The impact of design decisions on post occupancy processes in school buildings

Purpose – This paper aims to review the impact of design and specification decisions for major works during post‐occupancy processes; the routine maintenance and management of school premises. It also seeks to explore the relationship between the main stakeholders and how this impacts decision‐making and the post‐occupancy operation of school buildings.Design/methodology/approach – In addition to a literature review, qualitative data were also obtained through a focus group; a steering group. The steering group consisted of stakeholders tasked with delivering and managing school premises in the Sussex County.Findings – The findings contribute to understanding the impact of design decisions on post‐occupancy processes in schools. A basic model is also presented as a guide for requirements and decision mapping in post‐occupancy design decision processes in schools.Research limitations/implications – The study was conducted with the participation of a representative sample of stakeholders. There may be the n...

[1]  Jan Zabojnõ.  Centralized and Decentralized Decision Making in Organizations , 2002 .

[2]  G. Gigerenzer.  Rationality : why social context matters , 1996 .

[3]  Stephen Emmitt,et al.  The client as a complex system , 2005 .

[4]  Peter Barrett,et al.  Findings from a post‐occupancy evaluation in the UK primary schools sector , 2010 .

[5]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: A portfolio of feedback techniques , 2005 .

[6]  Jan Zabojnik,et al.  Centralized and Decentralized Decision Making in Organizations , 2000, Journal of Labor Economics.

[7]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Assessing building performance , 2005 .

[8]  Karim Hadjri,et al.  Post‐occupancy evaluation: purpose, benefits and barriers , 2009 .

[9]  Thomas Kvan,et al.  Information Standardization from a Design Perspective , 2007 .

[10]  Stuart D. Green,et al.  Modelling client business processes as an aid to strategic briefing , 1999 .

[11]  Colette Rolland,et al.  Modelling and engineering the requirements engineering process: An overview of the NATURE approach , 1997, Requirements Engineering.

[12]  Edward Barrett,et al.  The Mayfield Handbook of Technical and Scientific Writing , 1997 .

[13]  Yehuda E. Kalay,et al.  The impact of information technology on design methods, products and practices , 2006 .

[14]  Charles Egbu,et al.  The adoption of requirements management in the delivery of refurbishment projects , 2005 .

[15]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Industrial Management & Data Systems Integrating product and process information in the construction sector , 2016 .

[16]  F. E. Wolfgang Preiser,et al.  Toward Universal Design Evaluation , 2001 .

[17]  D. M. Gann,et al.  Closing the loop between design and use: post-occupancy evaluation , 2001 .

[18]  A. Smith,et al.  Research Methodology: A Step-by-step Guide for Beginners , 2012 .

[19]  W Wim Zeiler,et al.  Design Collaboration and Team Working , 2007 .

[20]  Nanci Saraiva Moreira,et al.  Improving the quality of school facilities through building performance assessment: Educational reform and school building quality in São Paulo, Brazil , 2009 .

[21]  John M. Kamara,et al.  Capturing client requirements in construction projects , 2002 .

[22]  Geoffrey Qiping Shen,et al.  Briefing from a facilities management perspective , 2005 .

[23]  Bo-Christer Björk.  Information Technology in Construction – Domain Definition and Research Issues , 1999 .

[24]  Piette,et al.  Documenting Performance Metrics in a Building Life-cycle Information System , 1998 .

[25]  Clark A. Cory.  Utilization of 2D, 3D, or 4D CAD in construction communication documentation , 2001, Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Information Visualisation.

[26]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[27]  James Douglas.  Building Adaptation, Second Edition , 2006 .