Statistical Sampling Strategies for Geometric Tolerance Inspection by CMM

More and more often, procedures for profile/surface monitoring and inspection refer to geometric specifications. In fact, the number of form tolerance requirements (such as straightness, roundness, flatness, cylindricity, free-form profiles and surfaces) are increasingly appearing in technical drawings. Usually, Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMMs) are used to measure points on the specific feature under study in order to decide whether the machined item is conforming to requirements. In fact, measured points are used to compute the form error which has to be smaller than the tolerance value to avoid scrapping or reworking. The estimated form error is usually affected by uncertainty, which depends on both the sample size (number of points measured on the profile/surface) and the sampling strategy (location of the points on the profile/surface). The present research work focuses on the second issue and investigates the performance of several existing sampling strategies with the ones achieved by two newly presented approaches. These new approaches explore advantages arising by including a statistical analysis of a set of machined features in the sampling strategy design. Throughout the paper, a real case study concerning flatness tolerance is used as reference.

[1]  R. Wilhelm,et al.  Adaptive sampling for coordinate metrology , 1999 .

[2]  Alistair B. Forbes,et al.  Reference software for finding Chebyshev best-fit geometric elements , 1996 .

[3]  Shivakumar Raman,et al.  Intelligent Search-Based Selection of Sample Points for Straightness and Flatness Estimation , 2003 .

[4]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  A User's Guide to Principal Components. , 1991 .

[5]  Andrea Rossi A form of deviation-based method for coordinate measuring machine sampling optimization in an assessment of roundness , 2001 .

[6]  M. Kendall,et al.  The discarding of variables in multivariate analysis. , 1967, Biometrika.

[7]  Quirico Semeraro,et al.  The harmonic fitting method for the assessment of the substitute geometry estimate error. Part I : 2D and 3D theory , 2001 .

[8]  K. D. Summerhays,et al.  Methods for evaluation of systematic geometric deviations in machined parts and their relationships to process variables , 1999 .

[9]  J. Orestes Cerdeira,et al.  Computational aspects of algorithms for variable selection in the context of principal components , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[10]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Variable selection and the interpretation of principal subspaces , 2001 .

[11]  Massimo Pacella,et al.  On the use of principal component analysis to identify systematic patterns in roundness profiles , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[12]  Shivakumar Raman,et al.  Experimental verification of manufacturing error pattern and its utilization in form tolerance sampling , 2005 .

[13]  Stefano Petrò,et al.  Quality Control of Manufactured Surfaces , 2010 .

[14]  J. M. Baldwin,et al.  Optimizing discrete point sample patterns and measurement data analysis on internal cylindrical surfaces with systematic form deviations , 2002 .

[15]  Shivakumar Raman,et al.  On the selection of flatness measurement points in coordinate measuring machine inspection , 2000 .

[16]  Quirico Semeraro,et al.  The harmonic fitting method for the assessment of the substitute geometry estimate error. Part II: statistical approach, machining process analysis and inspection plan optimisation , 2001 .

[17]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Discarding Variables in a Principal Component Analysis. I: Artificial Data , 1972 .

[18]  Massimo Pacella,et al.  Statistical Process Control for Geometric Specifications: On the Monitoring of Roundness Profiles , 2008 .