterization of the interface between bone and sputtered titanium or stainless steel surfaces. , 1986, Biomaterials.

[21]  P. Branemark,et al.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Supplementum.

[22]  M W Bidez,et al.  Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles. , 1992, The Journal of oral implantology.