The Current Status of the IS Discipline: A Survey of American and International Business Schools

Questions of IS's status as an academic discipline have been debated within and outside the IS community since the inception of the field. Strangely, members of the IS community find ourselves asking those same questions as did our peers some 25 years ago. The community has answered critical questions relating to reference disciplines, dependent variables, and the building of a cumulative tradition. Yet we are still grappling with such issues as our status in relation to and interaction with other disciplines, IS practice in the business environment, the role of IS in business school curricula-and in some cases the survival of IS departments-and a new issue, our place in the developing international business arena. This study surveyed over 1,000 business school deans and IS department heads in the United States and over 50 overseas countries to determine the current status of the IS discipline. The survey queried respondents concerning the status of IS curricula and research issues in their institutions. Analysis indicates that differences exist between academic methodology in North American and International institutions in both curriculum and philosophical approaches to degree requirements. Universally, IS scholars believed that the future of IS as an academic discipline is more certain than in the fie ld' s early years, although there is a wide range of opinions as to the optimum areas for academic exploration.

[1]  R. Daft,et al.  Language and Organization , 1979 .

[2]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[3]  K. Krippendorff.  Krippendorff, Klaus, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980. , 1980 .

[4]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Management Information Systems Area: Problems, Challenges and Opportunities , 1980, ICIS.

[5]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Mis Research: Reference disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition , 1980, ICIS.

[6]  Richard L. Nolan,et al.  Toward a comprehensive framework for MIS research , 1980 .

[7]  Sean Tate.  Q-Sort as a Needs Assessment Technique , 1982 .

[8]  Richard Harris,et al.  SMIS Members: A Membership Analysis , 1982, MIS Q..

[9]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key Information Systems Issues for the 1980's , 1984, MIS Q..

[10]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[11]  Martin Herbert,et al.  1985 Opinion Survey of MIS Managers: Key Issues , 1986, MIS Q..

[12]  J. Thanopoulos,et al.  International Business Education in the AACSB Schools , 1987 .

[13]  L. C. Nehrt.  The Internationalization of the Curriculum , 1987 .

[14]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key issues in information systems management , 1987 .

[15]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key Issues in Information Systems - 1986 , 1987, MIS Q..

[16]  Larry G. Daniel,et al.  Stability of Q-Factors across Two Data Collection Methods. , 1989 .

[17]  James C. Emery.  Editor's comments: what does the CIO need to know about information technology? , 1989 .

[18]  Maurice Landry,et al.  Can the field of MIS be disciplined? , 1989, CACM.

[19]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Information Systems Management Issues for the 1990s , 1991, MIS Q..

[20]  Charles H. Mawhinney,et al.  The Implications of Declining Enrollments in Undergraduate CIS Programs in the United States , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Business Communication as a Discipline: Perceptions of American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) Deans. , 1994 .

[22]  Martin Richards,et al.  The ten most valuable components of an information systems education , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Martin D. Goslar,et al.  A comparative study of information system curriculum in U.S. and foreign universities , 1994, DATB.

[24]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Critical Skills and Knowledge Requirements of IS Professionals: A Joint Academic/Industry Investigation , 1995, MIS Q..

[25]  J. Daniel Couger,et al.  IS '95: guidelines for undergraduate IS curriculum , 1995 .