Sequencing dynamic storage systems with multiple lifts and shuttles

New types of Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (AS/RS) able to achieve high throughput are continuously being developed and require new control polices to take full advantage of the developed system. In this paper, a dynamic storage system has been studied as developed by Vanderlande Industries, consisting of a conveyor, two non-passing lifts that share a mast, multiple transfer shuttles, and a storage rack. This study is concerned with the scheduling problem of these two lifts, i.e. which lift is going to handle which (storage or retrieval) request, and in which order. An integrated look-ahead strategy heuristic to simultaneously assign a set of pre-defined requests to the lifts and the order in which they will be handled taking into account delays caused by interference between the lifts. A practical methodology to characterize the system to identify and resolve situations where the lifts would interfere with each other is presented. Experimental results compare several priority rules to handle interference between lifts, and provide empirical evidence that the dynamic system with multiple lifts controlled by the proposed look-ahead strategy achieved average improvements of 44.34% and 35.82% in terms of total handling times (82.49% and 60.08% in terms of throughput) compared to a single lift system and to a simple rule of thumb, respectively.

[1]  Wen-Jing Hsu,et al.  Travel time analysis of a new automated storage and retrieval system , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  Charles G. Petersen,et al.  A comparison of picking, storage, and routing policies in manual order picking , 2004 .

[3]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Third edition , 1994 .

[4]  Charles J. Malmborg,et al.  A network queuing approach for evaluation of performance measures in autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Michal Tzur,et al.  A lookahead partitioning heuristic for a new assignment and scheduling problem in a distribution system , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  How much can lookahead help in online single machine scheduling , 2008, Inf. Process. Lett..

[7]  Bhaba R. Sarker,et al.  Travel time models in automated storage/retrieval systems: A critical review , 1995 .

[8]  Charles J. Malmborg,et al.  Design models for unit load storage and retrieval systems using autonomous vehicle technology and resource conserving storage and dwell point policies , 2007 .

[9]  Iris F. A. Vis,et al.  Sequencing Two Cooperating Automated Stacking Cranes in a Container Terminal , 2010, Transp. Sci..

[10]  Kees Jan Roodbergen,et al.  A survey of literature on automated storage and retrieval systems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Charles J. Malmborg,et al.  Simulation based experimental design to identify factors affecting performance of AVS/RS , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[12]  Charles J. Malmborg Conceptualizing tools for autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems , 2002 .

[13]  Sunderesh S. Heragu,et al.  Simulation based performance analysis of an autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval system , 2011, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[14]  Wen-Jing Hsu,et al.  Load shuffling algorithms for split-platform AS/RS , 2010 .