Ku-band radar penetration into snow cover on Arctic sea ice using airborne data

Abstract Satellite radar altimetry provides data to monitor winter Arctic sea-ice thickness variability on interannual, basin-wide scales. When using this technique an assumption is made that the peak of the radar return originates from the snow/ice interface. This has been shown to be true in the laboratory for cold, dry snow as is the case on Arctic sea ice during winter. However, this assumption has not been tested in the field. We use data from an airborne normal-incidence Ku-band radar altimeter and in situ field measurements, collected during the CryoSat Validation Experiment (CryoVEx) Bay of Bothnia, 2006 and 2008 field campaigns, to determine the dominant scattering surface for Arctic snow-covered sea ice. In 2006, when the snow temperatures were close to freezing, the dominant scattering surface in 25% of the radar returns appeared closer to the snow/ice interface than the air/snow interface. However, in 2008, when temperatures were lower, the dominant scattering surface appeared closer to the snow/ice interface than the air/snow interface in 80% of the returns.

[1]  Anthony P. Worby,et al.  Field Investigations of Ku-Band Radar Penetration Into Snow Cover on Antarctic Sea Ice , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  T. Stein.  International Geoscience And Remote Sensing Symposium , 1992, [Proceedings] IGARSS '92 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[3]  L. Phalippou,et al.  CryoSat: A mission to determine the fluctuations in Earth’s land and marine ice fields ☆ , 2006 .

[4]  Werner Wiesbeck,et al.  Concept and realization of an Airborne SAR/Interferometric Radar Altimeter System (ASIRAS) , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[5]  Seymour W. Laxon,et al.  Circumpolar thinning of Arctic sea ice following the 2007 record ice extent minimum , 2008 .

[6]  P. Guest,et al.  Measurements near the Atmospheric Surface Flux Group tower at SHEBA: Near‐surface conditions and surface energy budget , 2002 .

[7]  L. N. Connor,et al.  Comparison of Envisat radar and airborne laser altimeter measurements over Arctic sea ice , 2009 .

[8]  A. Gray.  Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Ice , 1981 .

[9]  Frank D. Carsey,et al.  Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Ice , 1992 .

[10]  Ron Kwok,et al.  ICESat observations of Arctic sea ice: A first look , 2004 .

[11]  Neil Peacock,et al.  High interannual variability of sea ice thickness in the Arctic region , 2003, Nature.

[12]  C. Garrity.  Characterization of Snow on Floating Ice and Case Studies of Brightness Temperature Changes During the Onset of Melt , 2013 .

[13]  J. Yackel,et al.  Changing sea ice melt parameters in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: Implications for the future presence of multiyear ice , 2008 .

[14]  Malcolm Davidson,et al.  Development of ASIRAS (Airborne SAR/Interferometric Altimeter System) , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[15]  Douglas M. Smith,et al.  Observation of perennial Arctic sea ice melt and freeze-up using passive microwave data , 1998 .

[16]  Duncan J. Wingham,et al.  Combined airborne laser and radar altimeter measurements over the Fram Strait in May 2002 , 2007 .

[17]  Saibun Tjuatja,et al.  Laboratory measurements of radar backscatter from bare and snow-covered saline ice sheets , 1995 .

[18]  J. Stroeve,et al.  Recent changes in Arctic sea ice melt onset, freezeup, and melt season length , 2009 .

[19]  Stephen E. L. Howell,et al.  On the utility of SeaWinds/QuikSCAT data for the estimation of the thermodynamic state of first-year sea ice , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.