A scalable 3D fracture and fragmentation algorithm based on a hybrid, discontinuous Galerkin, Cohesive Element Method

Abstract A scalable algorithm for modeling dynamic fracture and fragmentation of solids in three dimensions is presented. The method is based on a combination of a discontinuous Galerkin (DG) formulation of the continuum problem and cohesive zone models (CZM) of fracture. Prior to fracture, the flux and stabilization terms arising from the DG formulation at interelement boundaries are enforced via interface elements, much like in the conventional intrinsic cohesive element approach, albeit in a way that guarantees consistency and stability. Upon the onset of fracture, the traction–separation law (TSL) governing the fracture process becomes operative without the need to insert a new cohesive element. Upon crack closure, the reinstatement of the DG terms guarantee the proper description of compressive waves across closed crack surfaces. The main advantage of the method is that it avoids the need to propagate topological changes in the mesh as cracks and fragments develop, which enables the indistinctive treatment of crack propagation across processor boundaries and, thus, the scalability in parallel computations. Another advantage of the method is that it preserves consistency and stability in the uncracked interfaces, thus avoiding issues with wave propagation typical of intrinsic cohesive element approaches. A simple problem of wave propagation in a bar leading to spall at its center is used to show that the method does not affect wave characteristics and, as a consequence, properly captures the spall process. We also demonstrate the ability of the method to capture intricate patterns of radial and conical cracks arising in the impact of ceramic plates, which propagate in the mesh impassive to the presence of processor boundaries.

[1]  Francisco Armero,et al.  Numerical simulation of dynamic fracture using finite elements with embedded discontinuities , 2009 .

[2]  René de Borst,et al.  Mesh-independent discrete numerical representations of cohesive-zone models , 2006 .

[3]  F. P. Bowden,et al.  The brittle fracture of solids by liquid impact, by solid impact, and by shock , 1964, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  Michael Ortiz,et al.  An Efficient Adaptive Procedure for Three-Dimensional Fragmentation Simulations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[5]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Computational Methods for Transient Analysis , 1985 .

[6]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Statistical Properties of Residual Stresses and Intergranular Fracture in Ceramic Materials , 1993 .

[7]  M. Ortiz,et al.  FINITE-DEFORMATION IRREVERSIBLE COHESIVE ELEMENTS FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL CRACK-PROPAGATION ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[8]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Effect of inhomogeneities on dynamic crack growth in an elastic solid , 1997 .

[9]  Ludovic Noels,et al.  A general discontinuous Galerkin method for finite hyperelasticity. Formulation and numerical applications , 2006 .

[10]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Analysis of three‐dimensional crack initiation and propagation using the extended finite element method , 2005 .

[11]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  Dynamic solid particle damage in brittle materials: an appraisal , 1977 .

[12]  Paul Steinmann,et al.  A hybrid discontinuous Galerkin/interface method for the computational modelling of failure , 2004 .

[13]  R. Haber,et al.  An adaptive spacetime discontinuous Galerkin method for cohesive models of elastodynamic fracture , 2010 .

[14]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Numerical simulations of dynamic crack growth along an interface , 1996 .

[15]  E. Dvorkin,et al.  Finite elements with displacement interpolated embedded localization lines insensitive to mesh size and distortions , 1990 .

[16]  Glaucio H. Paulino,et al.  A general topology-based framework for adaptive insertion of cohesive elements in finite element meshes , 2008, Engineering with Computers.

[17]  M. Ortiz,et al.  A finite element method for localized failure analysis , 1987 .

[18]  Donald A. Shockey,et al.  Failure phenomenology of confined ceramic targets and impacting rods , 1990 .

[19]  Julian C. Cummings,et al.  A Virtual Test Facility for the Simulation of Dynamic Response in Materials , 2002, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[20]  Raul Radovitzky,et al.  Advances in Cohesive Zone Modeling of Dynamic Fracture , 2009 .

[21]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing , 1999 .

[22]  F. Brezzi,et al.  Discontinuous Galerkin approximations for elliptic problems , 2000 .

[23]  Glaucio H. Paulino,et al.  Extrinsic cohesive modelling of dynamic fracture and microbranching instability in brittle materials , 2007 .

[24]  H. Espinosa,et al.  A grain level model for the study of failure initiation and evolution in polycrystalline brittle materials. Part I: Theory and numerical implementation , 2003 .

[25]  M. E. Gulden,et al.  Impact damage in brittle materials in the elastic-plastic response régime , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[26]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Tetrahedral mesh generation based on node insertion in crystal lattice arrangements and advancing-front-Delaunay triangulation , 2000 .

[27]  Arun Shukla,et al.  Dynamic failure of materials and structures , 2010 .

[28]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Analysis of Multilevel Graph Partitioning , 1995, Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM SC95 Conference.

[29]  J. Davenport Editor , 1960 .

[30]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Physics-based modeling of brittle fracture: Cohesive formulations and the application of meshfree methods , 2000 .

[31]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials , 1996 .

[32]  D. S. Dugdale Yielding of steel sheets containing slits , 1960 .

[33]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Three‐dimensional cohesive modeling of dynamic mixed‐mode fracture , 2001 .

[34]  J. W. Foulk An examination of stability in cohesive zone modeling , 2010 .

[35]  Ludovic Noels,et al.  An explicit discontinuous Galerkin method for non‐linear solid dynamics: Formulation, parallel implementation and scalability properties , 2008 .

[36]  G. I. Barenblatt THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF EQUILIBRIUM CRACKS IN BRITTLE FRACTURE , 1962 .

[37]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  An extended finite element method for modeling crack growth with frictional contact , 2001 .

[38]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Parallel Simulations of Dynamic Fracture Using Extrinsic Cohesive Elements , 2009, J. Sci. Comput..

[39]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Solid modeling aspects of three-dimensional fragmentation , 1998, Engineering with Computers.

[40]  A. Needleman,et al.  A cohesive segments method for the simulation of crack growth , 2003 .

[41]  Michael Ortiz,et al.  A cohesive model of fatigue crack growth , 2001 .

[42]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids , 1994 .

[43]  Alejandro Mota,et al.  Fracture and fragmentation of simplicial finite element meshes using graphs , 2006 .

[44]  Douglas N. Arnold,et al.  Unified Analysis of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Elliptic Problems , 2001, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[45]  Kent T. Danielson,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis on parallel computers using FORTRAN 90 and MPI 1 This pape , 1998 .

[46]  S. Rebay,et al.  A High-Order Accurate Discontinuous Finite Element Method for the Numerical Solution of the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1997 .