Permeability evolution in fractured coal: The roles of fracture geometry and water-content

Abstract We report laboratory experiments that investigate the permeability evolution of an anthracite coal as a function of applied stress and pore pressure at room temperature as an analog to other coal types. Experiments are conducted on 2.5 cm diameter, 2.5–5 cm long cylindrical samples at confining stresses of 6 to 12 MPa. Permeability and sorption characteristics are measured by pulse transient methods, together with axial and volumetric strains for both inert (helium (He)) and strongly adsorbing (methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2)) gases. To explore the interaction of swelling and fracture geometry we measure the evolution of mechanical and transport characteristics for three separate geometries — sample A containing multiple small embedded fractures, sample B containing a single longitudinal through-going fracture and sample C containing a single radial through-going fracture. Experiments are conducted at constant total stress and with varied pore pressure — increases in pore pressure represent concomitant (but not necessarily equivalent) decreases in effective stress. For the samples with embedded fractures (A and C) the permeability first decreases with an increase in pressure (due to swelling and fracture constraint) and then increases near-linearly (due to the over-riding influence of effective stresses). Conversely, this turnaround in permeability from decreasing to increasing with increasing pore pressure is absent in the discretely fractured sample (B) — the influence of the constraint of the connecting fracture bridges in limiting fracture deformation is importantly absent as supported by theoretical considerations. Under water saturated conditions, the initial permeabilities to all gases are nearly two orders of magnitude lower than for dry coal and permeabilities increase with increasing pore pressure for all samples and at all gas pressures. We also find that the sorption capacities and swelling strains are significantly reduced for water saturated samples — maybe identifying the lack of swelling as the primary reason for the lack of permeability decrease. Finally, we report the weakening effects of gas sorption on the strength of coal samples by loading the cores to failure. Results surprisingly show that the strength of the intact coal (sample A) is smaller than that of the axially fractured coal (sample B) due to the extended duration of exposure to CH4 and CO2. Average post-failure particle size for the weakest intact sample (A) is found to be three times larger than that of the sample B, based on the sieve analyses from the samples after failure. We observe that fracture network geometry and saturation state exert important influences on the permeability evolution and strength of coal under in situ conditions.

[1]  Structural determinations of Pennsylvania anthracites , 1999 .

[2]  Xiexing Miao,et al.  Development of anisotropic permeability during coalbed methane production , 2010 .

[3]  S. Durucan,et al.  The effects of stress and fracturing on permeability of coal , 1986 .

[4]  Katarzyna Czerw Methane and carbon dioxide sorption/desorption on bituminous coal—Experiments on cubicoid sample cut from the primal coal lump , 2011 .

[5]  A. Busch,et al.  Experimental study of gas and water transport processes in the inter-cleat (matrix) system of coal: Anthracite from Qinshui Basin, China , 2010 .

[6]  P. Walker,et al.  Densities, porosities and surface areas of coal macerals as measured by their interaction with gases, vapours and liquids , 1988 .

[7]  Jonny Rutqvist,et al.  A New Coal-Permeability Model: Internal Swelling Stress and Fracture–Matrix Interaction , 2010 .

[8]  Marco Mazzotti,et al.  Competitive adsorption equilibria of CO2 and CH4 on a dry coal , 2008 .

[9]  A. Busch,et al.  Methane and CO2 sorption and desorption measurements on dry Argonne premium coals: pure components and mixtures , 2003 .

[10]  R. A. Schraufnagel,et al.  Shrinkage of coal matrix with release of gas and its impact on permeability of coal , 1990 .

[11]  Phung Quoc Huy,et al.  Carbon dioxide gas permeability of coal core samples and estimation of fracture aperture width , 2010 .

[12]  Ian D. Palmer,et al.  How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model , 1998 .

[13]  Andreas Busch,et al.  Measurement and interpretation of supercritical CO2 sorption on various coals , 2007 .

[14]  Jerzy Ziętek,et al.  Binary gas sorption/desorption experiments on a bituminous coal: Simultaneous measurements on sorption kinetics, volumetric strain and acoustic emission , 2009 .

[15]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Adsorption-induced coal swelling and stress: Implications for methane production and acid gas sequestration into coal seams , 2007 .

[16]  Suresh K. Bhatia,et al.  High-Pressure Adsorption of Methane and Carbon Dioxide on Coal , 2006 .

[17]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Selective transport of CO2, CH4, and N2 in coals: insights from modeling of experimental gas adsorption data , 2004 .

[18]  A. Saghafi,et al.  CO2 storage and gas diffusivity properties of coals from Sydney Basin, Australia , 2007 .

[19]  Jeffrey R. Levine,et al.  Model study of the influence of matrix shrinkage on absolute permeability of coal bed reservoirs , 1996, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[20]  V. Rudolph,et al.  Sorption-induced swelling/shrinkage and permeability of coal under stressed adsorption/desorption conditions , 2010 .

[21]  S. Kelemen,et al.  Physical properties of selected block Argonne Premium bituminous coal related to CO2, CH4, and N2 adsorption , 2009 .

[22]  Ghazal Izadi,et al.  Permeability evolution of fluid-infiltrated coal containing discrete fractures , 2011 .

[23]  Ji-Quan Shi,et al.  A numerical simulation study of the Allison Unit CO2-ECBM pilot: The impact of matrix shrinkage and swelling on ECBM production and CO2 injectivity , 2005 .

[24]  Marco Mazzotti,et al.  Role of adsorption and swelling on the dynamics of gas injection in coal - article no. B04203 , 2009 .

[25]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  The effect of CO2 saturation on mechanical properties of Australian black coal using acoustic emission , 2010 .

