The importance of sleepers spacing in railways

Abstract The railway tracks are composed of steel rails that are supported by the infrastructure through sleepers, which are generally assembled with a fixed separation between them. Sleepers and fastenings are the most numerous elements of the superstructure. The global cost of these elements is directly proportional to their number along the track. Therefore, the reduction of the number of these components can generate relevant reductions of track construction costs. Nonetheless, very few studies focused on the optimal sleeper spacing and its consequences. Moreover, the railway industry uses fixed separation values based on past experience, rather than on scientific knowledge. In line with this reasoning, the objective of this work is to analyse the optimal sleeper spacing in order to contribute to the minimization of track costs. The work starts from an overview of the sleepers spacing used over the world and analyses how this can affect the track performance. This study is valuable for design and construction of new tracks, as well as for the maintenance and renewal of existing ones, helping to achieve cost savings for the rail industry, positive environmental results and consequent contributions to the competitiveness of rail transport.

[1]  John W. Weber.  CONCRETE CROSSTIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1969 .

[2]  Joao Pombo,et al.  A new wheel–rail contact model for railway dynamics , 2007 .

[3]  José L. Escalona,et al.  Multibody model of railway vehicles with weakly coupled vertical and lateral dynamics , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[4]  Nicola Bosso,et al.  A Comprehensive Strategy to Estimate Track Condition and its Evolution , 2012 .

[5]  Joao Pombo,et al.  A novel methodology to automatically include general track flexibility in railway vehicle dynamic analyses , 2020 .

[6]  P. F. Teixeira,et al.  High speed and track deterioration: The role of vertical stiffness of the track , 2004 .

[7]  José M. Goicolea,et al.  DYNAMIC EFFECT OF HIGH SPEED RAILWAY TRAFFIC LOADS ON THE BALLAST TRACK SETTLEMENT , 2011 .

[8]  Vassilios A. Profillidis,et al.  Railway management and engineering , 2017 .

[9]  Filipe Marques,et al.  Utilization of Non-Conformal Wheel Surfaces for Railway Dynamics , 2019, Advances in Mechanism and Machine Science.

[10]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Laboratory measurements of dynamic properties of rail pads under incremental preload , 2006 .

[11]  Javad Sadeghi,et al.  INVESTIGATION ON THE ACCURACY OF THE CURRENT PRACTICES IN ANALYSIS OF RAILWAY TRACK CONCRETE SLEEPERS , 2005 .

[12]  R. Smith,et al.  Wheel-Rail Contact Modelling within Switches and Crossings , 2012 .

[13]  Carsten Drebenstedt,et al.  Mine Planning and Equipment Selection , 2014 .

[14]  Takahisa Nakamura,et al.  Effects of Sleeper Shape on Lateral Resistance of Railway Ballasted Tracks , 2014 .

[15]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  A finite element methodology to model flexible tracks with arbitrary geometry for railway dynamics applications , 2021 .

[16]  M. Sol-Sánchez,et al.  The use of elastic elements in railway tracks: A state of the art review , 2015 .

[17]  Isidro Carrascal,et al.  Experimental and finite element fatigue assessment of the spring clip of the SKL-1 railway fastening system , 2019 .

[18]  E. G. Vadillo,et al.  Effect of sleeper distance on rail corrugation , 1998 .

[19]  Seiichi Miura,et al.  EFFECT OF SLEEPER SIZE ON BALLASTED TRACK SETTLEMENT , 2004 .

[20]  Isidro Carrascal,et al.  Fatigue failure micromechanisms in recycled aggregate mortar by μCT analysis , 2020 .

[21]  Satish Chandra,et al.  Railway Engineering , 2008 .

[22]  N F Doyle,et al.  RAILWAY TRACK DESIGN: A REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE , 1980 .

[23]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  A co-simulation approach to the wheel–rail contact with flexible railway track , 2018, Multibody System Dynamics.

[24]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  An alternative method to include track irregularities in railway vehicle dynamic analyses , 2012 .

