Design optimization and uncertainty analysis of SMA morphing structures

The continuing implementation of shape memory alloys (SMAs) as lightweight solid-state actuators in morphing structures has now motivated research into finding optimized designs for use in aerospace control systems. This work proposes methods that use iterative analysis techniques to determine optimized designs for morphing aerostructures and consider the impact of uncertainty in model variables on the solution. A combination of commercially available and custom coded tools is utilized. ModelCenter, a suite of optimization algorithms and simulation process management tools, is coupled with the Abaqus finite element analysis suite and a custom SMA constitutive model to assess morphing structure designs in an automated fashion. The chosen case study involves determining the optimized configuration of a morphing aerostructure assembly that includes SMA flexures. This is accomplished by altering design inputs representing the placement of active components to minimize a specified cost function. An uncertainty analysis is also conducted using design of experiment methods to determine the sensitivity of the solution to a set of uncertainty variables. This second study demonstrates the effective use of Monte Carlo techniques to simulate the variance of model variables representing the inherent uncertainty in component fabrication processes. This paper outlines the modeling tools used to execute each case study, details the procedures for constructing the optimization problem and uncertainty analysis, and highlights the results from both studies.

[1]  A. V. Srinivasan,et al.  Smart Structures: Analysis and Design , 2000 .

[2]  Fred van Keulen,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of shape memory alloy shells , 2008 .

[3]  D. Lagoudas,et al.  A thermodynamical constitutive model for shape memory materials. Part I. The monolithic shape memory alloy , 1996 .

[4]  I. Elishakoff,et al.  Convex models of uncertainty in applied mechanics , 1990 .

[5]  Sung Nam Jung,et al.  Optimal design of a variable-twist proprotor incorporating shape memory alloy hybrid composites , 2011 .

[6]  John Yen,et al.  Design and Implementation of a Shape Memory Alloy Actuated Reconfigurable Airfoil , 2003 .

[7]  Richard D. Widdle,et al.  Optimal design of a shape memory alloy actuated composite structure with iterative finite element analysis , 2009, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[8]  Fred van Keulen,et al.  Design optimization of shape memory alloy active structures using the R-phase transformation , 2007, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[9]  Frederick T. Calkins,et al.  Boeing's variable geometry chevron: morphing aerospace structures for jet noise reduction , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[10]  Dimitris C. Lagoudas,et al.  Analysis and optimization of improved hybrid SMA flexures for high rate actuation , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[11]  Dimitris C. Lagoudas,et al.  Use of a Ni60Ti shape memory alloy for active jet engine chevron application: II. Experimentally validated numerical analysis , 2009 .

[12]  D. Lagoudas Shape memory alloys : modeling and engineering applications , 2008 .

[13]  Fred van Keulen,et al.  Modeling of shape memory alloy shells for design optimization , 2008 .

[14]  G. Buckner,et al.  Design optimization of a shape memory alloy–actuated robotic catheter , 2012 .

[15]  Dimitris C. Lagoudas,et al.  Use of a Ni60Ti shape memory alloy for active jet engine chevron application: I. Thermomechanical characterization , 2009 .

[16]  Chao-Chieh Lan,et al.  Optimal design of rotary manipulators using shape memory alloy wire actuated flexures , 2009 .

[17]  Justin Manzo,et al.  Analysis and optimization of the active rigidity joint , 2009 .

[18]  Dimitris C. Lagoudas,et al.  Advanced methods for the analysis, design, and optimization of SMA-based aerostructures , 2011 .

[19]  S. Shapiro,et al.  THE JOHNSON SYSTEM: SELECTION AND PARAMETER ESTIMATION , 1980 .

[20]  Shuang Wang,et al.  A computational inverse problem approach for the design of morphing processes in thermally activated smart structural materials , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[21]  Charles E. Clark,et al.  Monte Carlo , 2006 .

[22]  F. J. Carrera-Hueso,et al.  Análisis de sensibilidad estructural , 2011 .

[23]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  GA-based optimum design of a shape memory alloy device for seismic response mitigation , 2010 .

[24]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Recent Advances in Optimization of Smart Structures and Actuators , 2003 .

[25]  James H. Mabe,et al.  Overview of Boeing’s Shape Memory Alloy Based Morphing Aerostructures , 2008 .

[26]  D. Lagoudas,et al.  Numerical implementation of a shape memory alloy thermomechanical constitutive model using return mapping algorithms , 2000 .

[27]  James H. Mabe,et al.  Analysis of Shape Memory Alloy Components Using Beam, Shell, and Continuum Finite Elements , 2010 .

[28]  Y. Ben-Haim Robust reliability in the mechanical sciences , 1996 .

[29]  Antonio Concilio,et al.  Optimization and integration of shape memory alloy (SMA)-based elastic actuators within a morphing flap architecture , 2012 .

[30]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[31]  L. G. Machado,et al.  Constitutive model for the numerical analysis of phase transformation in polycrystalline shape memory alloys , 2012 .

[32]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[33]  Georges Dumont,et al.  Finite element simulation for design optimisation of shape memory alloy spring actuators , 2005 .