Strangers meet: Laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters

When strangers of the opposite-sex meet for the first time, both sexes are in a difficult situation. In this high risk situation, neither person knows the intention of the other, and consequently non-verbal signalling becomes the major channel for communication. Because of their higher biological risk, females should prefer less obvious tactics in order to communicate interest in a potential partner than males. The tactical task of signalling clearly, but at the same time subtly, is solved by the use of multifunctional or metacommunicative signals. In this study we propose that there is not one single meaning for any given signal. In laughing loudly we find a signal which consists of acoustical, mimical and postural information. In this way either laughter can send a “this is play” message or its meaning can be modified by other signals. Thus laughter, together with its accompanying body postures and movements, conveys messages that range from sexual solicitation to aversion, depending on which and how many different signals are present. Males seem to communicate interest for the female during laughter with only a few signals, such as body orientation and dominance signals. In contrast, females communicate interest via numerous signals which function as signals of bodily self-presentation and submission. In both sexes, a lack of interest is communicated through closed postures.

[1]  C. Darwin The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals , .

[2]  N. Bolwig Facial Expression in Primates With Remarks On a Parallel Development in Certain Carnivores (a Preliminary Report On Work in Progress) , 1964 .

[3]  A. Scheflen,et al.  QUASI-COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR IN PSYCHOTHERAPY. , 1965, Psychiatry.

[4]  A vocabulary of sexual enticement and proposition , 1972 .

[5]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[6]  V. Hooff A comparative approach to the phylogeny of laughter and smiling. , 1972 .

[7]  Erving Goffman,et al.  The arrangement between the sexes , 1977 .

[8]  Donald W. Fiske,et al.  Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory , 1977 .

[9]  D B Givens,et al.  The nonverbal basis of attraction: flirtation, courtship, and seduction. , 1978, Psychiatry.

[10]  D. Symons Evolution of human sexuality , 1979 .

[11]  Douglas R. Hofstadter,et al.  Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1981 .

[12]  Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid by Douglas R. Hofstadter (review) , 2017 .

[13]  Mate choice in humans as an interpersonal process , 1981 .

[14]  M. Andersson,et al.  Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement , 1982 .

[15]  Monica M. Moore,et al.  Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: Context and consequences , 1985 .

[16]  Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt,et al.  Zur Biologie des menschlichen Verhaltens , 1986 .

[17]  D. Buss The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  E. Kośmicki Irenaus Eibl-Eibesfeldt, “Die Biologie des menschlichen Verhaltens”. Grundriss der Humanethologie, Munchen – Zurich 1984, Piper, ss. 998. , 1988, Anthropological Review.

[19]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.