The Downside of Self-Management: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects tf Conflict on Trust, Autonomy, and Task Interdependence in Self-Managing Teams
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Hambrick,et al. FACTIONAL GROUPS: A NEW VANTAGE ON DEMOGRAPHIC FAULTLINES, CONFLICT, AND DISINTEGRATION IN WORK TEAMS , 2005 .
[2] Claus W. Langfred. Autonomy and Performance in Teams: The Multilevel Moderating Effect of Task Interdependence , 2005 .
[3] M. Taylor,et al. Extending the Chain of Relationships Among Organizational Justice, Social Exchange, and Employee Reactions: The Role of Contract Violations , 2005 .
[4] Claus W. Langfred. Too Much of a Good Thing? Negative Effects of High Trust and Individual Autonomy in Self-Managing Teams , 2004 .
[5] Kristin Behfar,et al. The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study , 2003 .
[6] Diether Gebert,et al. The Risks of Autonomy: Empirical Evidence for the Necessity of a Balance Management in Promoting Organizational Innovativeness , 2003 .
[7] Y. Vardi,et al. Misbehavior in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Management , 2003 .
[8] C. D. De Dreu,et al. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[9] S. Kozlowski,et al. Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .
[10] John Cordery,et al. Trust, individualism and job characteristics as predictors of employee preference for teamwork , 2003 .
[11] R. Wageman. How Leaders Foster Self-Managing Team Effectiveness: Design Choices Versus Hands-on Coaching , 2001 .
[12] Bruce Fortado. The Metamorphosis of Workplace Conflict , 2001 .
[13] John E. Mathieu,et al. A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .
[14] R. Bies,et al. How employees respond to personal offense: the effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.
[15] Claus W. Langfred. The paradox of self‐management: individual and group autonomy in work groups , 2000 .
[16] Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al. Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.
[17] Murray R. Barrick,et al. Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .
[18] G. Northcraft,et al. You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .
[19] Dennis J. Devine. Effects of Cognitive Ability, Task Knowledge, Information Sharing, and Conflict on Group Decision-Making Effectiveness , 1999 .
[20] Gretchen M. Spreitzer,et al. Giving Up Control without Losing Control , 1999, Group & Organization Management.
[21] J. H. Davis,et al. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. , 1999 .
[22] R. Peterson,et al. Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .
[23] Gareth R. Jones,et al. The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .
[24] J. Colquitt,et al. KNOWLEDGE WORKER TEAM EFFECTIVENESS: THE ROLE OF AUTONOMY, INTERDEPENDENCE, TEAM DEVELOPMENT, AND CONTEXTUAL SUPPORT VARIABLES , 1997 .
[25] S. G. Cohen,et al. What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .
[26] George P. Baker,et al. Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance , 1997 .
[27] R. Liden,et al. Task Interdependence as a Moderator of the Relation Between Group Control and Performance , 1997 .
[28] Gerald E. Ledford,et al. A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness , 1996 .
[29] B. Lilly,et al. THE EFFECTS OF CONFLICT, TRUST, AND TASK COMMITMENT ON PROJECT TEAM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .
[30] Allen C. Amason. Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .
[31] Roderick M. Kramer,et al. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .
[32] J. H. Davis,et al. An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .
[33] K. Jehn. A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .
[34] R. Wageman. Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .
[35] Daniel J. McAllister. Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .
[36] K. Jehn. ENHANCING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VALUE‐BASED INTRAGROUP CONFLICT , 1994 .
[37] Gerald E. Ledford,et al. The Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams: A Quasi-Experiment , 1994 .
[38] Gina J. Medsker,et al. RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .
[39] Lawrence R. James,et al. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. , 1993 .
[40] J. Barker. Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .
[41] L. James,et al. rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .
[42] R. Saavedra,et al. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .
[43] John Cordery,et al. Attitudinal and Behavioral Effects of Autonomous Group Working: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1991 .
[44] James A. Breaugh,et al. The Work Autonomy Scales: Additional Validity Evidence , 1989 .
[45] Shelley E. Taylor,et al. Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.
[46] Elizabeth C. Ravlin,et al. The Design and Activation of Self-Regulating Work Groups , 1987 .
[47] S. Barley. Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.
[48] A. Giddens. The Constitution of Society , 1985 .
[49] M. Kiggundu. Task interdependence and job design: test of a theory. , 1983, Organizational behavior and human performance.
[50] H. P. Sims,et al. A Typology for Integrating Technology, Organization, and Job Design , 1980 .
[51] Jacob Cohen,et al. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .
[52] J. Fleiss,et al. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.
[53] John M. Jermier,et al. Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .
[54] Richard,et al. Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .
[55] Edward L. Deci,et al. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.
[56] Dale E. Zand. Trust and Managerial Problem Solving , 1972 .
[57] D. Pugh,et al. Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .
[58] M. Deutsch. Trust and suspicion , 1958 .
[59] L. Thompson,et al. Conflict within and between organizational groups: Functional, dysfunctional, and quasi-functional perspectives , 2007 .
[60] Dustin K. Jundt,et al. Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.
[61] Paul E. Spector,et al. The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior. , 2005 .
[62] Paul E. Spector,et al. Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets. , 2005 .
[63] Karen A. Jehn,et al. INTRAGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONFLICT-OUTCOME RELATIONSHIP , 2003 .
[64] Linda Deleon. Accountability for Individuating Behaviors in Self-Managing Teams , 2001 .
[65] R. Golembiewski. Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .
[66] E.,et al. GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .
[67] S. Kozlowski,et al. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. , 2000 .
[68] P. Bliese. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .
[69] Roderick M. Kramer,et al. Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.
[70] Aneil Mishra. ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES TO CRISIS: THE CENTRALITY OF TRUST , 1996 .
[71] Roderick M. Kramer,et al. Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .
[72] R. E. Miles,et al. Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls. , 1996 .
[73] R. Lewicki,et al. Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .
[74] Edwin A. Locke,et al. Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study , 1994 .
[75] Richard A. Guzzo,et al. Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .
[76] J. Hackman,et al. The psychology of self-management in organizations , 1986 .
[77] D. A. Kenny,et al. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[78] J. Richard Hackman,et al. Psychology and work : productivity, change, and employment , 1986 .
[79] E. Shils. The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .
[80] James D. Thompson. Organizations in Action , 1967 .