Comparing personal trajectories and drawing causal inferences from longitudinal data.

This review considers statistical analysis of data from studies that obtain repeated measures on each of many participants. Such studies aim to describe the average change in populations and to illuminate individual differences in trajectories of change. A person-specific model for the trajectory of each participant is viewed as the foundation of any analysis having these aims. A second, between-person model describes how persons very in their trajectories. This two-stage modeling framework is common to a variety of popular analytic approaches variously labeled hierarchical models, multilevel models, latent growth models, and random coefficient models. Selected published examples reveal how the approach can be flexibly adapted to represent development in domains as diverse as vocabulary growth in early childhood, academic learning, and antisocial propensity during adolescence. The review then considers the problem of drawing causal inferences from repeated measures data.

[1]  John M. Gottman,et al.  The Analysis of Change , 1995 .

[2]  William Meredith,et al.  Latent curve analysis , 1990 .

[3]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[4]  Yeow Meng Thum,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models for Multivariate Outcomes , 1997 .

[5]  Jay Magidson,et al.  Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models , 1979 .

[6]  P. Holland.  Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[7]  D. Rubin.  Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[8]  N. Laird.  Empirical Bayes methods for two-way contingency tables , 1978 .

[9]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[10]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. , 1989 .

[11]  H. Goldstein.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[12]  O. D. Duncan.  Path Analysis: Sociological Examples , 1966, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  R. Hauser,et al.  Education, occupation, and earnings : achievement in the early career , 1976 .

[14]  T. Moffitt.  Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. , 1993, Psychological review.

[15]  N M Thompson,et al.  Analysis of change: modeling individual growth. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  The American Occupational Structure , 1967 .

[17]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  General Longitudinal Modeling of Individual Differences in Experimental Designs: A Latent Variable Framework for Analysis and Power Estimation , 1997 .

[18]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Assessing Direct and Indirect Effects in Multilevel Designs with Latent Variables , 1999 .

[19]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Coming to terms with the terms of risk. , 1997, Archives of general psychiatry.

[20]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[21]  J. Singer,et al.  QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY Modeling the Days of Our Lives: Using Survival Analysis When Designing and Analyzing Longitudinal Studies of Duration and the Timing of Events , 1991 .

[22]  Joseph L Schafer,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 1997 .

[23]  D. Wayne Osgood,et al.  CRIMINAL CAREERS IN THE SHORT-TERM: INTRA-INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN CRIME AND ITS RELATION TO LOCAL LIFE CIRCUMSTANCES* , 1995 .

[24]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[25]  A. Bryk,et al.  Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. , 1991 .

[26]  L. Collins,et al.  Latent Class Models for Stage-Sequential Dynamic Latent Variables , 1992 .

[27]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Toward a coherent framework for comparing trajectories of individual change. , 2001 .

[28]  R. Little,et al.  Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Data from Prevention Trials: Treatment of No-Shows Using Rubin's Causal Model , 1998 .

[29]  D. Cox,et al.  Analysis of Survival Data. , 1985 .

[30]  David Rogosa,et al.  A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. , 1982 .

[31]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimation of the Causal Effect of a Time-Varying Exposure on the Marginal Mean of a Repeated Binary Outcome , 1999 .

[32]  Donald Hedeker,et al.  Application of random-efiects pattern-mixture models for miss-ing data in longitudinal studies , 1997 .

[33]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class–latent growth modeling. , 2001 .

[34]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[35]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Application of a hierarchical linear model to the study of adolescent deviance in an overlapping cohort design. , 1993 .

[36]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach , 1999 .

[37]  M. Seltzer,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Fixed Effects in the Hierarchical Model: A Gibbs Sampling Approach , 1993 .

[38]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  A general theory of crime. , 1992 .

[39]  K. Frank,et al.  The Metric Matters: The Sensitivity of Conclusions About Growth in Student Achievement to Choice of Metric , 1994 .

[40]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Use of the nonequivalent control group design when subjects are growing. , 1977 .

[41]  L. Carter.  The Sustaining Effects Study of Compensatory and Elementary Education , 1984 .

[42]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures Studies , 1995 .