Recursively updating the error forecasting scheme of a complementary modelling framework for improved reservoir inflow forecasts

Summary Reservoir inflow forecasting is an integral element of hydropower systems operation and is of paramount importance to hydropower producers. Effective forecasts directly impact power production scheduling, which in turn effects the revenues earned from power production. In this study, we implement a filter updating procedure (GU-COMP) that updates the gains on the error-forecasting component of a complementary forecasting framework (COMP) that also comprises a conceptual model with time invariant parameters. The GU-COMP procedure is applied for forecasting hourly flows of the Krinsvatn catchment (207 km 2 ; located in Norway) over a forecast lead-time of 24 h. The gain coefficients are considered as the only state variables and are updated daily using the error observed between measured and forecasted flows at the catchment outlet. The performance is rated based on evaluation of filter performance (i.e. convergence and consistency), and relative assessment of forecasting skills using the root mean square error (RMSE) and the percentage volume error (PVE) metrics. Bracketing close to 95% of the innovation sequences within two standard deviations from the mean, the filter is found to be well behaved. The RMSE and PVE metrics agree that GU-COMP outperforms COMP in reducing the forecast errors, and significantly altering distributional characteristics of the PVEs in the spring and summer seasons. It is also noted that the relative forecast accuracy enhancement diminishes for forecast lead-times beyond 20 time steps (hours).

[1]  H. Medina,et al.  Kalman filters for assimilating near-surface observations into the Richards equation – Part 1: Retrieving state profiles with linear and nonlinear numerical schemes , 2012 .

[2]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  Hydrologic Data Assimilation , 2012 .

[3]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter , 2005 .

[4]  Lihua Xiong,et al.  Comparison of four updating models for real-time river flow forecasting , 2002 .

[5]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2002 .

[6]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[7]  A. Bronstert,et al.  Climate change impacts on the seasonality and generation processes of floods - projections and uncertainties for catchments with mixed snowmelt/rainfall regimes , 2015 .

[8]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation , 2008 .

[9]  A. Shamseldin,et al.  Assessing the performance of eight real-time updating models and procedures for the brosna river , 2005 .

[10]  M. Clark,et al.  Operational hydrological data assimilation with the recursive ensemble Kalman filter , 2013 .

[11]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models , 2008 .

[12]  A. Weerts,et al.  Particle filtering and ensemble Kalman filtering for state updating with hydrological conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 2006 .

[13]  C. M. DeChant,et al.  Improving the characterization of initial condition for ensemble streamflow prediction using data assimilation , 2011 .

[14]  Kieran M. O'Connor,et al.  A reappraisal of the Kalman filtering technique, as applied in river flow forecasting , 1994 .

[15]  D. Kavetski,et al.  Confronting Input Uncertainty in Environmental Modelling , 2013 .

[16]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[17]  Arnold W. Heemink,et al.  Application of advanced data assimilation methods for the initialisation of storm surge models , 1998 .

[18]  Real time flood forecasting on the River Rhine , 1985 .

[19]  V. Singh,et al.  The HBV model. , 1995 .

[20]  Seong Jin Noh,et al.  Advancing data assimilation in operational hydrologic forecasting: progresses, challenges, and emerging opportunities , 2012 .

[21]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods , 2000 .

[22]  Hamid Moradkhani,et al.  Examining the effectiveness and robustness of sequential data assimilation methods for quantification of uncertainty in hydrologic forecasting , 2012 .

[23]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Validation and Intercomparison of Different Updating Procedures for Real-Time Forecasting , 1997 .

[24]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Evolution of ensemble data assimilation for uncertainty quantification using the particle filter‐Markov chain Monte Carlo method , 2012 .

[25]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  An ensemble approach for attribution of hydrologic prediction uncertainty , 2008 .

[26]  Jinling Wang,et al.  Evaluating the Performances of Adaptive Kalman Filter Methods in GPS/INS Integration , 2010 .

[27]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  Seasonal hydrologic prediction in the United States: understanding the role of initial hydrologic conditions and seasonal climate forecast skill , 2011 .

[28]  C. M. DeChant,et al.  Analyzing the sensitivity of drought recovery forecasts to land surface initial conditions , 2015 .

[29]  David Gustafsson,et al.  The surface energy balance of a snow cover: comparing measurements to two differentsimulation models , 2001 .

[30]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter , 2005 .

[31]  R. K. Kachroo.  River flow forecasting. Part 1. A discussion of the principles , 1992 .

[32]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Stochastic semi-continuous simulation for extreme flood estimation in catchments with combined rainfall–snowmelt flood regimes , 2013 .

[33]  George Kuczera,et al.  Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors , 2010 .

[34]  L. Feyen,et al.  Assessing parameter, precipitation, and predictive uncertainty in a distributed hydrological model using sequential data assimilation with the particle filter , 2009 .

[35]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Bayesian calibration and uncertainty analysis of hydrological models: A comparison of adaptive Metropolis and sequential Monte Carlo samplers , 2011 .

[36]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Data assimilation in the MIKE 11 Flood Forecasting system using Kalman filtering , 2003 .

[37]  G. Evensen.  Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi‐geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics , 1994 .

[38]  A. Weerts,et al.  Skill of a global seasonal streamflow forecasting system, relative roles of initial conditions and meteorological forcing , 2013 .

[39]  Qingyun Duan,et al.  An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction , 2006 .

[40]  A W Jayawardena.  Environmental and Hydrological Systems Modelling , 2014 .

[41]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Improving real-time inflow forecasting into hydropower reservoirs through a complementary modelling framework , 2014 .

[42]  Armando Brath,et al.  Neural networks and non-parametric methods for improving real-time flood forecasting through conceptual hydrological models , 2002 .

[43]  G. Lannoy,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of model state variables and observation and forecast biases using a two-stage hybrid Kalman filter , 2012 .

[44]  Yuguo Chen,et al.  State and parameter estimation of hydrologic models using the constrained ensemble Kalman filter , 2009 .

[45]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Real-Time Variational Assimilation of Hydrologic and Hydrometeorological Data into Operational Hydrologic Forecasting , 2003 .

[46]  K. Beven.  Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer , 2012 .

[47]  E. Todini.  Hydrological catchment modelling: past, present and future , 2007 .

[48]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Modeling the catchment via mixtures: Issues of model specification and validation , 2005 .

[49]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Hydrologic data assimilation using particle Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation: Theory, concepts and applications (online first) , 2012 .

[50]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Adaptive state updating in real-time river flow forecasting—a combined filtering and error forecasting procedure , 2005 .

[51]  E. Wood,et al.  The role of initial conditions and forcing uncertainties in seasonal hydrologic forecasting , 2009 .

[52]  J. C. Refsgaard,et al.  Application of the Kalman filter to real time operation and to uncertainty analyses in hydrological modelling , 1985 .

[53]  Keith Beven,et al.  Adaptive correction of deterministic models to produce probabilistic forecasts , 2012 .

[54]  Scott A. Sisson,et al.  Efficient hydrological model parameter optimization with Sequential Monte Carlo sampling , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[55]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  General Review of Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: Model Calibration, Data Assimilation, and Uncertainty Analysis , 2009 .