Continuous Adjoint Method for Unstructured Grids

Adjoint-based shape optimization methods have proven to be computationally efficient for aerodynamic problems. The majority of the studies on adjoint methods have used structured grids to discretize the computational domain. Because of the potential advantages of unstructured grids for complex configurations, in this study we have developed and validated a continuous adjoint formulation for unstructured grids. The hurdles posed in the computation of the gradient for unstructured grids are resolved by using a reduced gradient formulation. The methods to impose thickness constraints on unstructured grids are also discussed. The results for two- and three-dimensional simulations of airfoils and wings in inviscid transonic flow are used to validate the design procedure. Finally, the design procedure is applied to redesign the shape of a transonic business jet configuration; we were able to reduce the inviscid drag of the aircraft from 235 to 216 counts resulting in a shock-free wing. Although the Euler equations are the focus of the study in this paper of the adjoint-based approach, the solution of the adjoint system and gradient formulation can be conceptually extended to viscous flows. The approach presented in this study has been successfully used by the first and third authors for viscous flows using structured grids. However, particular aspects of the design process, such as the robustness of the mesh deformation process for unstructured grids, need more attention for viscous flows and are therefore the subject of ongoing research.

[1]  M. J. Rimlinger,et al.  Constrained Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Adjoint Formulation and Parallel Computers , 1997 .

[2]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation , 1997 .

[3]  Antony Jameson,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL OF UNSTEADY FLOWS USING A TIME ACCURATE METHOD , 2002 .

[4]  J. Steger,et al.  Implicit Finite-Difference Simulations of Three-Dimensional Compressible Flow , 1980 .

[5]  A. Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization techniques based on control theory , 1998 .

[6]  T. Barth Aspects of Unstructured Grids and Finite-Volume Solvers for the Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations , 1994 .

[7]  A. Jameson,et al.  Improvements to the aircraft Euler method , 1987 .

[8]  A. Jameson,et al.  Reduction of the Adjoint Gradient Formula in the Continuous Limit , 2003 .

[9]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Single-Point and Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of High-Speed Civil Transport , 2001 .

[10]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  Multigrid solution of the Navier-Stokes equations on triangular meshes , 1989 .

[11]  A. Jameson Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory , 1995 .

[12]  C. Tomlin,et al.  Second order adjoint-based optimization of ordinary and partial differential equations with application to air traffic flow , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..

[13]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Wings including Planform Variations , 2003 .

[14]  A Jameson,et al.  CALCULATION OF IN VISCID TRANSONIC FLOW OVER A COMPLETE AIRCRAFT , 1986 .

[15]  Jaime Peraire,et al.  Aerodynamic design using unstructured meshes , 1996 .

[16]  A. Jameson,et al.  G-Force: The Design Of An Unlimited Class Reno Racer , 2000 .

[17]  A. Jameson Optimum aerodynamic design via boundary control , 1994 .

[18]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[19]  A. Jameson,et al.  Optimum Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier–Stokes Equations , 1997 .

[20]  Raymond M. Hicks,et al.  AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION USING UNSTRUCTURED GRID METHODS , 2002 .

[21]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations , 1997 .

[22]  J. Lions Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations , 1971 .