The road forward for upper-extremity rehabilitation robotics

Abstract Despite concerted efforts over the last three decades, upper-extremity robotic rehabilitation has yet to reach its full potential. We assert that assuming the goal of robotic rehabilitation is to automate conventional therapy may have led to overly narrow research directions and to mixed results from clinical studies. Recontextualizing this assumption opens promising research avenues for roboticists. Breaking the robotic device design loop and instead seeking out ‘big data’ opportunities has the potential to identify promising robot-mediated interventions. This will require a shift in roboticists’ attitudes towards participating in neuroscience and clinical research. By expanding assessment beyond kinematics, robotic devices can provide clinicians with a more complete picture of impairment and recovery. We discuss the current assumptions in greater detail, and point towards promising research in these revised directions.

[1]  Yuki Ueyama,et al.  System identification of neural mechanisms from trial-by-trial motor behaviour: modelling of learning, impairment and recovery , 2017, Adv. Robotics.

[2]  Parvin Mousavi,et al.  Robot-based assessment of motor and proprioceptive function identifies biomarkers for prediction of functional independence measures , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Robot-assisted assessment of vibration perception and localization on the hand , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[4]  C. Lang,et al.  Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation: prescribing motor therapy after stroke. , 2015, Current opinion in neurology.

[5]  Adam Kirton,et al.  Kinesthetic deficits after perinatal stroke: robotic measurement in hemiparetic children , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  Anthony D Whetton,et al.  THOC5/FMIP, an mRNA export TREX complex protein, is essential for hematopoietic primitive cell survival in vivo , 2010, BMC Biology.

[7]  Danna Zhou,et al.  d. , 1840, Microbial pathogenesis.

[8]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Using Contact Forces and Robot Arm Accelerations to Automatically Rate Surgeon Skill at Peg Transfer , 2017, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[9]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  A Robotic Platform for 3D Forelimb Rehabilitation with Rats , 2019, 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[10]  Ashish D. Deshpande,et al.  Assessing Wrist Movement With Robotic Devices , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  A. Atreja,et al.  Remote Patient Monitoring in IBD: Current State and Future Directions , 2018, Current Gastroenterology Reports.

[12]  Jennifer A. Semrau,et al.  A composite robotic-based measure of upper limb proprioception , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[13]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Breaking Proportional Recovery After Stroke , 2019, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  R Colombo,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation in sub-acute and chronic stroke: does spontaneous recovery have a limited impact on outcome? , 2013, NeuroRehabilitation.

[15]  N. Hogan,et al.  Comparison of Two Techniques of Robot-Aided Upper Limb Exercise Training After Stroke , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[16]  Sonja E. Findlater,et al.  Proprioception and motor performance after stroke: An examination of diffusion properties in sensory and motor pathways , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Advanced Neurotechnologies for the Restoration of Motor Function , 2020, Neuron.

[18]  T. Jones,et al.  Training in a cooperative bimanual skilled reaching task, the popcorn retrieval task, improves unimanual function after motor cortical infarcts in rats , 2020, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  H. Krebs,et al.  Robot assisted training for the upper limb after stroke (RATULS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[20]  Jingyi Wu,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for upper extremity motor impairment after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2021, Physical therapy.

[21]  S. Scott,et al.  Robotic tests for position sense and movement discrimination in the upper limb reveal that they each are highly reproducible but not correlated in healthy individuals , 2020, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[22]  A. Wing,et al.  Boosting robot-assisted rehabilitation of stroke hemiparesis by individualized selection of upper limb movements – a pilot study , 2019, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[23]  Corwin Boake,et al.  Normalized Movement Quality Measures for Therapeutic Robots Strongly Correlate With Clinical Motor Impairment Measures , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  J. Klein,et al.  Breaking It Down Is Better: Haptic Decomposition of Complex Movements Aids in Robot-Assisted Motor Learning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[26]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[27]  Shaoping Bai,et al.  A Review on Design of Upper Limb Exoskeletons , 2020, Robotics.

[28]  Vicky Chan,et al.  A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[29]  V. Dietz,et al.  Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective , 2018, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[30]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Rudimentary Dexterity Corresponds With Reduced Ability to Move in Synergy After Stroke: Evidence of Competition Between Corticoreticulospinal and Corticospinal Tracts? , 2020, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[31]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Technology-aided assessment of functionally relevant sensorimotor impairments in arm and hand of post-stroke individuals , 2020, bioRxiv.

