Evaluating the effectiveness of AAC programs for persons with severe handicaps

A technological base now exists from which a variety of devices and techniques can be applied to the special augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) needs of individuals with severe handicaps. Accompanying this growing inventory of resources, however, are continued accounts of these individuals' inabilities to use their newly acquired communication systems outside of contrived environments, such as the clinical setting. This position paper begins with a review of attempts to promote functional uses of AAC systems by persons with severe handicaps. The author then calls for a more rigorous validation of the usefulness of these systems for such individuals and their conversational partners. Practitioners are urged to adopt more functional orientations when selecting the content and evaluating the effectiveness of AAC programs.

[1]  D. Baer,et al.  Teachers' generalized use of delay as a stimulus control procedure to increase language use in handicapped children. , 1981, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[2]  Stephen N. Calculator,et al.  Training functional communication board use: a pragmatic approach , 1985 .

[3]  J. Reichle,et al.  Communication Board Use in Severely Handicapped Learners , 1985 .

[4]  S. Calculator,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of a communication board training program. , 1983, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[5]  M. Falvey Community-Based Curriculum: Instructional Strategies for Students With Severe Handicaps , 1986 .

[6]  Deberah Harris,et al.  Communicative interaction processes involving nonvocal physically handicapped children , 1982 .

[7]  P. Parnes,et al.  Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I—discourse patterns , 1985 .

[8]  J. Reichle,et al.  The Selection of an Augmentative System in Communication Intervention: A Critique of Decision Rules , 1985 .

[9]  J. Halle Teaching Functional Language to the Handicapped: An Integrative Model of Natural Environment Teaching Techniques , 1982 .

[10]  C. Dollaghan,et al.  The use of communication boards in a residential setting: an evaluation. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[11]  D. Guess,et al.  Opportunities to Express Preferences and Make Choices among Students with Severe Disabilities in Classroom Settings , 1987 .