Learning to build relationships for a better Australia Indigenous reconciliation in action in the construction and resource sectors

Purpose Research examining the role of construction and involvement of resource organisations with indigenous reconciliation has been very limited in Australia. This paper aims to examine how a sample of organisations from Western Australia (WA) are engaging with indigenous reconciliation. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire survey juxtaposed with in-depth interviews are used to explore how construction and resource companies (mining and energy) operating in WA have been planning to build better relationships with the indigenous community as part of their corporate social responsibility (CSR) programme. Findings The majority of construction and resource companies sampled embraced reconciliation as part of a contractual and legal requirement rather than part of their CSR. It was acknowledged that to effectively address the issues associated with reconciliation and indigenous engagement, there is a requirement for flexibility and adaption of existing protocols and processes to better suit the cultural differences that arise with interactions between indigenous and non-indigenous peoples. Research limitations/implications The questionnaire survey was cross-sectional, and a limited number of in-depth interviews were undertaken. Respondents’ opinions were sought about their organisations’ reconciliation action plans, which have only been recently embraced by firms, and thus, views that were solicited should not be treated as being definitive. Originality/value Research examining the role of construction and involvement of resource organisations with indigenous reconciliation in the construction and resource sector has been limited. The findings of this study can provide a platform for examining and comparing how construction and resource organisations in different countries are embracing the process of reconciliation with their indigenous peoples.

[1]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[2]  Louis M. Smith,et al.  Qualitative Research and Evaluation: Triangulation and Multimethods Reconsidered. , 1986 .

[3]  Judith .QBell Judith Bell,et al.  Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-time Researchers , 1993 .

[4]  J M Morse,et al.  Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. , 1991, Nursing research.

[5]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[6]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Survey Sampling Principles , 1993 .

[7]  J. E. Ward,et al.  Aboriginal health: why is reconciliation necessary? , 1999, The Medical journal of Australia.

[8]  J. Creswell,et al.  Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry , 2000 .

[9]  Peter Frankental.  Corporate social responsibility – a PR invention? , 2001 .

[10]  Alan Brown,et al.  A Corporate Social Responsibility Audit within a Quality Management Framework , 2001 .

[11]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Triangulation in construction management research , 2002 .

[12]  Christina Foss,et al.  The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[13]  Diane M. Martin,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World's Most Successful Firms , 2003 .

[14]  M. Porter,et al.  Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[15]  M. Aitken,et al.  Business and human rights: A critical assessment of the notion of CSR and measurement , 2007 .

[16]  Graeme Auld,et al.  The New Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[17]  S. Petrovic-Lazarevic.  The development of corporate social responsibility in the Australian construction industry , 2008 .

[18]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Introduction: corporate social responsibility in the construction industry , 2008 .

[19]  M. King,et al.  Indigenous health part 1: determinants and disease patterns , 2009, The Lancet.

[20]  B. Hunter,et al.  Prospects for 'closing the gap' in socioeconomic outcomes for Indigenous Australians? , 2009 .

[21]  N. Rogers,et al.  Indigenous Australians and living kidney donation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Stephen Barthorpe.  Implementing corporate social responsibility in the UK construction industry , 2010 .

[23]  Wayne Fallon,et al.  Giving with one hand : on the mining sector’s treatment of indigenous stakeholders in the name of CSR , 2010 .

[24]  Sonja Yrjo Olavi Petrovic-Lazarevic,et al.  Good corporate citizenship in the Australian construction industry , 2010 .

[25]  David J. Edwards,et al.  The case for “3D triangulation” when applied to construction management research , 2010 .

[26]  C. Ho,et al.  Ethics management for the construction industry: A review of ethical decision‐making literature , 2011 .

[27]  Richard Fellows,et al.  The role of corporate citizenship values in promoting corporate social performance: towards a conceptual model and a research agenda , 2011 .

[28]  Louise Randles,et al.  A business case for developing a corporate social responsibility policy , 2013 .

[29]  K. Moodley,et al.  Community interaction in the construction industry , 2013 .

[30]  I. Demirag.  Corporate Social Responsibility, Accountability and Governance , 2018 .