Ambidexterity and Survival in Corporate Venture Units

Corporate venture (CV) units constitute vehicles through which firms may act ambidextrously, thereby increasing their longevity, but they suffer from a high failure rate. The authors examine why and how some CV units last significantly longer than others. They argue that CV units endure by developing an ambidextrous orientation themselves—they build new capabilities for the parent firm while simultaneously leveraging its existing strengths. They argue that CV units become ambidextrous by nurturing a supportive relational context, defined by the strength of their relationships with three different sets of actors—parent firm executives, business unit managers, and members of the venture capital community. Using primary data collected from 95 CV units over a three-year period, the authors test and find support for these arguments.

[1]  Donald J. Schepker,et al.  The Many Futures of Contracts , 2014 .

[2]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross‐level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes , 2012 .

[3]  Gary Dushnitsky Corporate Venture Capital in the Twenty-First Century: an Integral Part of Firms' Innovation Toolkit , 2012 .

[4]  Dorothy A. Leonard,et al.  Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development , 2011 .

[5]  Rémi Jardat,et al.  Psychological Contracts in Organizations Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements , 2011 .

[6]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  CROSSROADS - Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Organizational designs and innovation streams , 2010 .

[8]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[9]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Unique Resources of Corporate Venture Capitalists as a Key to Entry into Rigid Venture Capital Syndication Networks , 2010 .

[10]  S. Kotha,et al.  The role of exploratory subunits in organizational ambidexterity: An inductive examination of corporate venture capital units , 2010 .

[11]  Qing Cao,et al.  Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2009 .

[14]  Christopher Williams,et al.  Exploring the Internal and External Venturing of Large R&D-Intensive Firms , 2009 .

[15]  Mark S. Granovetter,et al.  The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley's complex innovation network , 2009 .

[16]  Wolfgang H. Güttel,et al.  Continuously Hanging by a Thread: Managing Contextually Ambidextrous Organizations , 2009 .

[17]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Renewal Through Reorganization: The Value of Inconsistencies between Formal and Informal Organization , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[18]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Transferability of the Venture Capital Model to the Corporate Context: Implications for the Performance of Corporate Venture Units , 2009 .

[19]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules , 2009 .

[20]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Strategy-organization configurations in corporate venture units: Impact on performance and survival , 2008 .

[22]  Gary Dushnitsky Corporate Venture Capital: Past Evidence and Future Directions , 2008 .

[23]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[24]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance , 2008 .

[25]  Jean-Etienne de Bettignies,et al.  Corporate Venturing, Allocation of Talent, and Competition for Star Managers , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Irem Demirkan,et al.  The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations: Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Markku V. J. Maula Corporate Venture Capital as a Strategic Tool for Corporations , 2007 .

[28]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management , 2007 .

[29]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Exploratory and Exploitative Learning in New Product Development: A Social Capital Perspective on New Technology Ventures in China , 2007 .

[30]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[31]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[32]  Jun Du,et al.  The innovation value chain , 2006 .

[33]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value , 2006 .

[34]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[35]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[36]  S. Kotha,et al.  Knowledge Creation Through External Venturing: Evidence from the Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturing Industry , 2006 .

[37]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[38]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[39]  Bernadette A. Minton,et al.  How Has CEO Turnover Changed? Increasingly Performance Sensitive Boards and Increasingly Uneasy CEOS , 2006 .

[40]  Tapabrata Maiti,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.) , 2006 .

[41]  V. Gaba Learning While Innovating: The Abandonment of Corporate Venture Capital Programs , 2006 .

[42]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Organizing for Innovation: Managing the Coordination-Autonomy Dilemma in Technology Acquisitions , 2006 .

[43]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Ambidexterity: The Impact of Environmental and Organizational Antecedents , 2005 .

[44]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN ORGANIZATIONS: MULTIPLE NETWORKS, MULTIPLE PHASES , 2005 .

