Examining the Link Between Leader Member Exchange and Subordinate Performance: The Role of Task Analyzability and Variety as Moderators

Results from afield study with 152 members of a large urban hospital indicate that the relationship between the quality of leader-member exchange (LMX) and subordinate performance is moderated by perceptions of task analyzability and variety. LMX and performance are found to be significantly related when task challenge is either very high or very low. Under these task conditions, data indicate that there is a positive link between LMX and performance such that a higher quality leader-member exchange correlates with higher levels of performance. On the other hand, analyses also reveal that when tasks are perceived to be moderately challenging, no significant relationship between LMX and performance is present. In other words, these data suggest that characteristics of the task act as moderating agents of the LMX/performance relationship. Results are discussed in terms of theory development, managerial implications, andfuture LMX research.

[1]  G. Graen,et al.  The Japanese career progress study: A 7-year follow-up. , 1984 .

[2]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Relationships Among Individual, Task Design, and Leader Behavior Variables , 1980 .

[3]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[4]  L. James,et al.  Mediators, Moderators, and Tests for Mediation. , 1984 .

[5]  George B. Graen,et al.  Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. , 1982 .

[6]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Leader Expertise as a Moderator of the Effects of Instrumental and Supportive Leader Behaviors , 1983 .

[7]  William J. Haga,et al.  A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process , 1975 .

[8]  John B. Miner,et al.  Theories of organizational behavior , 1980 .

[9]  John B. Miner,et al.  Organizational Behavior: Performance and Productivity , 1988 .

[10]  G. Graen,et al.  Job resignation as a function of role orientation and leader acceptance: A longitudinal investigation of organizational assimilation , 1977 .

[11]  P. Hersey,et al.  Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources , 1971 .

[12]  D. Duchon,et al.  Vertical dyad linkage: A longitudinal assessment of antecedents, measures, and consequences. , 1986 .

[13]  F. Fiedler.  A Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness1 , 1964 .

[14]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[15]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Task Characteristics Relationships , 1981 .

[16]  G. Graen,et al.  The effects of leader–member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. , 1982 .

[17]  G. Graen,et al.  Dysfunctional leadership styles , 1972 .

[18]  R. J. House,et al.  A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness , 1971 .

[19]  Robert C. Davis,et al.  The Achieving Society , 1962 .

[20]  J. Hackman,et al.  Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey , 1975 .

[21]  George B. Graen,et al.  Instrumentality theory and equity theory as complementary approaches in predicting the relationship of leadership and turnover among managers , 1973 .

[22]  G. Graen,et al.  The dual attachment concept: A longitudinal investigation of the combination of task characteristics and leader—member exchange☆ , 1984 .

[23]  H. P. Sims,et al.  The Measurement of Job Characteristics , 1976 .

[24]  P. Hersey,et al.  Life cycle theory of leadership. , 1979 .

[25]  Steven Kerr,et al.  Moderator Variables in Leadership Research , 1986 .

[26]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Measures of Perrow's Work Unit Technology: An Empirical Assessment and a New Scale , 1983 .

[27]  R. Campbell,et al.  A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. , 1968 .

[28]  C. Perrow.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[29]  G. Graen,et al.  Japanese management progress: Mobility into middle management. , 1988 .

[30]  G. Graen,et al.  Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. , 1980 .

[31]  G. Graen,et al.  A Role-Making Model of Leadership in Formal Organizations: A Developmental Approach , 1975 .

[32]  R. Vecchio.  A further test of leadership effects due to between-group variation and within-group variation. , 1982 .

[33]  G. Graen,et al.  Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. , 1987 .

[34]  W. Hays.  Statistics for psychologists , 1963 .

[35]  H. J. Arnold.  Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues , 1982 .

[36]  R. Liden,et al.  Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Development , 1986 .

[37]  V. Vroom,et al.  Leadership and decision-making , 1975 .

[38]  Joseph G. Rosse,et al.  Reconsidering the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. , 1983 .

[39]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[40]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process: A constructive replication. , 1985 .

[41]  George B. Graen,et al.  A Field Experimental Test of the Moderating Effects of Growth Need Strength on Productivity , 1986 .

[42]  G. Graen,et al.  Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. , 1984 .

[43]  Robert P. Vecchio,et al.  The vertical dyad linkage model of leadership: Problems and prospects , 1984 .