Using Computational Intelligence for Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Screen-Film Mammograms

In recent years, artificial neural network (ANN) techniques have dominated the relatively new field of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), particularly in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Most of these studies relied on a classic ANN paradigm, namely, the single-hidden-layer, fully-interconnected, feed-forward, error-back-propagation network, which used sigmoid activation functions. Although versatile and popular, this classic ANN approach has many limitations. In particular, the gradient descent technique used to train network weights is susceptible to entrapment in local minima. Furthermore, the number of hidden nodes are fixed and chosen arbitrarily. To achieve a desired level of performance, too many hidden nodes are frequently used, resulting in overfitting of the training cases, which compromises the network's ability to generalize to new cases it has not seen before. To address these limitations, the evolutionary computing (EC) paradigm was investigated as an alternative to the classic ANN paradigm. The EC paradigm is a stochastic optimization technique, consisting of a blend of evolutionary programming (EP) and evolutionary strategies (ES), which numerically addresses (but is not immune from) the problem of entrapment in local minima. Using available mammographic findings and patient history, researchers applied these techniques to the problem of predicting whether a breast lesion was benign or malignant. Mammographic findings were used because mammography is the most widely used radiologic modality for the early detection of breast cancer. However, only 15-34% of women who undergo a breast biopsy for a mammographically suspicious, nonpalpable lesion actually have breast cancer. Thus, 66-€“85% of the biopsies performed today could be avoided if these lesions could be classified accurately using the information from a mammogram.

[1]  E. Sickles Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. , 1991, Radiology.

[2]  E. Ashley,et al.  Better decisions through science: exercise testing scores. , 2003, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[3]  G Wolf,et al.  [Evaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma]. , 2001, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[4]  Shouxin Ren,et al.  Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of four metals by the kernel partial least squares method , 1999 .

[5]  C. Floyd,et al.  Case-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic findings for breast biopsy decisions. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  K Doi,et al.  An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. , 1996, Medical physics.

[7]  C. Floyd,et al.  Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. , 1995, Radiology.

[8]  S. Wold,et al.  The kernel algorithm for PLS , 1993 .

[9]  Kristin P. Bennett,et al.  An Optimization Perspective on Kernel Partial Least Squares Regression , 2003 .

[10]  C. Floyd,et al.  Effect of patient history data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic findings with artificial neural networks. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[11]  S. Wold,et al.  PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics , 2001 .

[12]  Svante Wold,et al.  Personal memories of the early PLS development , 2001 .

[13]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Evolutionary computation: Toward a new philosophy of machine intelligence , 1997, Complex..

[14]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Robert E. Schapire,et al.  A Brief Introduction to Boosting , 1999, IJCAI.

[16]  Thomas Boehm,et al.  Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system , 2001, European Radiology.

[17]  Roman Rosipal,et al.  Kernel Partial Least Squares Regression in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space , 2002, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[18]  Charles E. Heckler,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2005, Technometrics.

[19]  K L Lam,et al.  Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network. , 1995, Medical physics.

[20]  J A Swets,et al.  Better decisions through science. , 2000, Scientific American.

[21]  C. Floyd,et al.  Cross-institutional evaluation of BI-RADS predictive model for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning , 1995 .

[23]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.

[24]  C E Floyd,et al.  Predicting breast cancer invasion with artificial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features. , 1997, Radiology.

[25]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Improved Boosting Algorithms Using Confidence-rated Predictions , 1998, COLT' 98.

[26]  Timothy Masters,et al.  Data fusion of several support-vector-machine breast-cancer diagnostic paradigms using a GRNN oracle , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[27]  K L Lam,et al.  Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Shouxin Ren,et al.  Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of copper(II), lead(II) and cadrnium(II) , 1995, The Journal of automatic chemistry.

[29]  Shouxin Ren,et al.  Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of manganese, zinc and cobalt by kernel partial least–squares method , 1998, The Journal of automatic chemistry.

[30]  H. Wold Path Models with Latent Variables: The NIPALS Approach , 1975 .

[31]  John C. Platt,et al.  Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization, advances in kernel methods , 1999 .

[32]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[33]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[34]  David B. Fogel,et al.  Evolutionary computation - toward a new philosophy of machine intelligence (3. ed.) , 1995 .

[35]  David B. Fogel,et al.  Evolutionary Computation: Towards a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence , 1995 .

[36]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[37]  S. Orel,et al.  BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. , 1999, Radiology.

[38]  M. Giger,et al.  Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. , 1996, Radiology.

[39]  Ilse C. F. Ipsen,et al.  THE IDEA BEHIND KRYLOV METHODS , 1998 .

[40]  J Y Lo,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: artificial neural network approach for optimized merging of mammographic features. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[41]  D. Kopans The positive predictive value of mammography. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  C. Floyd,et al.  Effect of patient histoy data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic findings with artificial neural networks , 1999 .

[43]  Walker H. Land,et al.  Breast cancer screening using evolved neural networks , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[44]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Learning with kernels , 1998 .

[45]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Beware of q2! , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[46]  D. Signorini,et al.  Neural networks , 1995, The Lancet.

[47]  Jinbo Bi,et al.  Regression Error Characteristic Curves , 2003, ICML.

[48]  G. Wolf,et al.  Evaluierung eines computerassistierten Diagnosesystems in der Erkennung des Mammakarzinoms , 2001 .

[49]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[50]  J. J. Gisvold,et al.  Likelihood of malignant disease for various categories of mammographically detected, nonpalpable breast lesions. , 1993, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[51]  Ki Keun Oh,et al.  Mammographic Evaluation of Suspicious Malignant Lesions Based on ACR(American College of Radiology) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System( BI-RADS ) , 1999 .