Physical fitness and work performance standards: A proposed approach

Abstract Traditionally physical performance standards have been developed by a process of normative referencing and are generally established on the bases of age and gender. Many of the jobs assigned to workers can be very physically demanding and result in injury. In addition, men and women may lack physical capacity to fulfil the requirements of such jobs. To satisfy Canadian Human Rights legislation requirements of equal opportunity, regardless of age and gender, the establishment of task-related physical performance standards is an appropriate and desirable approach. These standards must be based on the physical requirements of the jobs and should be within the physiological capacities of the workers. In this paper, the authors have proposed a model to develop task-related performance standards. The purposes, physical capacities, and steps for development of such standards are explained. Applicability of related tests and models also have been outlined. Such an approach should result in a drop of work-related injuries, reduce work for the Workers Compensation Boards and provide greater job satisfaction for the employees. The paper presents a framework for development of specific physical work performance standards for different industries.

[1]  K. Jørgensen,et al.  Physiological problems in repetitive lifting with special reference to tolerance limits to the maximum lifting frequency. , 1974, Ergonomics.

[2]  James E. Wright,et al.  Performance on Selected Candidate Screening Test Procedures Before and After Army Basic and Advanced Individual Training , 1985 .

[3]  R. Cailliet,et al.  Low Back Pain Syndrome , 1963 .

[4]  D. Chaffin Human strength capability and low-back pain. , 1974, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[5]  S. L. French,et al.  Development of Minimum Physical Fitness Standards for the Canadian Armed Forces. Phase 2 , 1987 .

[6]  John F. Patton,et al.  Development of New Gender-Free Physical Fitness Standards for the Army, , 1980 .

[7]  John F. Patton,et al.  Screening for Physical Capacity in the US Army: An Analysis of Measures Predictive of Strength and Stamina, , 1980 .

[8]  N. O. Mulholland,et al.  LIFTAN: an experimental expert system for analysis of manual lifting tasks. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[9]  J. Arnold,et al.  Validation and utility of a strength test for selecting steelworkers. , 1982 .

[10]  S Kumar,et al.  The physiological cost of three different methods of lifting in sagittal and lateral planes. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[11]  J. Vogel,et al.  Endurance capacity for prolonged exercise on the bicycle ergometer. , 1973, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  M M Ayoub,et al.  Establishing a physical criterion for assigning personnel to U.S. Air Force jobs. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[13]  Stull Ga,et al.  Patterns of recovery following isometric and isotonic strength decrement , 1971 .

[14]  B. Schell,et al.  Beyond the job description: managing for performance. , 1987, American Journal of Occupational Therapy.

[15]  G. Andersson,et al.  Low back pain: risk evaluation and preplacement screening. , 1988, Occupational medicine.

[16]  S J Legg,et al.  Effects of psychophysical lifting training on maximal repetitive lifting capacity. , 1988, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[17]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[18]  H Monod,et al.  Contractility of muscle during prolonged static and repetitive dynamic activity. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[19]  Rodgers Sh Job evaluation in worker fitness determination. , 1988 .