An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models.

An experimental-numerical study was performed to investigate the relationships between computed tomography (CT)-density and ash density, and between ash density and apparent density for bone tissue, to evaluate their influence on the accuracy of subject-specific FE models of human bones. Sixty cylindrical bone specimens were examined. CT-densities were computed from CT images while apparent and ash densities were measured experimentally. The CT/ash-density and ash/apparent-density relationships were calculated. Finite element models of eight human femurs were generated considering these relationships to assess their effect on strain prediction accuracy. CT and ash density were linearly correlated (R(2)=0.997) over the whole density range but not equivalent (intercep t <0, slope >1). A constant ash/apparent-density ratio (0.598+/-0.004) was found for cortical bone. A lower ratio, with a larger dispersion, was found for trabecular bone (0.459+/-0.100), but it became less dispersed, and equal to that of cortical tissue, when testing smaller trabecular specimens (0.598+/-0.036). This suggests that an experimental error occurred in apparent-density measurements for large trabecular specimens and a constant ratio can be assumed valid for the whole density range. Introducing the obtained relationships in the FE modelling procedure improved strain prediction accuracy (R(2)=0.95, RMSE=7%). The results suggest that: (i) a correction of the densitometric calibration should be used when evaluating bone ash-density from clinical CT scans, to avoid ash-density underestimation and overestimation for low- and high-density bone tissue, respectively; (ii) the ash/apparent-density ratio can be assumed constant in human femurs and (iii) the correction improves significantly the model accuracy and should be considered in subject-specific bone modelling.

[1]  J H Keyak,et al.  Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[2]  Rolf Ewers,et al.  A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process. , 2002, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[3]  Zdenek Horak,et al.  Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Fabio Baruffaldi,et al.  Mechanical testing of cancellous bone from the femoral head: experimental errors due to off-axis measurements. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. , 2003, Bone.

[6]  J. Tehranzadeh,et al.  Mechanical properties, density and quantitative CT scan data of trabecular bone with and without metastases. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Jamshid Tehranzadeh,et al.  Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  R I Price,et al.  Formalin fixation effects on vertebral bone density and failure mechanics: an in-vitro study of human and sheep vertebrae. , 1994, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  J. Tehranzadeh,et al.  Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  D R Sumner,et al.  Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  K. Radermacher,et al.  Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  A. Amis,et al.  The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  T. Keller Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  D S Barker,et al.  Validation of a finite element model of the human metacarpal. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  Mark Taylor,et al.  Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  N L Biggs,et al.  Density of fresh and embalmed human compact and cancellous bone. , 1968, American journal of physical anthropology.

[22]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Multimod Data Manager: A tool for data fusion , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[24]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  F van Keulen,et al.  Development and experimental validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the human scapula , 2004, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[26]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. , 1988, Journal of Biomechanics.

[27]  Mark Taylor,et al.  Finite element analysis of the initial stability of ankle arthrodesis with internal fixation: flat cut versus intact joint contours. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[28]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[29]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  D. Burr,et al.  Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  W A Kalender,et al.  A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications. , 1992, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[33]  G. Beaupré,et al.  The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus. , 2001, Bone.

[34]  E. Schneider,et al.  Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[35]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[36]  H. Skinner,et al.  Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[37]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: An in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  A. S. Wong,et al.  Effect of Bone Material Properties on the Initial Stability of a Cementless Hip Stem: A Finite Element Study , 2005, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.