[25]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Application of a wheel–rail contact model to railway dynamics in small radius curved tracks , 2008 .

[26]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Implementation of a non-Hertzian contact model for railway dynamic application , 2019, Multibody System Dynamics.

[27]  P. Hölscher,et al.  Numerical modelling of railway bridge approaches: Influence of soil non-linearity , 2014 .

[28]  David Connolly,et al.  Railway critical velocity – Analytical prediction and analysis , 2016 .

[29]  Matin Shahzamanian Sichani.  Wheel-rail contact modelling in vehicle dynamics simulation , 2013 .

[30]  L. Walton.  THE ABC'S OF EDI: THE ROLE OF ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING (ABC) IN DETERMINING EDI FEASIBILITY IN LOGISTICS ORGANIZATIONS , 1996 .

[31]  Miguel Cuartas,et al.  Prediction of mechanical properties of rail pads under in-service conditions through machine learning algorithms , 2021, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[32]  Joao Pombo,et al.  Dynamic calibration of slab track models for railway applications using full-scale testing , 2020, Computers & Structures.

[33]  Rui Calçada,et al.  A practical three-dimensional wheel-rail interaction element for dynamic response analysis of vehicle-track systems , 2021 .

[34]  Isidro Carrascal,et al.  Self-compacting recycled aggregate concrete using out-of-service railway superstructure wastes , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[35]  Luigi dell’Olio,et al.  Analysis of the influence of support positions in transition zones. A numerical analysis , 2017 .

[36]  Dingqing Li,et al.  Transition of Railroad Bridge Approaches , 2005 .

[37]  Simon Iwnicki,et al.  Damage to Railway Wheels and Rails: A Review of the Causes, Prediction Methods, Reduction and Allocation of Costs , 2012 .

[38]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Modernisation of rail tracks for higher speeds and greater freight , 2013 .

[39]  Joao Pombo,et al.  Influence of the operational conditions on static and dynamic stiffness of rail pads , 2020 .

[40]  Joao Pombo,et al.  Impact of maintenance conditions of vehicle components on the vehicle–track interaction loads , 2018 .

[41]  Nazmul Hasan.  Railroad Tie Spacing Related to Wheel-Load Distribution and Ballast Pressure , 2015 .

[42]  Christos Pyrgidis,et al.  Railway Transportation Systems: Design, Construction and Operation , 2016 .

[43]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  On the generation of an enhanced lookup table for wheel-rail contact models , 2018 .

[44]  Luigi dell’Olio,et al.  Track transitions in railways: A review , 2016 .

[45]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Finite Element Methodology for Flexible Track Models in Railway Dynamics Applications , 2013 .

[46]  Joao Pombo,et al.  Impact of rail infrastructure maintenance conditions on the vehicle-track interaction loads , 2020 .

[47]  Sin Sin Hsu,et al.  Improving Switches and Crossings Performance and Reliability , 2021 .

[49]  P. Hölscher.  The Dynamics of Foundations for High Speed Lines on Soft Soils , 2012 .

[50]  Joao Pombo,et al.  Study on different solutions to reduce the dynamic impacts in transition zones for high-speed rail , 2017 .

[51]  Joao Pombo,et al.  Application of a Computational Tool to Study the Influence of Worn Wheels on Railway Vehicle Dynamics , 2012 .

[52]  Justin Kennedy,et al.  Behaviour of train–track interaction in stiffness transitions , 2012 .

[53]  David Connolly,et al.  Application of coupled train-track modelling of critical speeds for high-speed trains using three-dimensional non-linear finite elements , 2015 .

[54]  Tore Dahlberg.  On the Use of Under-Sleeper Pads in Tracks with Varying Track Stiffness , 2009 .

[55]  Kazuhisa Abe,et al.  Sleeper Spacing Optimization for Vibration Reduction in Rails , 2012 .

[56]  Filipe Marques,et al.  A three-dimensional approach for contact detection between realistic wheel and rail surfaces for improved railway dynamic analysis , 2020, Mechanism and Machine Theory.