A method of identifying and correcting miscoding, misclassification and misdiagnosis in diabetes: a pilot and validation study of routinely collected data

Diabet. Med. 27, 203–209 (2010)

[1]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  Incorrect and incomplete coding and classification of diabetes: a systematic review , 2010, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[2]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  The QICKD study protocol: a cluster randomised trial to compare quality improvement interventions to lower systolic BP in chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[3]  Nick Freemantle,et al.  Effect of the quality and outcomes framework on diabetes care in the United Kingdom: retrospective cohort study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  R. Mori,et al.  Diagnosis of UTI: results of an evidence based approach to guideline development carried out for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) , 2008 .

[5]  K. Khunti,et al.  Obesity and intermediate clinical outcomes in diabetes: evidence of a differential relationship across ethnic groups , 2008, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[6]  A. Majeed,et al.  Identifying undiagnosed diabetes: cross-sectional survey of 3.6 million patients' electronic records. , 2008, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[7]  K. Khunti,et al.  Quality of diabetes care in the UK: comparison of published quality‐of‐care reports with results of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for Diabetes , 2007, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[8]  K. Khunti,et al.  Competing Interests: AM is Associate Director (Primary Care) of , 2022 .

[9]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  Assessing the prevalence, monitoring and management of chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes compared with those without diabetes in general practice , 2007, Diabetic Medicine.

[10]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Routinely collected general practice data: goldmines for research? A report of the European Federation for Medical Informatics Primary Care Informatics Working Group (EFMI PCIWG) from MIE2006, Maastricht, The Netherlands. , 2006, Informatics in primary care.

[11]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: e-Prescribing, Efficiency, Quality: Lessons from the Computerization of UK Family Practice , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Trends in the prevalence and management of diagnosed type 2 diabetes 1994–2001 in England and Wales , 2005, BMC family practice.

[13]  Martin Roland,et al.  Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  A. Majeed,et al.  Workload implications of identifying patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care: population-based study. , 2003, Journal of public health medicine.

[15]  A. Majeed,et al.  Use of Read codes in diabetes management in a south London primary care group: implications for establishing disease registers , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  K. Thiru,et al.  Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  P. Zimmet,et al.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO Consultation , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[18]  M Pringle,et al.  Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[19]  Tom Chan,et al.  Using surrogate markers in primary electronic patient record systems to confirm or refute the diagnosis of diabetes. , 2009, Informatics in primary care.

[20]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  Variation in the recording of diabetes diagnostic data in primary care computer systems: implications for the quality of care. , 2009, Informatics in primary care.

[21]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Flagging fasting plasma glucose specimens: time to routinely label the context in which pathology specimens are recorded. , 2009, Informatics in primary care.

[22]  Jeremy Gray Mrcp Mrcgp,et al.  Ethnicity and Quality of Diabetes Care in a Health System with Universal Coverage: Population-Based Cross-sectional Survey in Primary Care , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[23]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  The optimum granularity for coding diagnostic data in primary care: report of a workshop of the EF , 2006 .

[24]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. , 2006, Family practice.

[25]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  The optimum granularity for coding diagnostic data in primary care: report of a workshop of the EFMI Primary Care Informatics Working Group at MIE 2005. , 2006, Informatics in primary care.

[26]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Ensuring the Quality of Aggregated General Practice Data: Lessons from the Primary Care Data Quality Programme (PCDQ) , 2005, MIE.

[27]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  A system of metadata to control the process of query, aggregating, cleaning and analysing large datasets of primary care data. , 2005, Informatics in primary care.

[28]  Victoria Warmington,et al.  Info-tsunami: surviving the storm with data quality probes. , 2003, Informatics in primary care.

[29]  Simon De Lusignan,et al.  Three steps to data quality. , 2003, Informatics in primary care.

[30]  J G Williams,et al.  Measuring the Completeness and Currency of Codified Clinical Information , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[31]  K. Khunti,et al.  Prevalence of diagnosed diabetes mellitus in general practice in England and Wales, 1994 to 1998 , 2002 .