Automated sorting for size, sex and skeletal anomalies of cultured seabass using external shape analysis

In aquaculture, automation of fish processing by computer vision could reduce operating costs, improving product quality and profit. Currently fish are mechanically sorted by size, but market constraints require that externally malformed fish be removed as well. Additionally fish farmers screen for sex, in order to exploit the higher growth potential of females. The aim of this study was the development of methodological tools applicable to the on-line sorting of farmed seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax, L.) for size, sex and presence of abnormalities. These tools are based on image analysis and utilizing outline morphometry (Elliptic Fourier analysis) combined with multivariate techniques (based on partial least squares modelling). Moreover, the integration of these techniques produce size estimation (in weight) with a better regression efficiency (r = 0.9772) than the commonly used log of the measured body length (r = 0.9443). The two partial least squares discriminant analysis models used to select sex and malformed fish also returned high discrimination efficiencies (82.05% and 88.21%, respectively). The implementation of a similar approach within an on-line sorting machine would allow for real-time live fish processing.

[1]  Michele Scardi,et al.  Skeletal quality assessment of reared and wild sharpsnout sea bream and pandora juveniles , 2003 .

[2]  Maroudio Kentouri,et al.  Environmental determinants of haemal lordosis in European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax (Linnaeus, 1758) , 2006 .

[3]  Paolo Menesatti,et al.  A Novel Morphometry-Based Protocol of Automated Video-Image Analysis for Species Recognition and Activity Rhythms Monitoring in Deep-Sea Fauna , 2009, Sensors.

[4]  Laveen N. Kanal,et al.  Pattern recognition in practice II : proceedings of an international workshop held in Amsterdam, June 19-21, 1985 , 1986 .

[5]  James S. Crampton,et al.  Elliptic Fourier shape analysis of fossil bivalves: some practical considerations , 1995 .

[6]  I. Olesen,et al.  Basic Statistical Parameters , 2005 .

[7]  M. Vandeputte,et al.  Amélioration génétique des poissons : quelles réalisations et quels défis pour demain ? , 2009 .

[8]  Da-Wen Sun,et al.  Shape Analysis of Agricultural Products: A Review of Recent Research Advances and Potential Application to Computer Vision , 2011 .

[9]  S. Gunasekaran.  Nondestructive Food Evaluation: Techniques to Analyze Properties and Quality , 2000 .

[10]  Marc Vandeputte,et al.  What is the heritable component of spinal deformities in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) , 2009 .

[11]  D. Kendall.  MORPHOMETRIC TOOLS FOR LANDMARK DATA: GEOMETRY AND BIOLOGY , 1994 .

[12]  M. Pavlidis,et al.  Sparidae: Biology and aquaculture of gilthead sea bream and other species. , 2011 .

[13]  T. Gjedrem,et al.  Selection and breeding programs in aquaculture , 2005 .

[14]  Federico Pallottino,et al.  Application of non-invasive techniques to differentiate sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax, L. 1758) quality cultured under different conditions , 2011, Aquaculture International.

[15]  Francesca Antonucci,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on shape variation in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) , 2010 .

[16]  L. Lovshin,et al.  Formulated diets, feeding strategies, and cannibalism control during intensive culture of juvenile carnivorous fishes , 1999 .

[17]  Bahar Gümüş,et al.  Prediction of the weight of Alaskan pollock using image analysis. , 2010, Journal of food science.

[18]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Multivariate calibration of hyperspectral γ‐ray energy spectra for proximal soil sensing , 2007 .

[19]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Computer Vision , 1982 .

[20]  J. Blaxter,et al.  4 Development: Eggs and Larvae , 1969 .

[21]  Mario Fernando Montenegro Campos,et al.  Determining the Appropriate Feature Set for Fish Classification Tasks , 2005, XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing (SIBGRAPI'05).

[22]  F. Antonucci,et al.  External shape analyses in Atherina boyeri (Risso, 1810) from different environments , 2012 .

[23]  M. Kentouri,et al.  Development of a saddleback-like syndrome in reared white seabream Diplodus sargus (Linnaeus, 1758) , 2003 .

[24]  M. Dupont-Nivet,et al.  Response to domestication and selection for growth in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in separate and mixed tanks , 2009 .

[25]  Corrado Costa,et al.  Skeletal Deformities and Juvenile Quality , 2011 .

[26]  Murat O. Balaban,et al.  Prediction of the Weight of Aquacultured Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by Image Analysis , 2010 .

[27]  A. Zugarramurdi,et al.  Efficiency of size sorting of fish , 1997 .

[28]  J. Aguilera,et al.  Computer Vision and Stereoscopy for Estimating Firmness in the Salmon (Salmon salar) Fillets , 2010 .

[29]  Svante Wold,et al.  PLS DISCRIMINANT PLOTS , 1986 .

[30]  Alastair R. Allen,et al.  A method for working out the moments of a polygon using an integration technique , 1990, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[31]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A COMPARISON OF FOURIER METHODS FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF WING SHAPE IN MOSQUITOES (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) , 1984 .

[32]  Federico Pallottino,et al.  Shape-based methodology for multivariate discrimination among Italian hazelnut cultivars , 2008 .

[33]  Federico Pallottino,et al.  An Advanced Colour Calibration Method for Fish Freshness Assessment: a Comparison Between Standard and Passive Refrigeration Modalities , 2012, Food and Bioprocess Technology.

[34]  Maroudio Kentouri,et al.  The effect of rearing conditions on development of saddleback syndrome and caudal fin deformities in Dentex dentex (L.) , 2001 .

[35]  Myrtille Vivien,et al.  Two Approaches for Discriminant Partial Least Squares , 2003 .

[36]  L. F. Pau,et al.  Vision Applications in the Fishing and Fish Product Industries , 1988, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[37]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[38]  Clara Boglione,et al.  Normal and abnormal osteological development of caudal fin in Sparus aurata L. fry , 1997 .

[39]  M. Balaban,et al.  Using image analysis to predict the weight of Alaskan salmon of different species. , 2010, Journal of food science.

[40]  E. Branson,et al.  Welfare and Deformities in Fish , 2008 .

[41]  L. A. Stone,et al.  Computer Aided Design of Experiments , 1969 .

[42]  F. Piferrer,et al.  Genetic, endocrine, and environmental components of sex determination and differentiation in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). , 2005, General and comparative endocrinology.

[43]  G. Marino,et al.  Skeletal anomalies in dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe 1834) juveniles reared with different methodologies and larval densities , 2009 .

[44]  P. Haffray,et al.  Sexual growth dimorphism in sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax , 2001 .

[45]  John Reidar Mathiassen,et al.  Trends in application of imaging technologies to inspection of fish and fish products , 2011 .

[46]  Norval J. C. Strachan,et al.  Automated measurement of species and length of fish by computer vision , 2006 .

[47]  Daniel Q. Naiman.  Pattern Recognition in Practice II , 1988 .

[48]  G. Carvalho,et al.  Quality of hatchery-reared juveniles for marine fisheries stock enhancement , 2007 .

[49]  M. Powell,et al.  Effects of lower jaw deformity on swimming performance and recovery from exhaustive exercise in triploid and diploid Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. , 2009 .

[50]  John Reidar Mathiassen,et al.  Computer vision based sorting of atlantic salmon (SALMO SALAR) according to size and shape , 2006, VISAPP.

[51]  M. Dupont-Nivet,et al.  A Polygenic Hypothesis for Sex Determination in the European Sea Bass Dicentrarchus labrax , 2007, Genetics.

[52]  L.-F F. Pau,et al.  Fish Quality Control by Computer Vision , 1991 .