Computer simulation of control strategies for optimal anaerobic digestion.

Three previously published control strategies for anaerobic digestion were implemented in Simulink/Matlab using Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) to model the biological process. The controllers' performance were then simulated and evaluated based on their responses from five different types of process scenarios i.e. start-up and steady state performance as well as disturbances from concentration, pH and ammonia in the inflow. Of the three evaluated control strategies, the extremum-seeking variable gain controller gave the best overall performance. However, a proportional feedback controller based on the pH-level, used as a reference case in the evaluation, proved to give as good results as the extremum-seeking variable gain controller but with a lower wear on the pump. It was therefore concluded that a fast proportional control of the reactor pH is a key element for optimally controlling a low-buffering anaerobic digestion process.

[1]  J. Steyer,et al.  State indicators for monitoring the anaerobic digestion process. , 2010, Water research.

[2]  G. Olsson,et al.  Extremum-seeking with variable gain control for intensifying biogas production in anaerobic fermentation. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  J Keller,et al.  A review of ADM1 extensions, applications, and analysis: 2002-2005. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  S Winkler,et al.  Progress in sensor technology--progress in process control? Part 1: sensor property investigation and classification. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  Per Hagander,et al.  Bioreactor control using a probing feeding strategy and mid-ranging control , 2007 .

[7]  J P Steyer,et al.  Use of modelling to evaluate best control practice for winery-type wastewaters. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  B. Mattiasson,et al.  Evaluation of parameters for monitoring an anaerobic co-digestion process , 2000, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[9]  F Molina,et al.  A hydrogen-based variable-gain controller for anaerobic digestion processes. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  B. Ahring,et al.  Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic digestors , 1995, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[11]  Haidong Zhou,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of different organic wastes for biogas production and its operational control performed by the modified ADM1 , 2012, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[12]  Jean-Philippe Steyer,et al.  Advanced control of anaerobic digestion processes through disturbances monitoring , 1999 .

[13]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Aspects on ADM1 Implementation within the BSM2 Framework , 2005 .

[14]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Monitoring and control of anaerobic reactors. , 2003, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[15]  J. B. Copp,et al.  Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[16]  E Roca,et al.  An integrated system to remote monitor and control anaerobic wastewater treatment plants through the internet. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.