Environmental and economic impacts of preemptive remanufacturing policies for block and stringer pallets

Abstract The use of pallets is crucial in supply chain and transportation processes, with wood pallets representing the most common packaging type in the US and in Europe. This work focuses on the environmental and economic impact of wood pallet reverse logistics, quantifying the context in which preemptive remanufacturing schedules are useful. Preemptive schedules allow the service provider to reduce transportation emissions and costs by combining multiple pallet components remanufacturing activities. However, this advantage has to be weighed against the losses associated with repairing or replacing a still functional component earlier than required. An integer linear optimization model analyzes this trade-off, first from an environmental then from an economic perspective. This model is applied using the two most common pallet types as case studies: 48- by 40-inch stringer and block pallets. Different handling and loading scenarios are considered. The impact of transportation distance on the efficiency of preemptive policies is explored through a sensitivity analysis. Results show the positive impact of preemptive remanufacturing on costs and CO2-equivalent emissions in all scenarios, with larger benefits in good handling or light loading scenarios.

[1]  Antonio Forcina,et al.  An activity based costing model for evaluating effectiveness of RFID technology in pallet reverse logistics system , 2015 .

[2]  Mike Hewitt,et al.  On the environmental impacts of pallet management operations , 2011 .

[3]  Jonas Bengtsson,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of One-way and Pooled Pallet Alternatives , 2015 .

[4]  Jennifer A. Pazour,et al.  Investigating the Environmental and Economic Impact of Loading Conditions and Repositioning Strategies for Pallet Pooling Providers , 2018 .

[5]  Jonghun Park,et al.  Investigation of Fundamental Relationships to Improve the Sustainability of Unit Loads , 2015 .

[6]  Philip Araman,et al.  Pallet recovery, repair and remanufacturing in a changing industry: 1992 to 2006 , 2010 .

[7]  Jennifer A. Pazour,et al.  Improving the Environmental Sustainability of Pallet Logistics Through Preemptive Remanufacturing: an Integer Linear Optimization Model , 2018 .

[8]  Nathan Samuel Gerber Investigation of new and recovered wood shipping platforms in the United States , 2020, BioResources.

[9]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  Characterizing the Carbon Footprint of Wood Pallet Logistics , 2014 .

[10]  Jiqiang Cao The development of a durability procedure for pallets with structural panel decking , 1993 .

[11]  Jennifer A. Pazour,et al.  Carbon footprint analysis of pallet remanufacturing , 2016 .

[12]  H. Wee,et al.  Three-echelon supply chain model considering carbon emission and item deterioration , 2019, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[13]  George Karaphillis,et al.  A perspective on the reverse logistics of plastic pallets in Canada , 2018, Journal of Remanufacturing.

[14]  W. B. Wallin,et al.  Effect of wood pallet design on structural durability: a statistical analysis of observed in-service damage , 1987 .

[15]  Gaël Raballand,et al.  How Do Differing Standards Increase Trade Costs? The Case of Pallets , 2005 .

[16]  Mehmet Soysal,et al.  Closed-loop Inventory Routing Problem for returnable transport items , 2016 .

[17]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Returnable transport packaging in developing countries: drivers, barriers and business performance , 2017 .

[18]  K. Govindan,et al.  Capacity and production planning with carbon emission constraints , 2017 .

[19]  Mohammed Rida Ech-Charrat,et al.  Dynamic hybrid approach for reusable containers management in a close-loop supply chain , 2016, 2016 5th International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS).

[20]  Christoph H. Glock,et al.  Decision support models for managing returnable transport items in supply chains: A systematic literature review , 2017 .

[21]  Debjit Roy,et al.  Selection of pallet management strategies based on carbon emissions impact , 2015 .

[22]  Urs Buehlmann,et al.  Ban on landfilling of wooden pallets in North Carolina: an assessment of recycling and industry capacity. , 2009 .

[23]  Debjit Roy,et al.  Cost-effective pallet management strategies , 2016 .

[24]  E. Bottani,et al.  Minimization of the Environmental Emissions of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Case Study of Returnable Transport Assets Management , 2018 .

[25]  Namhun Kim,et al.  Environmental and economic assessment of closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing and returnable transport items , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[26]  Hao Xu,et al.  An optimization model for the operations of a pallet pool with both radio-frequency identification–tagged pallets and non-tagged pallets , 2018 .

[27]  Barry R. Cobb,et al.  Inventory control for returnable transport items in a closed-loop supply chain , 2016 .

[28]  Allen H. Tai,et al.  Optimising truckload operations in third-party logistics: A carbon footprint perspective in volatile supply chain , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.