Ecosystem services from community-based forestry in Nepal: realising local and global benefits.

Community-based Forestry (CBF) is now a popular approach for landscape restoration, forest management, biodiversity conservation and support for rural livelihoods worldwide. The Himalayan country Nepal has been at the forefront of CBF for over four decades, with almost 40% of the total population directly involved in protecting and managing more than 32% of the country’s forested land. However, in the past, the focus of CBF in Nepal was the provision of goods for local subsistence, and there has been limited analysis of the role of CBF in providing ecosystem services (ES) from restored forest landscapes. Based on material drawn from a literature review and a stakeholders’ workshop, this paper analyses changes in Nepalese forest policies to provide a more holistic framework for CBF that provides a wider range of ES and to potentially underpin payments for ecosystem services in Nepal. The analysis indicates that Nepal’s forest policy and practices are still dominated by a narrowly conceived notion of forest management that does not accommodate the holistic concept of ES. The study illustrates that CBF provides many ES from local to global benefits as result of forest restoration. For example, timber, firewood, food, and water have local importance, while climate regulation, flood/erosion control, and habitat improvement have global importance. Many innovative cases are emerging in the long journey of CBF in Nepal that demonstrate more diverse management strategies, new forms of tenure rights and autonomy in institutional spaces. These can potentially provide a catalytic platform for the wider adoption of the ES framework in CBF regimes, in order to focus and reward forest management more directly for the provision of services such as water, biodiversity, climate regulation and recreation. Consequently, this study discusses the issues and challenges that are impeding the implementation of the ES concept in Nepal and suggests some ways forward.

[1]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[2]  N. Stork,et al.  Anthropogenic Decline of Ecosystem Services Threatens the Integrity of the Unique Hyrcanian (Caspian) Forests in Northern Iran , 2016 .

[3]  E. Oteros‐Rozas,et al.  Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level , 2013 .

[4]  R. Keenan,et al.  Social production of vulnerability to climate change in the rural middle hills of Nepal , 2016 .

[5]  Kabir Uddin,et al.  Implications of land cover change on ecosystems services and people’s dependency: A case study from the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal , 2016 .

[6]  J. Burnham.  Scopus database: a review , 2006, Biomedical digital libraries.

[7]  Faisal Mueen Qamer,et al.  Measuring impacts of community forestry program through repeat photography and satellite remote sensing in the Dolakha district of Nepal. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Rodney J. Keenan,et al.  Climate change impacts and adaptation in forest management: a review , 2015, Annals of Forest Science.

[9]  S. Adhikari,et al.  Incentives for community participation in the governance and management of common property resources: the case of community forest management in Nepal , 2014 .

[10]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[11]  Teeb.  The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations , 2017 .

[12]  M. Walpole,et al.  What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal , 2014 .

[13]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[14]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy , 2014, Ecology letters.

[15]  K. Esler,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming ecosystem services in development planning: perspectives from a landscape level , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  Rodney J. Keenan,et al.  Planted forests and water in perspective , 2007 .

[17]  Christopher A. Thoms.  Community control of resources and the challenge of improving local livelihoods: A critical examination of community forestry in Nepal , 2008 .

[18]  M. Ruckelshaus,et al.  Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  D. Richardson,et al.  Identifying priority areas for ecosystem service management in South African grasslands. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  J. Nel,et al.  Navigating complexity through knowledge coproduction: Mainstreaming ecosystem services into disaster risk reduction , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Fergus Lyon,et al.  Transdisciplinary environmental research: building trust across professional cultures , 2013 .

[22]  Konstantinos Tzanakakis,et al.  The Railway Track and Its Long Term Behaviour: A Handbook for a Railway Track of High Quality , 2013 .

[23]  K. Harashina,et al.  Living close to forests enhances people׳s perception of ecosystem services in a forest–agricultural landscape of West Java, Indonesia , 2014 .

[24]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[25]  N. Chettri,et al.  The evolution of ecosystem services: A time series and discourse-centered analysis , 2015 .

[26]  M. Brockhaus,et al.  Land tenure and REDD+: The good, the bad and the ugly , 2013 .

[27]  H. Baral,et al.  Payment for ecosystem services: possible instrument for managing ecosystem services in Nepal , 2014 .

[28]  R. Keenan,et al.  Delocalizing Communities: Changing Forms of Community Engagement in Natural Resources Governance , 2016 .

[29]  P. Pert,et al.  Assessing regulating and provisioning ecosystem services in a contrasting tropical forest landscape , 2016 .

[30]  R. Pokharel,et al.  Good Governance Assessment in Nepal's Community Forestry , 2013 .

[31]  R. Kunwar,et al.  Medicinal plants, traditional medicine, markets and management in far-west Nepal , 2013, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine.

[32]  E. Eckholm,et al.  Losing Ground: Environmental Stress and World Food Prospects , 1976 .

[33]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation Planning as a Transdisciplinary Process , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[34]  H. Laudon,et al.  The effect of trees on preferential flow and soil infiltrability in an agroforestry parkland in semiarid Burkina Faso , 2014, Water resources research.

