Prediction of improvement in skin fibrosis in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a EUSTAR analysis

Objectives Improvement of skin fibrosis is part of the natural course of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). Recognising those patients most likely to improve could help tailoring clinical management and cohort enrichment for clinical trials. In this study, we aimed to identify predictors for improvement of skin fibrosis in patients with dcSSc. Methods We performed a longitudinal analysis of the European Scleroderma Trials And Research (EUSTAR) registry including patients with dcSSc, fulfilling American College of Rheumatology criteria, baseline modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) ≥7 and follow-up mRSS at 12±2 months. The primary outcome was skin improvement (decrease in mRSS of >5 points and ≥25%) at 1 year follow-up. A respective increase in mRSS was considered progression. Candidate predictors for skin improvement were selected by expert opinion and logistic regression with bootstrap validation was applied. Results From the 919 patients included, 218 (24%) improved and 95 (10%) progressed. Eleven candidate predictors for skin improvement were analysed. The final model identified high baseline mRSS and absence of tendon friction rubs as independent predictors of skin improvement. The baseline mRSS was the strongest predictor of skin improvement, independent of disease duration. An upper threshold between 18 and 25 performed best in enriching for progressors over regressors. Conclusions Patients with advanced skin fibrosis at baseline and absence of tendon friction rubs are more likely to regress in the next year than patients with milder skin fibrosis. These evidence-based data can be implemented in clinical trial design to minimise the inclusion of patients who would regress under standard of care.

[1]  U. Müller-Ladner,et al.  Prediction of worsening of skin fibrosis in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis using the EUSTAR database. , 2015, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  M. Mayes,et al.  Correlates and Responsiveness to Change of Measures of Skin and Musculoskeletal Disease in Early Diffuse Systemic Sclerosis , 2014, Arthritis care & research.

[3]  M. Baron,et al.  Estimating Benefits from Immunesuppressive Treatment in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis: Data from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group * , 2014 .

[4]  U. Müller-Ladner,et al.  Ten years EULAR Scleroderma Research and Trials (EUSTAR): what has been achieved? , 2013, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[5]  M. Mayes,et al.  Patterns and predictors of change in outcome measures in clinical trials in scleroderma: an individual patient meta-analysis of 629 subjects with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. , 2012, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  U. Müller-Ladner,et al.  Update on the profile of the EUSTAR cohort: an analysis of the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group database , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  R. Lafyatis Application of Biomarkers to Clinical Trials in Systemic Sclerosis , 2012, Current Rheumatology Reports.

[8]  D. Furst,et al.  Course of the modified Rodnan skin thickness score in systemic sclerosis clinical trials: analysis of three large multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trials. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  P. Merkel,et al.  Outcome measures in systemic sclerosis: An update on instruments and current research , 2007, Current rheumatology reports.

[10]  U. Müller-Ladner,et al.  Clinical risk assessment of organ manifestations in systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials And Research group database , 2007, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  Richard W. Martin,et al.  Minimally important difference in diffuse systemic sclerosis: results from the d-penicillamine study , 2006, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  P. Clements,et al.  The health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) is strongly predictive of good outcome in early diffuse scleroderma: results from an analysis of two randomized controlled trials in early diffuse scleroderma. , 2004, Rheumatology.

[13]  T. Medsger,et al.  Improvement in skin thickening in systemic sclerosis associated with improved survival. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  Richard W. Martin,et al.  High-dose versus low-dose D-penicillamine in early diffuse systemic sclerosis: analysis of a two-year, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[15]  T. Medsger,et al.  Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[16]  D. Furst,et al.  D-penicillamine is not an effective treatment in systemic sclerosis. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[17]  S. Yeoman,et al.  European Scleroderma Study Group to define disease activity criteria for systemic sclerosis. IV. Assessment of skin thickening by modified Rodnan skin score , 2022 .