Understanding the Acceptance and Usage of IT Project Management Methodologies: Towards a Conceptual Model supported by Case Studies

Organizations invest considerable resources in the development and implementation of IT project management (IT PM) methodologies to increase productivity and quality as well as to save time, effort, and resources. However, such methodologies are often rejected outright by users. Our research analyzes the determinants of individual usage behavior in order to enable organizations to engineer IT PM methodologies that not only provide strategic benefits but also meet the needs of actual users. The existing literature, especially Triandis’ Theory of Interpersonal Behavior as well as initial case study results from a number of organizations are used to construct a conceptual model. This research model includes four dimensions: a) Value, b) workgroup influence, c) self-beliefs, and d) organizational characteristics, which are all considered to positively influence the development of the intention to use a methodology. Additionally, we find that the effect of intentions on actual usage can be weakened by an individual’s automatic behavior such as habits.

[1]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Investigating Determinants of Software Developers' Intentions to Follow Methodologies , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  N. Denzin.  Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook , 1978 .

[6]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[7]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  The Relationship Between Organisational Culture and the Deployment of Systems Development Methodologies , 2001, CAiSE.

[8]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[9]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior , 1975 .

[10]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Information Technology Continuance: A Theoretic Extension and Empirical Test , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[11]  H C Triandis,et al.  Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[12]  J. Gerring.  Case Study Research: Principles and Practices , 2006 .

[13]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A Dynamic Framework for Classifying Information Systems Development Methodologies and Approaches , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  M. L. Gibson,et al.  System development methodology implementation: perceived aspects of importance , 1999 .

[15]  H. Aarts,et al.  Habit vs. intention in the prediction of future behaviour: the role of frequency, context stability and mental accessibility of past behaviour. , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[16]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  Effects of Process Maturity on Quality, Cycle Time, and Effort in Software Product Development , 2000 .

[17]  Margaret H. Vickers,et al.  Information technology development methodologies , 1999 .

[18]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementing Structured Software Methodologies: A Case of Innovation in Process Technology , 1987 .

[19]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Ana Ortiz de Guinea,et al.  Why break the habit of a lifetime? rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use , 2009 .

[21]  Judy L. Wynekoop,et al.  Systems development methodologies: unanswered questions , 1995, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  S. M. Arnsten.  Intrinsic motivation. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[23]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[24]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[25]  Tore Dybå,et al.  Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[26]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[27]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[28]  Shari Lawrence Pfleeger,et al.  Understanding and improving technology transfer in software engineering , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[29]  D. Feltz,et al.  Current directions in self-efficacy research in sport , 2011 .

[30]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Where now for development methodologies? , 2003, CACM.

[31]  M. Badawy.  Technology Management Education: Alternative Models , 1998 .