[35]  A. Gurung,et al.  Community based forest management in Nepal: Opportunities and Challenges , 2011 .

[36]  T. Tuttolomondo,et al.  A survey of wild plant species for food use in Sicily (Italy) – results of a 3-year study in four Regional Parks , 2016, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine.

[37]  Jan Staes,et al.  ‘The Matrix Reloaded': A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services , 2015 .

[38]  Mohammed Ibrahim,et al.  THEMATIC ANALYSIS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF ITS PROCESS AND EVALUATION , 2012 .

[39]  N. Crossman,et al.  Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units , 2012 .

[40]  L. Persha,et al.  Community forestry in Nepal: a policy innovation for local livelihoods , 2009 .

[41]  N. Stork,et al.  Measuring and managing ecosystem goods and services in changing landscapes: a south-east Australian perspective , 2014 .

[42]  T. Maraseni,et al.  Tree Species Diversity in Community Managed and National Park Forests in the Mid-Hills of Central Nepal , 2014 .

[43]  E. Webb,et al.  A Review of Forest Policies, Institutions, and Changes in the Resource Condition in Nepal , 2004 .

[44]  H. Purnomo,et al.  Rights and Wellbeing: An Analytical Approach to Global Case Comparison of Community Forestry , 2012 .

[45]  Ganesh Acharya,et al.  Livelihood Option from Minor Forest Produce: Context of Non Timber Forest Product and Poverty Reduction in Mid Hills of Nepal , 2009 .

[46]  R. P. Chaudhary,et al.  Forest ecosystem services and biodiversity in contrasting Himalayan forest management systems , 2013, Environmental Conservation.

[47]  D. Race,et al.  REDD+ and Community Forestry: Implications for Local Communities and Forest Management- a Case Study from Nepal , 2014 .

[48]  Gregory Brown.  Mapping Spatial Attributes in Survey Research for Natural Resource Management: Methods and Applications , 2004 .

[49]  P. Pert,et al.  Ecosystem services capacity across heterogeneous forest types: understanding the interactions and suggesting pathways for sustaining multiple ecosystem services. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[50]  Bill Fleming,et al.  A watershed conservation success story in Nepal: land use changes over 30 years. , 2009 .

[51]  D Biggs,et al.  Soft Systems Thinking and Social Learning for Adaptive Management , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[52]  K. Wallace.  Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions , 2007 .

[53]  P. Sutton,et al.  Changes in the global value of ecosystem services , 2014 .

[54]  B. Agarwal.  Does Women's Proportional Strength Affect their Participation? Governing Local Forests in South Asia , 2010 .

[55]  D. Gritten,et al.  An Uneven Playing Field: Regulatory Barriers to Communities Making a Living from the Timber from Their Forests-Examples from Cambodia, Nepal and Vietnam , 2015 .

[56]  Petina L. Pert,et al.  A review of ecosystem services research in Australia reveals a gap in integrating climate change and impacts on ecosystem services , 2014 .

[57]  Malte Busch,et al.  Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services , 2012 .

[58]  A. Larson.  Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: Lessons for REDD+ , 2011 .

[59]  H. Ojha,et al.  Can authority change through deliberative politics? Lessons from the four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal , 2014 .

[60]  Konstantinos Tzanakakis,et al.  Measuring the Performance , 2013 .

[61]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy , 2012 .

[62]  H. Ojha.  Techno-bureaucratic Doxa and Challenges for Deliberative Governance: The Case of Community Forestry Policy and Practice in Nepal , 2006 .

[63]  Golam Rasul,et al.  The economic value of wetland ecosystem services: evidence from the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. , 2015 .

[64]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Changing Governance of the World's Forests , 2008, Science.

[65]  E. Webb,et al.  GIS Assessment of Land Use/Land Cover Changes Associated With Community Forestry Implementation in the Middle Hills of Nepal , 2002 .

[66]  M. Hauser,et al.  Commercial Management of Non-Timber Forest Products in Nepal's Community Forest Users Groups: Who Benefits? , 2011 .

[67]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[68]  R. Rai,et al.  Assessing community values to support mapping of ecosystem services in the Koshi river basin, Nepal , 2015 .

[69]  R. Fisher,et al.  Villagers, forests, and foresters: The philosophy, process, and practice of community forestry in Nepal , 1991 .

[70]  L. Herrera,et al.  Ecosystem services research in contrasting socio-ecological contexts of Argentina: Critical assessment and future directions , 2015 .

[71]  E. Corbera,et al.  Building Institutions to Trade Ecosystem Services: Marketing Forest Carbon in Mexico , 2008 .

[72]  R. Cowling,et al.  An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  Ganesh P. Shivakoti,et al.  Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a mountain watershed in Nepal , 2003 .

[74]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Ecosystem services research in Latin America: The state of the art , 2012 .

[75]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments , 2009 .

[76]  J. Sah,et al.  Effects of Different Management Practices on Stand Composition and Species Diversity in Subtropical Forests in Nepal: Implications of Community Participation in Biodiversity Conservation , 2015 .

