Rapid detection of microbiota cell type diversity using machine-learned classification of flow cytometry data

The study of complex microbial communities typically entails high-throughput sequencing and downstream bioinformatics analyses. Here we expand and accelerate microbiota analysis by enabling cell type diversity quantification from multidimensional flow cytometry data using a supervised machine learning algorithm of standard cell type re cogn ition (CellCognize). As a proof-of-concept, we trained neural networks with 32 microbial cell and bead standards. The resulting classifiers were extensively validated in silico on known microbiota, showing on average 80% prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the classifiers could detect shifts in microbial communities of unknown composition upon chemical amendment, comparable to results from 16S-rRNA-amplicon analysis. CellCognize was also able to quantify population growth and estimate total community biomass productivity, providing estimates similar to those from 14 C-substrate incorporation. CellCognize complements current sequencing-based methods by enabling rapid routine cell diversity analysis. The pipeline is suitable to optimize cell recognition for recurring microbiota types, such as in human health or engineered systems. Duygan et al. develop a supervised machine learning algorithm, CellCognize, to quantify cell type diversity from multidimensional flow cytometry data. Their model achieves 80% prediction accuracy, detects shifts in microbial communities of unknown composition and quantifies population growth and biomass productivity. Their work will be useful to study microbiota in human health or engineered systems.

[1]  J. R. van der Meer,et al.  A flow cytometry based oligotrophic pollutant exposure test to detect bacterial growth inhibition and cell injury. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  A. Lopez-Urrutia,et al.  Seasonality in molecular and cytometric diversity of marine bacterioplankton: the re-shuffling of bacterial taxa by vertical mixing. , 2015, Environmental microbiology.

[3]  P. Bakker,et al.  Deciphering the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Disease-Suppressive Bacteria , 2011, Science.

[4]  J. Gordon,et al.  Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system , 2011, Nature.

[5]  Nima Aghaeepour,et al.  Flow Cytometry Bioinformatics , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  Christin Koch,et al.  Dynamics in the microbial cytome-single cell analytics in natural systems. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[7]  Nico Boon,et al.  Measuring the biodiversity of microbial communities by flow cytometry , 2016 .

[8]  Alexander J. Probst,et al.  Stable isotope informed genome-resolved metagenomics reveals that Saccharibacteria utilize microbially-processed plant-derived carbon , 2017, Microbiome.

[9]  J. Paul Robinson,et al.  Automated classification of bacterial particles in flow by multiangle scatter measurement and support vector machine classifier , 2008, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[10]  Lynne Boddy,et al.  Identification of 72 phytoplankton species by radial basis function neural network analysis of flow cytometric data , 2000 .

[11]  N. Fierer Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome , 2017, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[12]  Willem Waegeman,et al.  Learning Single‐Cell Distances from Cytometry Data , 2019, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[13]  Francisco Feijó Delgado,et al.  High-throughput measurement of single-cell growth rates using serial microfluidic mass sensor arrays , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  P. Engel,et al.  Genomic diversity landscape of the honey bee gut microbiota , 2019, Nature Communications.

[15]  S. Müller,et al.  Functional single-cell analyses: flow cytometry and cell sorting of microbial populations and communities. , 2010, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[16]  W. Waegeman,et al.  Absolute quantification of microbial taxon abundances , 2016, The ISME Journal.

[17]  J. Fuhrman,et al.  Significance of Size and Nucleic Acid Content Heterogeneity as Measured by Flow Cytometry in Natural Planktonic Bacteria , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  Jesse R. Zaneveld,et al.  Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  J S Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Flow cytometric bacterial cell counts challenge conventional heterotrophic plate counts for routine microbiological drinking water monitoring. , 2017, Water research.

[20]  Christin Koch,et al.  Cytometric fingerprinting for analyzing microbial intracommunity structure variation and identifying subcommunity function , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[21]  Kaustubh D Bhalerao,et al.  Machine learning analysis of microbial flow cytometry data from nanoparticles, antibiotics and carbon sources perturbed anaerobic microbiomes , 2018, Journal of Biological Engineering.

[22]  K. Zengler,et al.  Elucidation of complexity and prediction of interactions in microbial communities , 2017, Microbial biotechnology.

[23]  N. Moran,et al.  Dynamic microbiome evolution in social bees , 2017, Science Advances.

[24]  S. Manalis,et al.  Direct single-cell biomass estimates for marine bacteria via Archimedes’ principle , 2016, The ISME Journal.

[25]  Francesco Asnicar,et al.  Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2 , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  T. Hübschmann,et al.  Resolution of natural microbial community dynamics by community fingerprinting, flow cytometry, and trend interpretation analysis. , 2011, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[27]  T. Hübschmann,et al.  Cytometric patterns reveal growth states of Shewanella putrefaciens , 2014, Microbial biotechnology.

[28]  J. Carstensen,et al.  Monitoring natural phytoplankton communities: a comparison between traditional methods and pulse-shape recording flow cytometry , 2017 .

[29]  Patrick Mäder,et al.  Combining high-throughput imaging flow cytometry and deep learning for efficient species and life-cycle stage identification of phytoplankton , 2018, BMC ecology.

[30]  Jun Wang,et al.  Quantitative microbiome profiling links gut community variation to microbial load , 2017, Nature.

[31]  Thomas Bell,et al.  Abundance determines the functional role of bacterial phylotypes in complex communities , 2018, Nature Microbiology.

[32]  Trevor C. Charles,et al.  Multisubstrate Isotope Labeling and Metagenomic Analysis of Active Soil Bacterial Communities , 2014, mBio.

[33]  Judy H. Cho,et al.  Gut microbiota density influences host physiology and is shaped by host and microbial factors , 2018, bioRxiv.

[34]  Willem Waegeman,et al.  Stripping flow cytometry: How many detectors do we need for bacterial identification? , 2017, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[35]  Hongzhe Li,et al.  Quantifying and comparing bacterial growth dynamics in multiple metagenomic samples , 2018, Nature Methods.

[36]  B. De Baets,et al.  Flow cytometric fingerprinting for microbial strain discrimination and physiological characterization , 2018, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[37]  W. Waegeman,et al.  Flow Cytometric Single-Cell Identification of Populations in Synthetic Bacterial Communities , 2017, PloS one.

[38]  J. Klima,et al.  Determination of Bacterial Cell Dry Mass by Transmission Electron Microscopy and Densitometric Image Analysis , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[39]  J. R. van der Meer,et al.  Use of flow cytometric methods for single-cell analysis in environmental microbiology. , 2008, Current opinion in microbiology.