Does generation form influence environmental efficiency performance? An analysis of China’s power system

To achieve sustainable development, the focus on power system efficiency should move from analysis of just economic benefits to environmental efficiency studies that assess both economic benefits and carbon emissions. Therefore, balancing the development of different generation forms is a critical field in improving environmental efficiency. Here we classify the 30 provincial administrative regions (PARs) in China into three categories according to the proportion of thermal power ratio. We then use a two-stage environmental network DEA model to compare their efficiency performance. Analysis of the evaluation results leads to the following conclusions. Generation forms have a significant influence on the environmental efficiency performance of power systems, but the differences vary greatly according to the power supply and demand situation. The policy to incentivize clean energy development has achieved its objective in the generation division and further policy reforms should be extended to the grid division. A more flexible power development plan should be implemented according to regional resources endowment for better planning of power system development on a nationwide basis.

[1]  Herbert F. Lewis,et al.  Two-Stage DEA: An Application to Major League Baseball , 2003 .

[2]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Productivity development of Norwegian electricity distribution utilities , 1998 .

[3]  William L. Weber,et al.  A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs , 2010 .

[4]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .

[5]  Rob Alexander,et al.  Does regulation stimulate productivity? The effect of air quality policies on the efficiency of US power plants , 2009 .

[6]  Pablo Arocena,et al.  Cost and quality gains from diversification and vertical integration in the electricity industry: A DEA approach , 2008 .

[7]  中華人民共和国国家統計局 China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[8]  C. Barros Efficiency analysis of hydroelectric generating plants : A case study for Portugal , 2008 .

[9]  Bai-Chen Xie,et al.  Measures to improve the performance of China's thermal power industry in view of cost efficiency , 2013 .

[10]  P. Chitkara,et al.  A data envelopment analysis approach to evaluation of operational inefficiencies in power generating units: a case study of Indian power plants , 1999 .

[11]  Thomas G. Weyman-Jones,et al.  Productive efficiency in a regulated industry: The area electricity boards of England and Wales , 1991 .

[12]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies , 2010 .

[13]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Does weather explain cost and quality performance? An analysis of UK electricity distribution companies , 2009 .

[14]  Magnus Tambour,et al.  Productivity and customer satisfaction in Swedish pharmacies: A DEA network model , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation , 2011 .

[16]  Raúl Pérez-Reyes,et al.  Measuring efficiency and productivity change (PTF) in the Peruvian electricity distribution companies after reforms , 2009 .

[17]  R. Färe,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY AND INTERMEDIATE PRODUCTS: A FRONTIER APPROACH , 1995 .

[18]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Electricity Distribution in the UK and Japan: A Comparative Efficiency Analysis 1985-1998 , 2005 .

[19]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Evaluation of potential reductions in carbon emissions in Chinese provinces based on environmental DEA , 2011 .

[20]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective , 2010 .

[21]  M. Goto,et al.  Measurement of Dynamic Efficiency in Production: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Japanese Electric Utilities , 2003 .

[22]  Rolf Färe,et al.  The relative efficiency of Illinois electric utilities , 1983 .

[23]  Guanghui Zhou,et al.  Determinants and implications of employee electricity saving habit: An empirical study in China , 2013 .

[24]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[25]  J. Yunos,et al.  The efficiency of the National Electricity Board in Malaysia: an intercountry comparison using DEA , 1997 .

[26]  Catherine Waddams Price,et al.  Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: A non-parametric model of the Turkish experience , 1996 .

[27]  T. Sueyoshi,et al.  Operational synergy in the US electric utility industry under an influence of deregulation policy: A linkage to financial performance and corporate value , 2011 .

[28]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies , 2008 .

[29]  Paul A. Steenhof,et al.  Decomposition for emission baseline setting in China's electricity sector , 2007 .

[30]  Suthathip Yaisawarng,et al.  The Effects of Sulfur Dioxide Controls on Productivity Change in the U.S. Electric Power Industry , 1994 .

[31]  Alexander Vaninsky,et al.  Efficiency of electric power generation in the United States: Analysis and forecast based on data envelopment analysis , 2006 .

[32]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment scenario analysis for setting targets to electricity generating plants , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  P. A. Østergaard,et al.  Electricity market auction settings in a future Danish electricity system with a high penetration of , 2011 .

[34]  Adnan Sözen,et al.  Assessment of operational and environmental performance of the thermal power plants in Turkey by using data envelopment analysis , 2010 .

[35]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Ying Fan,et al.  Optimization of China's generating portfolio and policy implications based on portfolio theory , 2010 .

[37]  M. Tsutsui,et al.  A multi-division efficiency evaluation of U.S. electric power companies using a weighted slacks-based measure , 2009 .