[26]  Richard L. Christiansen,et al.  Measurement of Sorption-Induced Strain , 2005 .

[27]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Coal swelling strain and permeability change with injecting liquid/supercritical CO2 and N2 at stress-constrained conditions , 2011 .

[28]  K. Wolf,et al.  Differential swelling and permeability change of coal in response to CO2 injection for ECBM , 2008 .

[29]  S. Reeves,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Matrix Shrinkage and Differential Swelling on Coalbed Methane Recovery and Carbon Sequestration , 2003 .

[30]  V. Rudolph,et al.  Changes in pore structure of anthracite coal associated with CO2 sequestration process , 2010 .

[31]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  A model for changes in coalbed permeability during primary and enhanced methane, recovery , 2005 .

[32]  Maria Mastalerz,et al.  Carbon dioxide and methane sorption in high volatile bituminous coals from Indiana, USA , 2004 .

[33]  K. Barron,et al.  The effect of gas sorption on the strength of coal , 1988 .

[34]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  FLOW-DEFORMATION RESPONSE OF DUAL-POROSITY MEDIA , 1992 .

[35]  Grant S. Bromhal,et al.  Influence of carbon dioxide on coal permeability determined by pressure transient methods , 2009 .

[36]  Andreas Busch,et al.  High-pressure sorption isotherms and sorption kinetics of CH4 and CO2 on coals , 2010 .

[37]  Victor Rudolph,et al.  An improved permeability model of coal for coalbed methane recovery and CO2 geosequestration , 2009 .

[38]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  The effect of CO2 on the geomechanical and permeability behaviour of brown coal: Implications for coal seam CO2 sequestration , 2006 .

[39]  W. H. Somerton,et al.  Effect of stress on permeability of coal , 1975 .

[40]  C. Peach,et al.  Applied stress reduces the CO2 sorption capacity of coal , 2011 .

[41]  J. Ziętek,et al.  Swelling of coal induced by cyclic sorption/desorption of gas: Experimental observations indicating changes in coal structure due to sorption of CO2 and CH4 , 2010 .

[42]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal: a laboratory and modeling study. 1. Isotherms and pore volume distributions , 1999 .

[43]  David R. Cole,et al.  Adsorption Kinetics of CO2, CH4, and their Equimolar Mixture on Coal from the Black Warrior Basin, West-Central Alabama , 2009 .

[44]  Ender Okandan,et al.  Adsorption and gas transport in coal microstructure: investigation and evaluation by quantitative X-ray CT imaging , 2001 .

[45]  H. Bruining,et al.  Swelling and sorption experiments on methane, nitrogen and carbon dioxide on dry Selar Cornish coal , 2010 .

[46]  D. L. Sikarskie Rock Mechanics Symposium , 1973 .

[47]  John W. Larsen,et al.  The effects of dissolved CO2 on coal structure and properties , 2004 .

[48]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal: a laboratory and modeling study. 2. Adsorption rate modeling , 1999 .

[49]  Sohei Shimada,et al.  Displacement behavior of CH4 adsorbed on coals by injecting pure CO2, N2, and CO2–N2 mixture , 2005 .

[50]  I. Gray,et al.  Reservoir engineering in coal seams , 1983 .

[51]  Andreas Busch,et al.  High-Pressure Sorption of Nitrogen, Carbon Dioxide, and their Mixtures on Argonne Premium Coals , 2007 .

[52]  C. Spiers,et al.  Strain development in unconfined coals exposed to CO2, CH4 and Ar : Effect of moisture , 2009 .

[53]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Laboratory characterisation of coal reservoir permeability for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery , 2010 .

[54]  Yu Wu,et al.  Dual poroelastic response of a coal seam to CO2 injection , 2010 .

[55]  Andreas Busch,et al.  Investigation of high-pressure selective adsorption/desorption behaviour of CO2 and CH4 on coals: An experimental study , 2006 .

[56]  John R. Seidle,et al.  Experimental Measurement of Coal Matrix Shrinkage Due to Gas Desorption and Implications for Cleat Permeability Increases , 1995 .

[57]  Guoliang Chen,et al.  Influence of gas production induced volumetric strain on permeability of coal , 1997 .

[58]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  Methane/CO2 Sorption Modeling for Coalbed Methane Production and CO2 Sequestration , 2006 .

[59]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  Coupled Processes in Subsurface Deformation, Flow, and Transport , 2000 .

[60]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  Permeability of granite under high pressure , 1968 .

[61]  Chakib Bouallou,et al.  Study of an innovative gas-liquid contactor for CO2 absorption , 2011 .

[62]  C. Özgen Karacan,et al.  Swelling-Induced Volumetric Strains Internal to a Stressed Coal Associated with CO2 Sorption , 2007 .

[63]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams , 2005 .

[64]  C. Özgen Karacan,et al.  Heterogeneous Sorption and Swelling in a Confined and Stressed Coal during CO2 Injection , 2003 .

[65]  Stuart Day,et al.  Swelling of Australian coals in supercritical CO2 , 2008 .

[66]  John W. Larsen,et al.  Structure Changes in Pittsburgh No. 8 Coal Caused by Sorption of CO2 Gas , 2005 .

[67]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF VOLUMETRIC SWELLING/SHRINKAGE OF COAL IN SEQUESTRATION OF ACID GASES , 2004 .

[68]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  How sorption-induced matrix deformation affects gas flow in coal seams: A new FE model , 2008 .

[69]  J. D. Bredehoeft,et al.  A Transient Laboratory Method for Determining the Hydraulic Properties of "Tight"Rocks-I, Theory , 1981 .