Interdependence, social motives, and outcome satisfaction in multiparty negotiation

What makes negotiators satisfied with their outcomes? In this study, we examined whether interpersonal interdependence, in the context of multi-party multi-issue negotiation, affected negotiators' satisfaction with their individual and group outcomes. We integrated principles from interdependence, social comparison, and social value theories to generate hypotheses about the social-evaluative nature of satisfaction with negotiation outcomes. Controlling for differences in quality of individual outcomes, we found a positive association between satisfaction and individual outcome and a negative association between satisfaction and group outcome. Relative to those with prosocial social value orientation, negotiators with an individualistic social value orientation were less satisfied with the group outcome, regardless of induced motivational orientation. Neither motivational orientation nor an interaction between motivational orientation and social value orientation were related to satisfaction. We discuss the implications of our results for research on interdependence processes in negotiations and the role of social motives. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  C. McClintock,et al.  Social value related response latencies: Unobtrusive evidence for individual differences in information processing , 1993 .

[3]  George P. Knight,et al.  Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic social values: An individualized regression and clustering approach. , 1984 .

[4]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[5]  David M. Messick,et al.  Social values and egocentric bias: Two tests of the might over morality hypothesis. , 1988 .

[6]  P. V. Lange,et al.  The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. , 1999 .

[7]  Andrzej Nowak,et al.  ‘Numerical trap’. A new look at outcome representation in studies on choice behaviour , 1988 .

[8]  David M. Messick,et al.  Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data , 1985 .

[9]  J. V. Wood,et al.  Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes , 1989 .

[10]  Kathleen M. O'connor MOTIVES AND COGNITIONS IN NEGOTIATION: A THEORETICAL INTEGRATION AND AN EMPIRICAL TEST , 1997 .

[11]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Social Value Orientations and Impressions of Partner's Honesty and Intelligence: A Test of the Might Versus Morality Effect , 1994 .

[12]  D. M. Kuhlman,et al.  Causal attribution of choice behavior in three N-Person Prisoner's Dilemmas , 1988 .

[13]  Mara Olekalns Context, issues and frame as determinants of negotiated outcomes , 1994 .

[14]  G. Knight,et al.  Information Processing and the Development of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Social Values. , 1985 .

[15]  L. Thompson,et al.  Social Judgment, Feedback, and Interpersonal Learning in Negotiation , 1994 .

[16]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  M. Deutsch Chapter 2 – Interdependence and Psychological Orientation1 , 1982 .

[18]  L. Thompson The influence of experience on negotiation performance , 1990 .

[19]  Donald W. Griesinger,et al.  Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games , 1973 .

[20]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1977 .

[21]  Scott T. Allison,et al.  Social Value Orientation and Helping Behavior1 , 1989 .

[22]  M. Patchen,et al.  A Conceptual Framework and Some Empirical Data Regarding Comparisons of Social Rewards , 1961 .

[23]  M. Rokeach The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[24]  Robbert Sanderman,et al.  The relationship between social comparison processes and personality , 1996 .

[25]  R. Bennett,et al.  The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. , 1993 .

[26]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[27]  Matthew G. Chin,et al.  The effects of intergroup discrimination and social values on level of self‐esteem in the minimal group paradigm , 1993 .

[28]  H. Raiffa The art and science of negotiation , 1983 .

[29]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Social value orientation and intelligence: A test of the goal prescribes rationality principle , 1991 .

[30]  Sylvia G. Roch,et al.  Effects of environmental uncertainty and Social value orientation in resource dilemmas , 1997 .

[31]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Social value orientations and negotiator outcomes , 1996 .

[32]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Car Versus Public Transportation? The Role of Social Value Orientations in a Real‐Life Social Dilemma1 , 1995 .

[33]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: a transformational analysis , 1988 .

[34]  D. Messick,et al.  Motivational bases of choice in experimental games , 1968 .

[35]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Motivational bases in mixed-motive interactions: The effects of comparison levels ☆ , 1974 .

[36]  Jan Fekke Ybema,et al.  Aiming at the top? Upward social comparison of abilities after failure , 1993 .

[37]  C. Agnew,et al.  From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships? , 1997 .

[38]  E. Diener,et al.  Subjective well-being. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  P. V. Lange,et al.  The impact of social value orientations on negotiator cognition and behavior , 1995 .

[40]  L. R. Hoffman Group Problem Solving1 , 1965 .

[41]  David M. Messick,et al.  Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis , 1986 .

[42]  Harold H. Kelley,et al.  Expanding the analysis of social orientations by reference to the sequential-temporal structure of situations , 1997 .

[43]  C. Insko,et al.  The similarity-attraction relationship: Is there an ideal one? , 1982 .

[44]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  "Fixed Pie" a la Mode: Information Availability, Information Processing, and the Negotiation of Suboptimal Agreements , 1995 .

[45]  D. M. Kuhlman,et al.  Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  George R. Goethals,et al.  Social Comparison Theory , 1986 .

[47]  H. Kelley,et al.  Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. , 1970 .

[48]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. , 1975 .

[49]  David M. Messick,et al.  A framework for social motives. , 1976 .

[50]  F. Crosby,et al.  A model of egoistical relative deprivation. , 1976 .

[51]  D. M. Kuhlman,et al.  Expectations of choice behavior held by cooperators, competitors, and individualists across four classes of experimental games. , 1976 .

[52]  H. Kelley,et al.  Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence , 1978 .

[53]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Might versus Morality Explored: Motivational and Cognitive Bases for Social Motives , 1991 .

[54]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Real and ideal others in romantic relationships: Is four a crowd? , 1985 .

[55]  R. Oliver,et al.  Outcome Satisfaction in Negotiation: A Test of Expectancy Disconfirmation , 1994 .

[56]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Heuristics in Negotiation: Limitations to Effective Dispute Resolution , 1983 .

[57]  John B. Knox,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Labor Relations. , 1966 .

[58]  William G. Austin,et al.  Internal standards revisited: Effects of social comparisons and expectancies on judgments of fairness and satisfaction , 1980 .

[59]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. , 1985 .

[60]  J. Iedema,et al.  Perceived consensus of one's social value orientation in different populations in public and private circumstances , 1995 .

[61]  William L. Ury,et al.  Getting to Yes , 2019, Boy on the Bridge.