Composition and Decomposition in Bimanual Dynamic Learning

Our ability to skillfully manipulate an object often involves the motor system learning to compensate for the dynamics of the object. When the two arms learn to manipulate a single object they can act cooperatively, whereas when they manipulate separate objects they control each object independently. We examined how learning transfers between these two bimanual contexts by applying force fields to the arms. In a coupled context, a single dynamic is shared between the arms, and in an uncoupled context separate dynamics are experienced independently by each arm. In a composition experiment, we found that when subjects had learned uncoupled force fields they were able to transfer to a coupled field that was the sum of the two fields. However, the contribution of each arm repartitioned over time so that, when they returned to the uncoupled fields, the error initially increased but rapidly reverted to the previous level. In a decomposition experiment, after subjects learned a coupled field, their error increased when exposed to uncoupled fields that were orthogonal components of the coupled field. However, when the coupled field was reintroduced, subjects rapidly readapted. These results suggest that the representations of dynamics for uncoupled and coupled contexts are partially independent. We found additional support for this hypothesis by showing significant learning of opposing curl fields when the context, coupled versus uncoupled, was alternated with the curl field direction. These results suggest that the motor system is able to use partially separate representations for dynamics of the two arms acting on a single object and two arms acting on separate objects.

[1]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Electromyographic Correlates of Learning an Internal Model of Reaching Movements , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  E. Vaadia,et al.  Primary motor cortex is involved in bimanual coordination , 1998, Nature.

[3]  Jinsung Wang,et al.  Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Robert L Sainburg,et al.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Patton,et al.  Single Limb Performance Following Contralateral Bimanual Limb Training , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  J. Kelso Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Kawato,et al.  Adaptation to Stable and Unstable Dynamics Achieved By Combined Impedance Control and Inverse Dynamics Model , 2003 .

[9]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Simultaneous bimanual dynamics are learned without interference , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  A Neuroeconomics Approach to Inferring Utility Functions in Sensorimotor Control , 2004, PLoS biology.

[12]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Failure to Consolidate the Consolidation Theory of Learning for Sensorimotor Adaptation Tasks , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[15]  E Bizzi,et al.  Motor learning by field approximation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Stephan P Swinnen,et al.  Exploring interlimb constraints during bimanual graphic performance: effects of muscle grouping and direction , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  J. Massion Movement, posture and equilibrium: Interaction and coordination , 1992, Progress in Neurobiology.

[19]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Predicting the Consequences of Our Own Actions: The Role of Sensorimotor Context Estimation , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Johansson,et al.  How a Lateralized Brain Supports Symmetrical Bimanual Tasks , 2006, PLoS biology.

[21]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Actions and Consequences in Bimanual Interaction Are Represented in Different Coordinate Systems , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  David W Franklin,et al.  Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Stephen H Scott,et al.  Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.