Eye movements and optical flow.

Translation of an observer through a static environment generates a pattern of optical flow that specifies the direction of self-motion, but the retinal flow pattern is confounded by pursuit eye movements. How does the visual system decompose the translational and rotational components of flow to determine heading? It is shown that observers can perceive their direction of self-motion during stationary fixations and pursuit eye movements and with displays that simulate the optical effects of eye movements. Results indicate that the visual system can perform the decomposition with both continuous and discontinuous fields on the basis of flow-field information alone but requires a three-dimensional environmental structure to do so. The findings are inconsistent with general computational models and theories based on the maximum of divergence, oculomotor signals, or multiple fixations but are consistent with the theory of reliance on differential motion produced by environmental variation in depth.

[1]  J. Gibson.  The visual perception of objective motion and subjective movement. , 1994, Psychological review.

[2]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Extraction of Higher Order Derivatives of the Optical Velocity Vector Field: Limitations Imposed By Biological Hardware , 1985 .

[3]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[4]  K. Prazdny,et al.  Determining The Instantaneous Direction Of Motion From Optical Flow Generated By A Curvilinearly Moving Observer , 1981, Other Conferences.

[5]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[6]  G. Orban,et al.  Influence of a moving textured background on direction selectivity of cat striate neurons. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Rigid body motion from depth and optical flow , 1983, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[8]  W. H. Ittelson.  Visual space perception , 1961 .

[9]  R W Cumming,et al.  The role of optical expansion patterns in locomotor control. , 1973, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction. , 1983, Science.

[11]  J E Cutting,et al.  Visual flow and direction of locomotion. , 1985, Science.

[12]  J J Gibson,et al.  What gives rise to the perception of motion? , 1968, Psychological review.

[13]  E. Holst.  Relations between the central Nervous System and the peripheral organs , 1954 .

[14]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections , 1981, Nature.

[15]  Daniel J. Hannon,et al.  Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow , 1988, Nature.

[16]  J H Rieger,et al.  Processing differential image motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Passive navigation , 1982, Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing.

[18]  A. Verri,et al.  Mathematical properties of the two-dimensional motion field: from singular points to motion parameters , 1989 .

[19]  Allen M. Waxman,et al.  Surface Structure and Three-Dimensional Motion from Image Flow Kinematics , 1985 .

[20]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Exterospecific component of the motion parallax field. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[21]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Estimating three-dimensional motion parameters of a rigid planar patch , 1981 .

[22]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Estimating three-dimensional motion parameters of a rigid planar patch, III: Finite point correspondences and the three-view problem , 1984 .

[23]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Local structure of movement parallax of the plane , 1976 .

[24]  Tadasu Oyama,et al.  Visual Space Perception , 1962 .

[25]  A. Remole.  PERCEPTION WITH AN EYE FOR MOTION , 1987 .

[26]  W. Warren,et al.  Perception of translational heading from optical flow. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Uniqueness and Estimation of Three-Dimensional Motion Parameters of Rigid Objects with Curved Surfaces , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[28]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The interpretation of a moving retinal image , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[29]  H C Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The visual ambiguity of a moving plane , 1984, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[30]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual flow and direction of locomotion. , 1985, Science.

[31]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Invariant Properties of the Motion Parallax Field due to the Movement of Rigid Bodies Relative to an Observer , 1975 .

[32]  J H Rieger,et al.  Information in optical flows induced by curved paths of observation. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[33]  D Regan,et al.  How do we avoid confounding the direction we are looking and the direction we are moving? , 1982, Science.