Verification and validation of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence models for external flow

Abstract The Spalart–Allmaras (S-A) turbulence model in the NASA-Langley CFL3D and FUN3D flow solvers has been previously verified 2nd-order accurate. For low subsonic 2-D applications (turbulent flat plate and NACA 0012 airfoil at α = 0 ° ), solutions from the S-A, S-A with Rotation and Curvature (SARC), Menter Shear-Stress Transport (SST), and Wilcox 1998 k - ω turbulence models in commercial flow solvers, Cobalt and RavenCFD, are compared with NASA results for code verification. Of 36 case evaluations, each of which uses 5 systematically refined computational meshes, only 7 approach 2nd-order observed accuracy, but 27 cases show 1st-order or better, indicating the formal order may be less than 2 for these applications. Since Cobalt and RavenCFD turbulence models perform comparable to NASAʼs verified models and since rigorous code verification is not possible without access to source code, the presented evidence suggests these turbulence models are implemented correctly for these or similar flow conditions and configurations. For solution verification, estimates of numerical uncertainty are less than 0.5% for 94% of the cases and less than 0.1% for 61% of the cases. For validation, the turbulent flat plate solutions match experiment skin friction within 4.8% for x / L > 0.05 , and for airfoil drag coefficient, S-A and SST agree within 1.2% of experiment, SARC 2%, and k - ω 4%.

[1]  E. Toro,et al.  Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver , 1994 .

[2]  P. Spalart,et al.  Turbulence Model Behavior in Low Reynolds Number Regions of Aerodynamic Flowfields , 2008 .

[3]  P. Spalart,et al.  On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature , 1997 .

[4]  E. D. V. Bigarella,et al.  Advanced Eddy-Viscosity and Reynolds-Stress Turbulence Model Simulations of Aerospace Applications , 2006 .

[5]  Clinton P. T. Groth,et al.  Assessment of Riemann solvers for unsteady one-dimensional inviscid flows for perfect gases , 1988 .

[6]  Scott A. Morton,et al.  AlAA 2004-0395 Accurate Drag Prediction Using Cobalt , 2004 .

[7]  P. Spalart,et al.  Turbulence Modeling in Rotating and Curved Channels: Assessing the Spalart-Shur Correction , 2000 .

[8]  William Z. Strang,et al.  Validation of several Reynolds-averaged turbulence models in a 3-D unstructured grid code , 2000 .

[9]  Scott A. Morton,et al.  Accurate Drag Prediction Using Cobalt , 2006 .

[10]  J. Schetz Boundary Layer Analysis , 1992 .

[11]  Ching-Hua Wang,et al.  Implicit Weighted Essentially Nonoscillatory Schemes with Antidiffusive Flux for Compressible Viscous Flows , 2009 .

[12]  K Wieghardt,et al.  On the turbulent friction layer for rising pressure , 1951 .

[13]  Yuan Guo-xing,et al.  Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing Code , 2010 .

[14]  C. L. Rumsey,et al.  Application of FUN3D and CFL3D to the Third Workshop on CFD Uncertainty Analysis , 2013 .

[15]  C. L. Ladson,et al.  Effects of independent variation of Mach and Reynolds numbers on the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 0012 airfoil section , 1988 .

[16]  Response of Simple Turbulence Models to Step Changes of Slip Velocity , 2001 .

[17]  Ernst Heinrich Hirschel,et al.  Comparison of Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models in Flows with Adverse Pressure Gradient , 2006 .

[18]  James R. Forsythe,et al.  Prediction of the Flow over an Airfoil at Maximum Lift , 2004 .

[19]  W. Oberkampf,et al.  Validation Case Study: Prediction of Compressible Turbulent Mixing Layer Growth Rate , 2006 .

[20]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing , 2011 .

[21]  Eiji Shima,et al.  Simple and Parameter-Free Second Slope Limiter for Unstructured Grid Aerodynamic Simulations , 2012 .

[22]  Andrey Garbaruk,et al.  Numerical Study of Wind-Tunnel Walls Effects on Transonic Airfoil Flow , 2003 .

[23]  Robert Tomaro,et al.  Cobalt: a parallel, implicit, unstructured Euler/Navier-Stokes solver , 1998 .

[24]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  Computational Investigation into the Use of Response Functions for Aerodynamic-Load Modeling , 2012 .

[25]  Farrukh S. Alvi,et al.  Experimental and Computational Investigation of Supersonic Impinging Jets , 2002 .