Theorizing in Design Science Research: Inductive versus Deductive Approaches

This paper explores which theorizing strategies can be employed in DSR to make a theoretical contribution by examining two illustrative case examples. First, we find that abduction, deduction, and induction all play a role in DSR. Second, we suggest that design theorists can choose among a range of theorizing strategies (i.e., inductive theorizing, deductive theorizing, and hybrid approaches) that differ in their degree to which they make use of abduction, deduction, and induction as well as their iterative sequencing over time in repeated theorizing cycles. Third, we reveal from the discussion of two prominent IS design theories that empirical and conceptual methods for theorizing play an important role in both the build and evaluate phases of the DSR cycle. Finally, we recommend theorists in future DSR projects that pursue the goal to develop design theory to think explicitly about their theorizing approach and select and use research methods accordingly.

[1]  Saku Mantere,et al.  Two Strategies for Inductive Reasoning in Organizational Research , 2010 .

[2]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project , 2008 .

[3]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[4]  P. Järvinen.  Action Research is Similar to Design Science , 2007 .

[5]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[6]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[7]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[8]  J. Reichertz,et al.  Abduction: The Logic of Discovery of Grounded Theory , 2009 .

[9]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[10]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[13]  Norwood Russell Hanson,et al.  The Logic of Discovery , 1958 .

[14]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[15]  William R. King,et al.  Integrating strategic issues into strategic management , 1984 .

[16]  James D. Thompson.  On Building an Administrative Science , 1956 .

[17]  Thierry C. Pauchant,et al.  Triggers, templates and twitches in the tracking of emerging strategic issues , 1988 .

[18]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[20]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Knowledge for Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[21]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Rigor and Relevance in IS Research: Redefining the Debate and a Call for Future Research 1 , 2011 .

[22]  J. Webster,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES. PATTERNS OF INTEREST AROUND ISSUES: THE ROLE OF UNCERTAINTY AND FEASIBILITY. , 1988 .

[23]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[24]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Organizing and Failures of Imagination , 2005 .

[25]  A. Clarke.  Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn , 2005 .

[26]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Editor’s comments: rigor and relevance in is research: redefining the debate and a call for future research , 2011 .

[27]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[28]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  2001 Presidential address - Strategic directions for the academy of management: This academy is for you! , 2002 .

[29]  K. Seers.  Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[30]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  B. Glaser.  Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Vs. Forcing , 1992 .

[32]  Karen Locke,et al.  Perspective - Making Doubt Generative: Rethinking the Role of Doubt in the Research Process , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, , . , 2011 .

[34]  Carl H. Smith,et al.  A Logic of Discovery , 1998, Discovery Science.

[35]  Robert Winter,et al.  Design science research in Europe , 2008 .

[36]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  M. Agar.  Speaking of ethnography , 1985 .

[38]  K. Weick.  What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[39]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The BUSINESS SCHOOL A PROBLEM IN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN , 1967 .

[40]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[41]  W. Salmon.  The foundations of scientific inference , 1967 .

[42]  Les Gasser,et al.  TOP-MODELER©: Supporting Complex Strategic and Operational Decisionmaking , 2000, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[43]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[44]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[45]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory : strategies for qualitativeresearch [Glaser, 1968] , 1968 .

[46]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Explanatory Design Theory , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[47]  J. Gilgun,et al.  The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. , 2009 .

[48]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Decision support systems : an organizational perspective , 1978 .

[49]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[50]  Robert Wayne Gregory,et al.  Design Science Research and the Grounded Theory Method: Characteristics, Differences, and Complementary Uses , 2010, ECIS.

[51]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Engaged Scholarship in IS Research , 2008, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Engaged Design Science: Developing Design Visions for the Future E-Newspaper , 2010, ICIS.

[53]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  DESIGN THEORIES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS - A NEED FOR MULTI-GROUNDING , 2004 .

[54]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Building theory in the sciences of the artificial , 2009, DESRIST.

[55]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[56]  Warren J. Samuels,et al.  Signs, Pragmatism, and Abduction: The Tragedy, Irony, and Promise of Charles Sanders Peirce , 2000 .

[57]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Inductive Top-Down Theorizing: A Source of New Theories of Organization , 2011 .

[58]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[59]  David Hume.  A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[60]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[61]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[62]  John N. Hooker,et al.  Is Design Theory Possible , 2004 .

[63]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice , 1999 .