A neural network model for optimizing vowel recognition by cochlear implant listeners

Due to the variability in performance among cochlear implant (CI) patients, it is becoming increasingly important to find ways to optimally fit patients with speech processing strategies. This paper proposes an approach based on neural networks, which can be used to automatically optimize the performance of CI patients. The neural network model is implemented in two stages. In the first stage, a neural network is trained to mimic the CI patient's performance on the vowel identification task. The trained neural network is then used in the second stage to adjust a free parameter to improve vowel recognition performance for each individual patient. The parameter examined in this study was a weighting function applied to the compressed channel amplitudes extracted from a 6-channel continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) strategy. Two types of weighting functions were examined, one which assumed channel interaction, and one which assumed no interaction between channels. Results showed that the neural network models closely matched the performance of five Med-El/CIS-Link implant patients. The resulting weighting functions obtained after neural network training improved vowel performance, with the larger improvement (4%) attained by the weighting function which modeled channel interaction.

[1]  M. Dorman,et al.  The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  M F Dorman,et al.  The recognition of vowels produced by men, women, boys, and girls by cochlear implant patients using a six-channel CIS processor. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Timothy Masters,et al.  Practical neural network recipes in C , 1993 .

[4]  P.C. Laizou,et al.  Signal-processing techniques for cochlear implants , 1999, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[5]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[6]  H J McDermott,et al.  A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M F Dorman,et al.  Changes in Speech Intelligibility as a Function of Time and Signal Processing Strategy for an Ineraid Patient Fitted with Continuous Interleaved Sampling (CIS) Processors , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[8]  M A Svirsky,et al.  Mathematical modeling of vowel perception by users of analog multichannel cochlear implants: temporal and channel-amplitude cues. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[10]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Adaptive Signal Processing , 1985 .

[11]  Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses , 2001 .

[12]  P. Loizou Introduction to cochlear implants. , 1999, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[13]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.