Total Arch Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Double Fenestrated Physician-Modified Stent-Grafts: 100 Patients.

OBJECTIVE The aim was to evaluate early and medium-term outcomes of double fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts for total endovascular aortic arch repair. METHODS This single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected data included 100 patients, from January 2017 to December 2021, undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for zone 0. The fenestrations were a proximal larger fenestration that incorporated the brach2iocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery and a distal smaller fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA). Only the LSA fenestration was stented. RESULTS The median duration for stent-graft modification was 23±6 minutes. Of the 100 patients, 70 were men. The mean patient age was 70±10.5 years. Indications for treatment included degenerative aortic arch aneurysm (n=32), dissecting aortic arch aneurysm after type A dissections (n=23) and (n=19) after type B dissections, acute complicated type B dissection (n=16), and other pathologies (n=10). Technical success rate was 97%. The 30 day mortality was 2% (n=2). Four patients (4%) had minor stroke with full recovery. One patient (1%) had a type IA endoleak, 1 patient (1%) had a type IB endoleak, and 2 patients (2%) have a type II endoleak from the LSA. Eight patients (8%) required reintervention: 1 type IA endoleak, 1 type IB endoleak, 1 retrograde type A dissection, and 5 because of access-related complications. During a mean follow-up of 24±7.2 months, there were no aortic rupture, paraplegia, and all supra-aortic trunks were patent. CONCLUSIONS Double homemade fenestrated TEVAR is both feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair avoiding the need for anatomical and extra-anatomical surgical revascularization. The long-term durability will need to be assessed in studies with long-term follow-up. CLINICAL IMPACT Double homemade fenestrated TEVAR is effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair avoiding the need for anatomical and extra-anatomical surgical revascularization. The standout feature of this double fenestrated device is its simple handling during operation with the proximal fenestrations being directed to the orifices of the BT and LCCA automatically when the LSA fenestration is catheterized and secured by covered stent placement. The deployment algorithm actively steers the operator away from superfluous manipulations of the device within the arch and avoids guidewire manipulation in carotid arteries. The long-term durability will need to be assessed in studies with long-term follow-up.

[1]  P. Alric,et al.  Endovascular aortic arch repair with a pre-cannulated double-fenestrated physician-modified stent graft: a benchtop experiment. , 2021, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[2]  H. Rousseau,et al.  Results of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Relay Branch system. , 2021, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  P. Alric,et al.  Double fenestrated physician-modified stent-grafts for total aortic arch repair in 50 patients. , 2020, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  P. Alric,et al.  Aortic Arch Anatomy Pattern in Patients Treated Using Double Homemade Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair , 2020, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[5]  P. Alric,et al.  Midterm Follow-up of Fenestrated and Scalloped Physician-Modified Endovascular Grafts for Zone 2 TEVAR , 2020, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[6]  T. Ohki,et al.  A Novel Shaggy Aorta Scoring System to Predict Embolic Complications Following Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. , 2019, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[7]  M. Ferri,et al.  iTalian RegIstry of doUble inner branch stent graft for arch PatHology (the TRIUmPH Registry). , 2019, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  C. Detter,et al.  Single‐center experience with an inner branched arch endograft , 2019, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  J. Mathew,et al.  Hypothermia and cerebral protection strategies in aortic arch surgery: a comparative effectiveness analysis from the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database , 2017, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  S. Haulon,et al.  Total Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Arch Disease Using an Arch Endograft With 3 Inner Branches , 2017, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[11]  Kiyofumi Morishita,et al.  Physician-Modified Thoracic Stent-Grafts for the Treatment of Aortic Arch Lesions , 2017, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[12]  V. Thomson,et al.  Externalized Guidewires to Facilitate Fenestrated Endograft Deployment in the Aortic Arch , 2016, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[13]  P. Desgranges,et al.  Global experience with an inner branched arch endograft. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  K. Hamano,et al.  Aortic arch surgery in octogenarians: is it justified? , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[15]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Contemporary results for proximal aortic replacement in North America. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.