Formalizing the IMA Language: Toward the Minimalist Program for Compositional Semantics

Computational semantics via logical approach mainly focuses on the composition of meanings. Traditional approaches to it are based on typed logic via categorial grammar, which are not so successful when applied to very different languages than English. Recently, some alternative approaches with flatter types and underspecified semantics have been proposed. This paper is in the same line of these alternatives, but goes further and thoroughly. To avoid the presumed grammatical and semantic rules which are not universal across languages, we give a logic for a hypothetical language called the Isolating-Monocategorial-Associational (IMA) language, which can be assumed to be a prototype of natural languages with minimal grammar and semantics. We also give several extensions of the logic, motivated by different specifications. By formalizing the IMA language, we intend to reveal the universal mechanism of semantic composition in natural languages and to propose a general framework for compositional semantics.

[1]  Miltiadis Kokkonidis,et al.  First-Order Glue , 2008, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[2]  Richard Montague,et al.  The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English , 1973 .

[3]  Noam Chomsky Essays on Form and Interpretation , 1977 .

[4]  M. Labelle THE ACQUISITION OF GRAMMATICAL CATEGORIES: THE STATE OF THE ART , 2005 .

[5]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  LFG Semantics via Constraints , 1993, EACL.

[6]  Glyn Morrill,et al.  Type Logical Grammar: Categorial Logic of Signs , 1994 .

[7]  Michael Moortgat,et al.  Categorial Type Logics , 1997, Handbook of Logic and Language.

[8]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[9]  R. Montague Formal philosophy; selected papers of Richard Montague , 1974 .

[10]  Richard Montague,et al.  ENGLISH AS A FORMAL LANGUAGE , 1975 .

[11]  Henri Cohen,et al.  Handbook of categorization in cognitive science , 2005 .

[12]  Anne Preller,et al.  Toward discourse representation via pregroup grammars , 2007, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[13]  David Gil,et al.  Chapter 15 – ISOLATING-MONOCATEGORIAL-ASSOCIATIONAL LANGUAGE , 2005 .

[14]  Dan Flickinger,et al.  Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction , 2005 .

[15]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Language and mind: Let’s get the issues straight! , 2003 .

[16]  David Gil,et al.  Isolating-Monocategorial-Associational language , 2017 .

[17]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[18]  L. Matthewson,et al.  Universals in semantics , 2008 .

[19]  B. Carpenter,et al.  Type-Logical Semantics , 1997 .

[20]  Rushen Shi,et al.  EARLY SYNTACTIC CATEGORIES IN INFANTS' LANGUAGE , 2005 .

[21]  Ágnes Kurucz,et al.  Towards a natural language semantics without functors and operands , 2008, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[22]  Yoad Winter,et al.  Syncategorematic Conjunction and Structured Meanings , 1995 .

[23]  Michael Moortgat Categorial Type Logics , 1997, Handbook of Logic and Language.