Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance.

The confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) has enormous potential in many biological fields. When tests are made to evaluate the performance of a CLSM, the usual subjective assessment is accomplished by using a histological test slide to create a "pretty picture." Without the use of functional tests, many of the machines could be working at suboptimal performance levels, delivering suboptimum performance and possibly misleading data. To replace the subjectivity in evaluating a confocal microscope, tests were derived or perfected that measure field illumination, lens clarity, laser power, laser stability, dichroic functionality, spectral registration, axial resolution, scanning stability, photomultiplier tube quality, overall machine stability, and system noise. These tests will help serve as a guide for other investigators to ensure that their machines are working correctly to provide data that are accurate with the necessary resolution, sensitivity, and precision. Utilization of this proposed testing approach will help eliminate the subjective nature of assessing the CLSM and allow different machines to be compared. These tests are essential if one is to make intensity measurements.

[1]  Per-Ola Forsgren,et al.  Chapter 3 Confocal Microscopy: Important Considerations for Accurate Imaging , 1993 .

[2]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[3]  Robert A Hoffman,et al.  Standardization, Calibration, and Control in Flow Cytometry , 1997, Current protocols in cytometry.

[4]  J. Pawley,et al.  The 39 steps: a cautionary tale of quantitative 3-D fluorescence microscopy. , 2000, BioTechniques.

[5]  J. J. Art,et al.  Photon Detectors for Confocal Microscopy , 2006 .

[6]  J. Watson,et al.  Flow Cytometry Data Analysis: Basic Concepts and Statistics , 1992 .

[7]  R M Zucker,et al.  Practical confocal microscopy and the evaluation of system performance. , 1999, Methods.

[8]  R. Zucker,et al.  Statistical evaluation of confocal microscopy images. , 2001, Cytometry.

[9]  D. Piston,et al.  Choosing objective lenses: the importance of numerical aperture and magnification in digital optical microscopy. , 1998, The Biological bulletin.

[10]  André Marion,et al.  Introduction to Image Processing , 1990, Springer US.

[11]  Mark D. Fricker,et al.  Aberration control in quantitative imaging of botanical specimens by multidimensional fluorescence microscopy , 1996 .

[12]  James B. Pawley,et al.  Tutorial on Practical Confocal Microscopy and Use of the Confocal Test Specimen , 2006 .

[13]  James B. Pawley,et al.  Fundamental Limits in Confocal Microscopy , 2006 .

[14]  A Liljeborg,et al.  Confocal 3-dimensional DNA image cytometry in thick tissue sections. , 1996, Cytometry.

[15]  P Steyger Assessing confocal microscopy systems for purchase. , 1999, Methods.

[16]  G Cox,et al.  Measurement in the confocal microscope. , 1999, Methods in molecular biology.

[17]  Jason R Swedlow,et al.  Measuring tubulin content in Toxoplasma gondii: A comparison of laser-scanning confocal and wide-field fluorescence microscopy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz,et al.  Practical flow cytometry (3rd edn): by Howard M. Shapiro, Wiley-Liss 1995. £49.95 (542 pages) ISBN 0 471 303763 , 1995 .

[19]  J Bryan,et al.  Validation of an imaging system: steps to evaluate and validate a microscope imaging system for quantitative studies. , 1989, Methods in cell biology.

[20]  D Carter Practical considerations for collecting confocal images. , 1999, Methods in molecular biology.

[21]  Carol J. Cogswell,et al.  The Specimen Illumination Path and Its Effect on Image Quality , 1995 .

[22]  A Liljeborg,et al.  A method to compensate for light attenuation with depth in three‐dimensional DNA image cytometry using a confocal scanning laser microscope , 1995, Journal of microscopy.

[23]  James B. Pawley,et al.  CHAPTER 3 – Sources of Noise in Three-Dimensional Microscopical Data Sets , 1994 .

[24]  Judy E. Trogadis,et al.  Three-dimensional confocal microscopy : volume investigation of biological specimens , 1994 .

[25]  S. Paddock,et al.  Confocal laser scanning microscopy. , 1999, BioTechniques.

[26]  E L Gershey,et al.  Increasing sensitivity of the Ortho analytical cytofluorograph by modifying the fluid system. , 1990, Cytometry.

[27]  P. M. Delaney,et al.  Fiberoptics in Confocal Microscopy , 1995 .

[28]  D. E. Wolf,et al.  Quantitative video microscopy. , 1998, Methods in cell biology.

[29]  Howard M. Shapiro,et al.  Practical Flow Cytometry , 1985 .

[30]  James V. Watson,et al.  Introduction to Flow Cytometry , 1991 .

[31]  Ian T. Young,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of light microscopes based on image processing techniques , 1998 .