[45]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Preferences, Identity, and Competition: Predicting Tie Strength from Demographic Data , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[47]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures , 2005 .

[48]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[49]  Erkko Autio,et al.  Corporate Venture Capitalists and Independent Venture Capitalists: What do they know, Who do They Know and Should Entrepreneurs Care? , 2005 .

[50]  Liisa Välikangas,et al.  Managing internal corporate venturing cycles , 2005 .

[51]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[52]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations , 2004 .

[53]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[54]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[55]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[56]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[57]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[58]  D. Sull,et al.  Managing by commitments. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[59]  Anne Nelson,et al.  External Corporate Venturing: Strategic Renewal in Rapidly Changing Industries , 2003 .

[60]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[61]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  The Future of Corporate Venturing , 2003 .

[62]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[63]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[64]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements , 2002 .

[65]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Making sense of corporate venture capital. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[66]  M. Lounsbury Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy and the Acquisition of Resources , 2001 .

[67]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[68]  M. Sobel,et al.  Sociological Methodology - 2001 , 2001 .

[69]  R. Amit,et al.  A dynamic perspective of internal fit in corporate venturing , 2001 .

[70]  Catherine Balagtas,et al.  Getting that job. , 2012, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[71]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[72]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Designing Corporate Ventures in the Shadow of Private Venture Capital , 2000 .

[73]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Corporate venture capital and the creation of U.S.Public Companies: The impact of sources of venture capital on the performance of portfolio companies , 2000 .

[74]  Charles Baden-Fuller,et al.  Lessons from the Celltech Case: Balancing Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Renewal , 1999 .

[75]  Roderick E. White,et al.  The Evolution of Social Structure: Why Biology Matters , 1999 .

[76]  J. Tidd,et al.  Learn or Leverage? Strategic Diversification and Organizational Learning Through Corporate Ventures , 1999 .

[77]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship , 1999 .

[78]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[79]  Adler,et al.  Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system , 1999 .

[80]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  The Determinants of Corporate Venture Capital Successes: Organizational Structure, Incentives, and Complementarities , 1998 .

[81]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[82]  Will Mitchell,et al.  The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market , 1998 .

[83]  A. Lewin,et al.  The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[84]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[85]  K. McNally Corporate Venture Capital: Bridging the Equity Gap in the Small Business Sector , 1997 .

[86]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[87]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[88]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[89]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[90]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[91]  D. Dougherty Managing Your Core Incompetencies for Corporate Venturing , 1995 .

[92]  Rhonda K. Reger,et al.  REFRAMING THE ORGANIZATION: WHY IMPLEMENTING TOTAL QUALITY IS EASIER SAID THAN DONE , 1994 .

[93]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[94]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[95]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[96]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[97]  J. Brockner The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress , 1992 .

[98]  Alfred D. Chandler The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm , 1991 .

[99]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Managing Culture as a Competitive Resource: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[100]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[101]  L. Leemis Applied Linear Regression Models , 1991 .

[102]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[103]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Permanently Failing Organizations. , 1991 .

[104]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Corporate venture capitalists: Autonomy, obstacles, and performance , 1988 .

[105]  Hollister B. Sykes The anatomy of a corporate venturing program: Factors influencing success , 1986 .

[106]  M. Sobel Some New Results on Indirect Effects and Their Standard Errors in Covariance Structure Models , 1986 .

[107]  R. Kanter Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies , 1985 .

[108]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[109]  Robert A. Burgelman Designs for Corporate Entrepreneurship in Established Firms , 1984 .

[110]  Robert A. Burgelman A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy , 1983 .

[111]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[112]  M. Sobel Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[113]  B. M. Staw The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .

[114]  Norman D. Fast Pitfalls of Corporate Venturing , 1981 .

[115]  Norman D. Fast The future of industrial new venture departments , 1979 .

[116]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[117]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[118]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[119]  J. L. Bower Managing the resource allocation process: A study of corporate planning and investment , 1970 .

[120]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[121]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[122]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .