Initial feasibility evaluation of the RISES system: An innovative and activity-based closed-loop framework for spinal cord injury rehabilitation and recovery

Background Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord may improve rewiring of the affected pathways. Immediate modulation of stimulation parameters, and its effects of it on kinematics and electromyographic variables is unclear. Methods This study piloted the safety and feasibility of the Reynolds Innovative Spinal Electrical Stimulation (RISES) technology with a focus on its novel closed-loop setting. This personalized, task-specific non-invasive stimulation system enables real-time stimulation parameter modulation and supports multi-data acquisition and storage. Four SCI participants underwent a clinical trial coupled with activity-based training. Primary safety outcome measures included adverse events (AEs) and skin integrity; secondary measures were vital signs, pain, and fatigue assessed at the pre, mid, and post-stimulation sessions. The trial included open-loop and closed-loop blocks of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS). Results Results showed no serious adverse events, with skin integrity unaffected. Vital signs and pain showed no significant differences across session timepoints. Fatigue levels differed significantly with post-session > mid-session > pre-session. Comparisons between open-loop and closed-loop blocks showed no significant differences in setup time, vital signs, pain, or fatigue. Average stimulation duration per task was significantly longer for open-loop (467.6 sec) than Closed-loop (410.8 sec). Conclusions RISES, demonstrated safety and feasibility. Further work will focus on clinical efficacy.

[1]  Sarah Massey,et al.  The effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation delivered with and without high-frequency modulation on spinal and corticospinal excitability. , 2023, Artificial organs.

[2]  S. Harkema,et al.  Artifact Adaptive Ideal Filtering of EMG Signals Contaminated by Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation , 2023, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  S. Harkema,et al.  Targeted transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation promotes persistent recovery of upper limb strength and tactile sensation in spinal cord injury: a pilot study , 2023, Frontiers in neuroscience.

[4]  S. Harkema,et al.  Multi-Site Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation Facilitates Upper Limb Sensory and Motor Recovery in Severe Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Study , 2023, Journal of clinical medicine.

[5]  H. Hoenig,et al.  Optimization of Transspinal Stimulation Applications for Motor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury: Scoping Review , 2023, Journal of clinical medicine.

[6]  A. Dalrymple,et al.  Using a high-frequency carrier does not improve comfort of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation , 2022, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The Immediate and Short-Term Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability , 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[8]  G. Forrest,et al.  Cervical Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation Improves Upper Extremity and Hand Function in People With Complete Tetraplegia: A Case Study , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  L. Duffell,et al.  The Effects of Adding Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS) to Sit-To-Stand Training in People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[10]  Gerome A. Manson,et al.  The relationship between maximum tolerance and motor activation during transcutaneous spinal stimulation is unaffected by the carrier frequency or vibration , 2020, Physiological reports.

[11]  Julian Taylor,et al.  Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Motor Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review , 2019, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  Ramzi Halabi,et al.  Novel Approach for Wireless EMG Database Collection: Applied to Muscle Building Workout Routine Optimization , 2019, 2019 Fifth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME).

[13]  E. Bravo-Esteban,et al.  Soleus H-reflex modulation following transcutaneous high- and low-frequency spinal stimulation in healthy volunteers. , 2019, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[14]  Fabien B. Wagner,et al.  Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury , 2018, Nature.

[15]  Daniel C. Lu,et al.  Engaging cervical spinal circuitry with non-invasive spinal stimulation and buspirone to restore hand function in chronic motor complete patients , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Igor A. Lavrov,et al.  Neuromodulation of lumbosacral spinal networks enables independent stepping after complete paraplegia , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[17]  Hui Zhong,et al.  Non-Invasive Activation of Cervical Spinal Networks after Severe Paralysis. , 2018, Journal of neurotrauma.

[18]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Stimulation Promotes Long-Term Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Chronic Tetraplegia , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Karen J. Nolan,et al.  Alterations in Spectral Attributes of Surface Electromyograms after Utilization of a Foot Drop Stimulator during Post-Stroke Gait , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[20]  S. Harkema,et al.  Activity-Based Therapy: From Basic Science to Clinical Application for Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury. , 2017, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[21]  Jeffrey A. Strommen,et al.  Enabling Task‐Specific Volitional Motor Functions via Spinal Cord Neuromodulation in a Human With Paraplegia , 2017, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[22]  K. Minassian,et al.  Targeting Lumbar Spinal Neural Circuitry by Epidural Stimulation to Restore Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury , 2016, Neurotherapeutics.

[23]  Angela Colantonio,et al.  The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Sleep medicine reviews.

[24]  Yoshihiko Fujita,et al.  障害児入所施設における入院リハビリテーションによるThe Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)の変化 , 2015 .

[25]  M. Mulcahey,et al.  Reliability and validity of the capabilities of upper extremity test (CUE-T) in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury , 2015, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[26]  T. Deer,et al.  Advanced waveforms and frequency with spinal cord stimulation: burst and high-frequency energy delivery , 2015, Expert review of medical devices.

[27]  S. Morrison,et al.  Activity-based therapy for recovery of walking in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: results from a randomized clinical trial. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Christie K. Ferreira,et al.  Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study , 2011, The Lancet.

[29]  D. Amtmann,et al.  Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference , 2010, PAIN.

[30]  Alex R Ward,et al.  Electrical Stimulation Using Kilohertz-Frequency Alternating Current , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[31]  D L Wolfe,et al.  Spasticity outcome measures in spinal cord injury: psychometric properties and clinical utility , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[32]  K. Anderson,et al.  Functional Recovery Measures for Spinal Cord Injury: An Evidence-Based Review for Clinical Practice and Research , 2008, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[33]  I Gelernter,et al.  The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: Reliability and validity in a multi-center international study , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[34]  M. Dijkers,et al.  Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: An Evidence-based Review for Clinical Practice and Research* , 2007, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[35]  K. Anderson Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[36]  M. Johns,et al.  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. , 1991, Sleep.

[37]  M. Powers,et al.  Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties , 1985, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[38]  M. S. Read,et al.  International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Revised 2019. , 2021, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[39]  J. Scott Richards,et al.  From the 2006 NIDRR SCI Measures Meeting Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: An Evidence-based Review for Clinical Practice and Research Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures Meeting , 2007 .