Memory and Cognitive Control in Task Switching

Cognitive control and memory are fundamentally intertwined, but interactions between the two have only recently received sustained research interest. In the study reported here, we used a novel paradigm to investigate how control influences memory encoding and, conversely, how memory measures can provide new insight into flexible cognitive control. Participants switched between classifying objects and words, then were tested for their recognition memory of items presented in this task-switching phase. Task switching impaired memory for task-relevant information but actually improved memory for task-irrelevant information, which indicates that control demands reduced the selectivity of memory encoding rather than causing a general memory decline. Recognition memory strength provided a robust trial-by-trial measure of the effectiveness of cognitive control that “predicted” earlier task-switching performance. It also revealed a substantial influence of bottom-up factors on between-task competition, but only on trials in which participants had to switch from one type of classification to the other. Collectively, our findings illustrate how cognitive control and bottom-up factors interact to simultaneously influence both current performance and future memory.

[1]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Item-and Task-Level Processes in Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex : Positive and Negative Correlates of Encoding , 2003 .

[3]  H. Haider,et al.  That’s what task sets are for: shielding against irrelevant information , 2008, Psychological research.

[4]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Impact of Visual Distraction on Retrieval of Long-Term Memory , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[7]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  U. Mayr,et al.  Sticky rules: integration between abstract rules and specific actions. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Catherine M Arrington,et al.  Stimulus-based priming of task choice during voluntary task switching. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  M. Chun,et al.  Interactions between attention and memory , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  J. Desmond,et al.  Functional Specialization for Semantic and Phonological Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex , 1999, NeuroImage.

[12]  R De Jong,et al.  An intention-activation account of residual switch costs , 2000 .

[13]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Should I stay or should I switch? A cost-benefit analysis of voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Jumping the gun: is effective preparation contingent upon anticipatory activation in task-relevant neural circuitry? , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Anthony D. Wagner,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex and episodic encoding: Insights from fMRI subsequent memory effects and dual-attention theory , 2009, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[16]  Baptist Liefooghe,et al.  Working memory costs of task switching. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  G. D. Logan Task Switching , 2022 .

[19]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention Based on Long-Term Memory Experience , 2006, Neuron.

[20]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[21]  Dorit Wenke,et al.  The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  B. Hommel,et al.  Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Randy L Buckner,et al.  Functional–Anatomic Correlates of Control Processes in Memory , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  S. Keele,et al.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Contextual control over task-set retrieval. , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[26]  F. Craik,et al.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  The control of long-term memory: Brain systems and cognitive processes , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[30]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  Guidance of attention to objects and locations by long-term memory of natural scenes. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Between-Task Competition and Cognitive Control in Task Switching , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[33]  N. Meiran Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[34]  Myra A. Fernandes,et al.  Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  M. Rugg,et al.  When more means less neural activity related to unsuccessful memory encoding , 2001, Current Biology.