Exploring Indie Game Development: Team Practices and Social Experiences in A Creativity-Centric Technology Community

The emergence of various interest-based online communities has led to the popularity of new forms of distributed creative teamwork such as citizen science, crowdsourcing, and open source software development. These new phenomena further complicate the context and content of distributed creative teamwork: what are the characteristics of these new forms of creative teams? And how do they shape people’s perceptions and social experiences of distributed creative teams? In this paper, we report our empirical research of the team characteristics and practices in a creativity-centric technology community (i.e., independent [indie] game development) in hopes of exploring these questions. Our findings show that 1) indie game development teams are formed upon shared aspirations and use various strategies to collaborate with friends or online strangers; and their team practices are achieved through a balance between individual creativity and collective vision as well as a collaborative learning for problem solving and self-improvement; and 2) these teams mediate new forms of social interaction and collaborative experiences, featuring a mix of online comradery and weak social ties, and a mix of self-confidence and self-confliction. Using this new dataset and research context, we confirm and extend existing theories of distributed creative teams in CSCW. We also argue that studying these small-scale, self-selected, and interest-based teams can inform the design of collaborative systems to support various creative teams’ social needs.

[1]  M. Bligh,et al.  Collaborating with ‘virtual strangers’: Towards developing a framework for leadership in distributed teams , 2011 .

[2]  Christian McCrea.  Snapshot 4: Australian video games: The collapse and reconstruction of an industry , 2013 .

[3]  Emma Westecott,et al.  Independent Game Development as Craft , 2012 .

[4]  J. L. Dyer,et al.  Team research and team training: A state-of-the-art review , 1984 .

[5]  Nianhua Yang,et al.  A Similarity based Trust and Reputation Management Framework for VANETs , 2013 .

[6]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Leadership in online creative collaboration , 2008, CSCW.

[7]  Sean C. Duncan.  Minecraft, beyond construction and survival , 2011 .

[8]  D. B. Short.  Teaching Scientific Concepts Using a Virtual World--Minecraft , 2012 .

[9]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[10]  Rolf T. Wigand,et al.  ICT Enabled Virtual Collaboration through Trust , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  Stina Matthiesen,et al.  Does Distance Still Matter? Revisiting the CSCW Fundamentals on Distributed Collaboration , 2014, TCHI.

[12]  Shumin Zhai.  Editorial: TOCHI turns twenty , 2014, TCHI.

[13]  David F. Redmiles,et al.  Bridging the gap between awareness and trust in globally distributed software teams , 2018, J. Syst. Softw..

[14]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Beyond Being Social: Prospects for Transformative Social Computing , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  J. Nemiro.  The Creative Process in Virtual Teams , 2002 .

[16]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Leadership for Teamwork, Teamwork for Leadership , 2015 .

[17]  Cecilia R. Aragon,et al.  A tale of two online communities: fostering collaboration and creativity in scientists and children , 2009, C&C '09.

[18]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[19]  Oded Nov,et al.  Dusting for science: motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers , 2011, iConference.

[20]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[21]  Mattias Bergström,et al.  Examining Creative Collaboration in Distributed and Co-Located Design Teams , 2007 .

[22]  Yi Wang,et al.  Globally distributed system developers: their trust expectations and processes , 2013, CSCW.

[23]  J. Kratzer,et al.  Keeping Virtual R&D Teams Creative , 2005 .

[24]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Importance of Awareness for Team Cognition in Distributed Collaboration , 2001 .

[25]  David F. Redmiles,et al.  Cheap talk, cooperation, and trust in global software engineering , 2016, Empirical Software Engineering.

[26]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Group creativity : An introduction , 2003 .

[28]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Interactive Team Cognition , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Bart Simon,et al.  Megabooth: The cultural intermediation of indie games , 2017, New Media Soc..

[31]  Donghee Yvette Wohn,et al.  Social Support in eSports: Building Emotional and Esteem Support from Instrumental Support Interactions in a Highly Competitive Environment , 2017, ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play.

[32]  Alison Williams,et al.  Collaborative creativity: a complex systems model with distributed affect , 2011, CHI.

[33]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Distances and diversity: sources for social creativity , 2005, C&C '05.

[34]  L. Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams Research , 2015 .

[35]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception , 2002, CSCW '02.

[36]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Supporting creativity with awareness in distributed collaboration , 2007, GROUP.

[37]  Nadav D. Lipkin.  Examining Indie's Independence: The Meaning of "Indie" Games, the Politics of Production, and Mainstream Cooptation , 2012 .