Twist propagation in dinucleosome arrays.

We present a Monte Carlo simulation study of the distribution and propagation of twist from one DNA linker to another for a two-nucleosome array subjected to externally applied twist. A mesoscopic model of the array that incorporates nucleosome geometry along with the bending and twisting mechanics of the linkers is employed and external twist is applied in stepwise increments to mimic quasistatic twisting of chromatin fibers. Simulation results reveal that the magnitude and sign of the imposed and induced twist on contiguous linkers depend strongly on their relative orientation. Remarkably, the relative direction of the induced and applied twist can become inverted for a subset of linker orientations-a phenomenon we refer to as "twist inversion". We characterize the twist inversion, as a function of relative linker orientation, in a phase diagram and explain its key features using a simple model based on the geometry of the nucleosome/linker complex. In addition to twist inversion, our simulations reveal "nucleosome flipping", whereby nucleosomes may undergo sudden flipping in response to applied twist, causing a rapid bending of the linker and a significant change in the overall twist and writhe of the array. Our findings shed light on the underlying mechanisms by which torsional stresses impact chromatin organization.

[1]  M. Peletier,et al.  On end rotation for open rods undergoing large deformations , 2007 .

[2]  J. Widom,et al.  Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Anharmonic Torsional Stiffness of DNA Revealed under Small External Torques , 2010 .

[4]  K. Klenin,et al.  Computation of writhe in modeling of supercoiled DNA. , 2000, Biopolymers.

[5]  D. Levens,et al.  The functional response of upstream DNA to dynamic supercoiling in vivo , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[6]  A. Bensimon,et al.  The Elasticity of a Single Supercoiled DNA Molecule , 1996, Science.

[7]  T Schlick,et al.  Computational modeling predicts the structure and dynamics of chromatin fiber. , 2001, Structure.

[8]  G. W. Hatfield,et al.  DNA topology-mediated control of global gene expression in Escherichia coli. , 2002, Annual review of genetics.

[9]  G. Koudelka.  Recognition of DNA structure by 434 repressor. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  M. Groudine,et al.  Controlling the double helix , 2003, Nature.

[11]  Magnetic Tweezers Measurement of Single Molecule Torque , 2009 .

[12]  David Levens,et al.  The dynamic response of upstream DNA to transcription-generated torsional stress , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[13]  T. Richmond,et al.  Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 a resolution. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Christophe Lavelle,et al.  Chromatin Fiber Dynamics under Tension and Torsion , 2010, International journal of molecular sciences.

[15]  Phoebe A Rice,et al.  Integration host factor: putting a twist on protein-DNA recognition. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  Gaurav Arya,et al.  Biophysics of knotting. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[17]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA , 1994, Nature.

[18]  T. Strick,et al.  Behavior of supercoiled DNA. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[19]  H. Ng,et al.  Mediation of the A/B-DNA helix transition by G-tracts in the crystal structure of duplex CATGGGCCCATG. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  C. Bustamante,et al.  Overstretching B-DNA: The Elastic Response of Individual Double-Stranded and Single-Stranded DNA Molecules , 1996, Science.

[21]  Tamar Schlick,et al.  Flexible histone tails in a new mesoscopic oligonucleosome model. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[22]  J. Thompson,et al.  Instability and self-contact phenomena in the writhing of clamped rods , 2003 .

[23]  K Rippe,et al.  Looping dynamics of linear DNA molecules and the effect of DNA curvature: a study by Brownian dynamics simulation. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[24]  T. Strick,et al.  Twisting DNA: single molecule studies , 2004 .

[25]  M. Botchan,et al.  DNA topology, not DNA sequence, is a critical determinant for Drosophila ORC–DNA binding , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[26]  J. Berger,et al.  DNA topoisomerases: harnessing and constraining energy to govern chromosome topology , 2008, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[27]  J. Nitiss.  DNA topoisomerase II and its growing repertoire of biological functions , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[28]  E. L. Starostin.  On the writhe of non-closed curves , 2002 .

[29]  A. C. Maggs,et al.  Writhing geometry of open DNA , 2003, physics/0301028.

[30]  C. Lavelle.  DNA torsional stress propagates through chromatin fiber and participates in transcriptional regulation , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[31]  J. Mozziconacci,et al.  Structural plasticity of single chromatin fibers revealed by torsional manipulation , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[32]  J. Thompson,et al.  Writhing instabilities of twisted rods: from infinite to finite length , 2002 .

[33]  J. Wang,et al.  Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Jeff Wereszczynski,et al.  On structural transitions, thermodynamic equilibrium, and the phase diagram of DNA and RNA duplexes under torque and tension , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  R. Mann,et al.  Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[36]  J. Zlatanova,et al.  Nucleosome assembly depends on the torsion in the DNA molecule: a magnetic tweezers study. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[37]  L. Mouawad,et al.  Nucleosome chiral transition under positive torsional stress in single chromatin fibers. , 2007, Molecular cell.