[32]  R. Gassert,et al.  Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke , 2020, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[33]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  On the analysis of movement smoothness , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[34]  Vicky Chan,et al.  Robotic Assistance for Training Finger Movement Using a Hebbian Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[35]  Nicolas Schweighofer,et al.  Dissociating motor learning from recovery in exoskeleton training post-stroke , 2018, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[36]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor learning , 2010, Current Biology.

[37]  Leeanne M. Carey,et al.  Impaired Touch Discrimination After Stroke: A Quantiative Test , 1997 .

[38]  Po Yang,et al.  Examining sensor-based physical activity recognition and monitoring for healthcare using Internet of Things: A systematic review , 2018, Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

[39]  Stefano Mazzoleni,et al.  Upper limb robotics applied to neurorehabilitation: An overview of clinical practice. , 2017, NeuroRehabilitation.

[40]  Ziheng Wang,et al.  Deep learning with convolutional neural network for objective skill evaluation in robot-assisted surgery , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[41]  Jennifer A. Semrau,et al.  Differential loss of position sense and kinesthesia in sub-acute stroke , 2019, Cortex.

[42]  M. Caleo Rehabilitation and plasticity following stroke: Insights from rodent models , 2015, Neuroscience.

[43]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Reliability, validity, and clinical feasibility of a rapid and objective assessment of post-stroke deficits in hand proprioception , 2018, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[44]  Anne Deblock-Bellamy,et al.  Quantification of upper limb position sense using an exoskeleton and a virtual reality display , 2018, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[45]  Eftim Zdravevski,et al.  Literature on Wearable Technology for Connected Health: Scoping Review of Research Trends, Advances, and Barriers , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[46]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of robotic-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living and upper limb function after stroke , 2020, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[47]  Ranjan Sudan,et al.  Proving the Effectiveness of the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) Skills Curriculum: A Single-blinded, Multispecialty, Multi-institutional Randomized Control Trial. , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[48]  M. Carrozza,et al.  Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial , 2020, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[49]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[50]  Leeanne Carey,et al.  SENSe: Study of the Effectiveness of Neurorehabilitation on Sensation , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[51]  Joel Stein,et al.  The use of robots in stroke rehabilitation: A narrative review. , 2018, NeuroRehabilitation.

[52]  I. Gill,et al.  Objective Assessment of Robotic Surgical Technical Skill: A Systematic Review , 2019, The Journal of urology.

[53]  N. Hogan,et al.  A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. , 2008, NeuroRehabilitation.

[54]  Donald Hedeker,et al.  Error Augmentation Enhancing Arm Recovery in Individuals With Chronic Stroke , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[55]  P. Plummer-D’Amato,et al.  Bilateral movement therapy post-stroke: underlying mechanisms and review , 2010 .

[56]  C. Lang,et al.  Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[57]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. , 1997, Science.

[58]  J. Kleim,et al.  Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[59]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  Proprioceptive assessment in clinical settings: Evaluation of joint position sense in upper limb post-stroke using a robotic manipulator , 2017, PloS one.

[60]  Julius P. A. Dewald,et al.  Progressive Abduction Loading Therapy with Horizontal-Plane Viscous Resistance Targeting Weakness and Flexion Synergy to Treat Upper Limb Function in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2018, Front. Neurol..

[61]  L. Thijs,et al.  Effectiveness of somatosensory interventions on somatosensory, motor and functional outcomes in the upper limb post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, NeuroRehabilitation.

[62]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Q&A: Robotics as a tool to understand the brain , 2010, BMC Biology.

[63]  Jessica P McCabe,et al.  Long-Dose Intensive Therapy Is Necessary for Strong, Clinically Significant, Upper Limb Functional Gains and Retained Gains in Severe/Moderate Chronic Stroke , 2019, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[64]  Vicky Chan,et al.  Neural Correlates of Passive Position Finger Sense After Stroke , 2019, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[65]  Valentina Agostini,et al.  Feasibility of Muscle Synergy Outcomes in Clinics, Robotics, and Sports: A Systematic Review , 2018, Applied bionics and biomechanics.

[66]  N. Schweighofer,et al.  The Efficiency, Efficacy, and Retention of Task Practice in Chronic Stroke , 2020, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.