[77]  E. Eckholm,et al.  The Deterioration of Mountain Environments: Ecological stress in the highlands of Asia, Latin America, and Africa takes a mounting social toll. , 1975, Science.

[78]  S. Polasky,et al.  Setting the bar: Standards for ecosystem services , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming , 2014 .

[80]  L. Wallace,et al.  Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2016 .

[81]  Neville D. Crossman,et al.  Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services , 2012 .

[82]  Arun Agrawal,et al.  Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[83]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.  Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[84]  Manasi Kumar,et al.  Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective , 2008 .

[85]  Arun Agrawal,et al.  Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya , 2006 .

[86]  Kathleen M. MacQueen,et al.  Introduction to Applied Thematic Analysis , 2012 .

[87]  D. Lang,et al.  A review of urban ecosystem services: six key challenges for future research , 2015 .

[88]  A. Kulkarni,et al.  Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. , 2009, JAMA.

[89]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[90]  BennerJordan,et al.  Social contracts and community forestry: how can we design forest policies and tenure arrangements to generate local benefits? , 2014 .

[91]  E. Sills,et al.  Linking forest tenure reform, environmental compliance, and incentives: lessons from REDD+ initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon , 2014 .

[92]  N. Stork,et al.  Ecosystem services and livelihoods in a changing climate: Understanding local adaptations in the Upper Koshi, Nepal , 2015 .

[93]  U. Shrestha,et al.  Biodiversity conservation in community forests of Nepal: Rhetoric and reality , 2010 .

[94]  R. Keenan,et al.  Participatory assessment and mapping of ecosystem services in a data-poor region: Case study of community-managed forests in central Nepal , 2015 .

[95]  E. H. Roberts,et al.  International experiences of community forestry and its potential in forest management for Australia and New Zealand , 2003 .

[96]  U. Shrestha,et al.  Assessments of ecosystem service indicators and stakeholder's willingness to pay for selected ecosystem services in the Chure region of Nepal , 2016 .

[97]  G. Dahal,et al.  Community forestry policy and its economic implications: an experience from Nepal , 2008 .

[98]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services , 2012 .

[99]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The impact of proxy‐based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services , 2010 .

[100]  G. Daily,et al.  Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services , 2011 .

[101]  M. Bonell,et al.  Negative trade-off between changes in vegetation water use and infiltration recovery after reforesting degraded pasture land in the Nepalese Lesser Himalaya , 2014 .

[102]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[103]  Z. Ouyang,et al.  Evaluating value of natural landscapes in China , 2016, Chinese Geographical Science.

[104]  N. Stork,et al.  Spatial assessment of ecosystem goods and services in complex production landscapes: A case study from south-eastern Australia , 2013 .

[105]  K. Esler,et al.  Exploring the Gap between Ecosystem Service Research and Management in Development Planning , 2014 .

[106]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services , 2013 .

[107]  J. Lovett,et al.  Local benefits from community forests in the middle hills of Nepal , 2007 .

[108]  B. Burkhard,et al.  Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: A case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein , 2010 .

[109]  Sabine Kasel,et al.  Economic evaluation of ecosystem goods and services under different landscape management scenarios , 2014 .

[110]  R. Hinde,et al.  The Possibility of Cooperation@@@Cooperation: The Basis of Sociability.@@@Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior.@@@Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. , 1990 .

[111]  R. Bussmann,et al.  Ecological status and traditional knowledge of medicinal plants in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary of Garhwal Himalaya, India , 2013, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine.

[112]  B. Baral.  Who benefits? : Decentralised forest governance through community forestry in Nepal , 2014 .

[113]  Lynn Scarlett,et al.  Ecosystem services and resource management: Institutional issues, challenges, and opportunities in the public sector , 2015 .

[114]  Laurence Smith,et al.  The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[115]  M. Bonell,et al.  Reforesting severely degraded grassland in the Lesser Himalaya of Nepal: Effects on soil hydraulic conductivity and overland flow production , 2013 .

[116]  B. Adhikari,et al.  Designing payments for ecosystem services schemes: some considerations , 2013 .

[117]  S. Singh,et al.  Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the performance of 40 case studies , 2016 .

[118]  B. Pokharel,et al.  From green to REDD, from aid to trade: translating the forest carbon concept into practice. , 2009 .

[119]  K. Schreckenberg,et al.  Improving the Benefits to the Poor from Community Forestry in the Churia Region of Nepal , 2009 .

[120]  Y. Uprety,et al.  Traditional use and management of NTFPs in Kangchenjunga Landscape: implications for conservation and livelihoods , 2016, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine.

[121]  Rocco Scolozzi,et al.  Ecosystem services-based SWOT analysis of protected areas for conservation strategies. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[122]  R. Keenan,et al.  Local actions for the common good: Can the application of the ecosystem services concept generate improved societal outcomes from natural resource management? , 2016 .

[123]  M. Feldman,et al.  Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[124]  Anthony G. Tuckett,et al.  Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher’s experience , 2005, Contemporary nurse.

[125]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.